Background:Gait impairments are common and disabling in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Applying compensation strategies helps to overcome these gait deficits. Clinical observations suggest that the efficacy of different compensation strategies varies depending on both individual patient characteristics and the context in which the strategies are applied. This has never been investigated systematically, hampering the ability of clinicians to provide a more personalized approach to gait rehabilitation.Objective:We had three aims: (1) to evaluate patients’ awareness and actual use of compensation categories for gait impairments in PD; (2) to investigate the patient-rated efficacy of the various compensation strategies, and whether this efficacy depends on the context in which the strategies are applied; and (3) to explore differences in the efficacy between subgroups based on sex, age, disease duration, freezing status, and ability to perform a dual task.Methods:A survey was conducted among 4,324 adults with PD and self-reported disabling gait impairments.Results:The main findings are: (1) compensation strategies for gait impairments are commonly used by persons with PD, but their awareness of the full spectrum of available strategies is limited; (2) the patient-rated efficacy of compensation strategies is high, but varies depending on the context in which they are applied; and (3) compensation strategies are useful for all types of PD patients, but the efficacy of the different strategies varies per person.Conclusions:The choice of compensation strategies for gait impairment in PD should be tailored to the individual patient, as well as to the context in which the strategy needs to be applied.Classification of Evidence:This data provides Class IV evidence that compensation strategies are an effective treatment for gait impairment in Parkinson's disease patients with gait impairment.

Background Cueing strategies can alleviate freezing of gait (FOG) in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD). We evaluated tactile cueing delivered via vibrating socks, which has the benefit of not being noticeable to bystanders. Objective To evaluate the effect of tactile cueing compared to auditory cueing on FOG. Methods Thirty-one persons with PD with FOG performed gait tasks during both ON and OFF state. The effect of open loop and closed loop tactile cueing, as delivered by vibrating socks, was compared to an active control group (auditory cueing) and to a baseline condition (uncued gait). These four conditions were balanced between subjects. Gait tasks were videotaped and annotated for FOG by two experienced raters. Motion data were collected to analyze spatiotemporal gait parameters. Responders were defined as manifesting a relative reduction of > 10% in the percent time frozen compared to uncued gait. Results The average percent time frozen during uncued gait was 11.2% in ON and 21.5% in OFF state. None of the three tested cueing modalities affected the percentage of time frozen in either the ON (p = 0.20) or OFF state (p = 0.12). The number of FOG episodes and spatiotemporal gait parameters were also not affected. We found that 22 out of 31 subjects responded to cueing, the response to the three types of cueing was highly individual. Conclusions Cueing did not improve FOG at the group level; however, tactile as well as auditory cueing improved FOG in many individuals. This highlights the need for a personalized approach when using cueing to treat FOG.

Background and Objectives:Compensation strategies are essential in Parkinson’s disease (PD) gait rehabilitation. However, besides external cueing, these strategies have rarely been investigated systematically. We aimed to: (1) establish the patients’ perspective on the efficacy and usability of five different compensation strategies; (2) quantify the efficacy of these strategies on spatiotemporal gait parameters; and (3) explore associations between the effects of specific strategies and patient characteristics.Methods:We recruited persons with PD and self-reported disabling gait impairments for this lab-based, within-subject study. Clinimetrics included: questionnaires (NFOG-Q, VMIQ-2, GMSI), cognitive assessments (ANT, MoCA, Brixton), and physical examinations (MDS-UPDRS III, Mini-BEST, tandem gait, rapid turns test). Gait assessment consisted of six 3-minute trials of continuous walking around a 6-meter walkway. Trials comprised: 1) baseline gait; 2) external cueing; 3) internal cueing; 4) action observation; 5) motor imagery; and 6) adopting a new walking pattern. Spatiotemporal gait parameters were acquired using 3D motion capture analysis. Strategy efficacy was determined by the change in gait variability compared to baseline gait. Associated patient characteristics were explored using regression analyses.Results:101 participants (50 men; median[range] age: 66[47-91] years) were included. The effects of the different strategies varied greatly among participants. While participants with higher baseline variability showed larger improvements using compensation strategies, participants without freezing of gait, with lower MDS-UPDRS III scores, higher balance capacity and better performance in orienting attention, also showed greater improvements in gait variability. Higher MoCA scores were associated with greater efficacy of external cueing.Discussion:Our findings support the use of compensation strategies in gait rehabilitation for PD, but highlight the importance of a personalized approach. Even patients with high gait variability are able to improve through the application of compensation strategies, but certain levels of cognitive and functional reserve seem necessary to optimally benefit from them.Classification of Evidence:This study provides Class III evidence that gait compensation strategies can be effective in persons with PD.