Abstract. The European APD Outcome Study (EAPOS) is a 2-yr, prospective, multicenter study of the feasibility and clinical outcomes of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) in anuric patients. A total of 177 patients were enrolled with a median age of 54 yr (range, 21 to 91 yr). Previous median total time on dialysis was 38 mo (range, 1.6 to 259 mo), and 36% of patients had previously been on hemodialysis for Ͼ90 d. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease were present in 17% and 46% of patients, respectively. The APD prescription was adjusted at physician discretion to aim for creatinine clearance (Ccrea) Ն60 L/wk per 1.73 m 2 and ultrafiltration (UF) Ն750 ml/24 h during the first 6 mo. Baseline solute transport status (D/P) was determined by peritoneal equilibration test. At 1 yr, 78% and 74% achieved Ccrea and UF targets, respectively; median drained dialysate volume was 16.2 L/24 h with 50% of patients using icodextrin. Baseline D/P was not related to UF achieved at 1 yr. At 2 yr, patient survival was 78% and technique survival was 62%. Baseline predictors of poor survival were age (Ͼ65 yr; P ϭ 0.006), nutritional status (Subjective Global Assessment grade C; P ϭ 0.009), diabetic status (P ϭ 0.008), and UF (Ͻ750 ml/24 h; P ϭ 0.047). Time-averaged analyses showed that age, Subjective Global Assessment grade C and diabetic status predicted patient survival with UF the next most significant variable (risk ratio, 0.5/L per d; P ϭ 0.097). Baseline Ccrea, time-averaged Ccrea, and baseline D/P had no effect on patient or technique survival. This study shows that anuric patients can successfully use APD. Baseline UF, not Ccrea or membrane permeability, is associated with patient survival.

Abstract. Worsening fluid balance results in reduced technique and patient survival in peritoneal dialysis. Under these conditions, the glucose polymer icodextrin is known to enhance ultrafiltration in the long dwell. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial was undertaken to compare icodextrin versus 2.27% glucose to establish whether icodextrin improves fluid status. Fifty patients with urine output Ͻ750 ml/d, high solute transport, and either treated hypertension or untreated BP Ͼ140/90 mmHg, or a requirement for the equivalent of all 2.27% glucose exchanges, were randomized 1:1 and evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 mo. Members of the icodextrin group lost weight, whereas the control group gained weight. Similar differences in total body water were observed, largely explained by reduced extracellular fluid volume in those receiving icodextrin, who also achieved better ultrafiltration and total sodium losses at 3 mo (P Ͻ 0.05) and had better maintenance of urine volume at 6 mo (P ϭ 0.039). In patients fulfilling the study's inclusion criteria, the use of icodextrin, when compared with 2.27% glucose, in the long exchange improves fluid removal and status in peritoneal dialysis. This effect is apparent within 1 mo of commencement and was sustained for 6 mo without harmful effects on residual renal function.

Our results demonstrate that most of HD patients have grossly elevated tHcy levels, but that the absolute level appears to be dependent on nutritional status, protein intake, and SAlb. The results also suggest that the lower tHcy levels in patients with CVD than in those without CVD may be related to the higher prevalence of malnutrition and hypoalbuminemia in the CVD patients. This is also in accordance with our observation that the patients with lower tHcy had a worse survival rate than those with higher tHcy, considering that malnutrition is a strong risk factor for mortality and that CVD is the most common cause of death in ESRD patients.

No abstract