BACKGROUND Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a controversial indication for liver transplantation (LT) in HIV-infected patients due to reportedly poor outcomes. METHODS This prospective U.S. multicenter cohort study compared patient and graft survival in 89 HCV-HIV coinfected versus 2 different controls groups: 235 HCV monoinfected LT controls and all U.S. transplant recipients ≥65 years. RESULTS The 3-year patient and graft survival rates (95% CI) were 60% (47–71%) and 53% (40–64%) in HCV-HIV versus 79% (72–84%) and 74% (66–79%) in HCV recipients (both p<0.001) and HIV infection was the only factor significantly associated with reduced patient and graft survival. Among HCV-HIV patients, older donor age (HR=1.3 per decade), combined kidney-LT (HR=3.8), HCV-positive donor (HR=2.5), and body mass index (BMI) less than 21 kg/m2 (HR=3.2) were independent predictors of graft loss. In patients without these latter 3 factors, patient and graft survival were similar to those in U.S. LT recipients. The 3-year incidence of treated acute rejection was 1.6-fold higher in HCV-HIV versus HCV (log rank p=0.02) but cumulative incidence of severe HCV disease (29% versus 23% at 3 years, respectively) were not significantly different (p=0.21). CONCLUSIONS Patient and graft survival are lower in HCV-HIV compared to HCV alone LT patients. Importantly, rates of treated acute rejection but not HCV disease severity are significantly higher in HCV-HIV compared to HCV recipients. Our results indicate that HCV per se is not a contraindication to LT in HIV patients but recipient and donor selection as well as management of acute rejection strongly influence outcomes.

Background— Remodeling occurs in both ventricle and atrium in dilated cardiomyopathy and heart failure. However, the alteration of atrial extracellular matrix components during remodeling and its effect on the electrical remodeling and atrial arrhythmia have never been explored. Methods and Results— Atrial tissue samples of 53 explanted hearts from patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and end-stage heart failure who underwent heart transplantation were examined. Nineteen patients had permanent atrial fibrillation (PmAF), 18 had persistent AF (PsAF), and 16 had no documented AF (NAF). Sixteen donor left atria (LA) were used as controls (CNs). Western Blot analysis revealed a selective downregulation of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-2 in PmAF and PsAF groups compared with the NAF and CN groups and an upregulation of atrial metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 that was most pronounced in the PmAF group followed by the PsAF and NAF groups. Immunofluorescent staining revealed that in the LA, type I collagen volume fraction (CVF-I) increased significantly in the PmAF group followed by the PsAF and NAF groups compared with that in CN. LA CVF-I significantly correlated with LA dimension and TIMP-2 to MMP-2 ratio. In the PsAF group, CVF-I/CVF-III ratio was significantly correlated with AF duration and the frequency of AF recurrence. Conclusions— Atrial extracellular matrix remodeling manifested by the selective downregulation of TIMP-2 along with upregulation of MMP-2 and CVF-I in the atrium is associated with the development of sustained atrial fibrillation in patients with cardiomyopathy and heart failure.

Noninvasive biomarkers are needed to monitor stable patients after kidney transplant (KT), because subclinical acute rejection (subAR), currently detectable only with surveillance biopsies, can lead to chronic rejection and graft loss. We conducted a multicenter study to develop a blood-based molecular biomarker for subAR using peripheral blood paired with surveillance biopsies and strict clinical phenotyping algorithms for discovery and validation. At a predefined threshold, 72% to 75% of KT recipients achieved a negative biomarker test correlating with the absence of subAR (negative predictive value: 78%-88%), while a positive test was obtained in 25% to 28% correlating with the presence of subAR (positive predictive value: 47%-61%). The clinical phenotype and biomarker independently and statistically correlated with a composite clinical endpoint (renal function, biopsy-proved acute rejection, ≥grade 2 interstitial fibrosis, and tubular atrophy), as well as with de novo donor-specific antibodies. We also found that <50% showed histologic improvement of subAR on follow-up biopsies despite treatment and that the biomarker could predict this outcome. Our data suggest that a blood-based biomarker that reduces the need for the indiscriminate use of invasive surveillance biopsies and that correlates with transplant outcomes could be used to monitor KT recipients with stable renal function, including after treatment for subAR, potentially improving KT outcomes.

No abstract