Background: In this work, we assessed the efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin (BV) plus ESHAP (BRESHAP) as secondline therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (RRHL) to improve the results before autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT).Patients and methods: This was a multicenter, open-label, phase I-II trial of patients with RRHL after first-line chemotherapy. Treatment had three 21-day cycles of etoposide, solumedrol, high-dose AraC, and cisplatin. BV was administered at three dose levels (0.9, 1.2, and 1.8 mg/kg) intravenous on day -1 to 3 þ 3 cohorts of patients. Final BV dose was 1.8 mg/kg. Responding patients proceeded to ASCT, followed by three BV courses (1.8 mg/kg, every 21 days). Main end points for evaluation were maximum tolerable dose and overall and complete response (CR) before ASCT.Results: A total of 66 patients were recruited (median age 36 years; range 18-66): 40 were primary refractory, 16 early relapse and 10 late relapse. There were 39 severe adverse events were reported in 22 patients, most frequently fever (n ¼ 25, 35% neutropenic), including 3 deaths. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity presented in 28 cases: neutropenia (n ¼ 21), thrombocytopenia (n ¼ 14), and anemia (n ¼ 7). Grade !3-4 extrahematological adverse events (!5%) were non-neutropenic fever (n ¼ 13) and hypomagnesaemia (n ¼ 3). Sixty-four patients underwent stem-cell mobilization; all collected >2Â10e6/kg CD34þ cells (median 5.75; range 2.12-33.4). Overall response before transplant was 91% (CI 84% to 98%), including 70% (CRs 95% CI 59% to 81%). 60 patients were transplanted with no failure engraftments. Post-transplant response was CR in 49 patients (82% CI 73% to 91%) and partial responses in six (10% CI 5% to 15%). After a mean follow-up of 27 months, the 30-month time to treatment to failure was 74% (95% CI 68% to 80%), progression-free survival 71% (95% CI 65% to 77%), and overall survival 91% (CI 84% to 98%).
Conclusion:BRESHAP looks a safe and effective pre-transplant induction regimen, does not jeopardize transplant and allows long-term remissions and survival.
Objectives
The aim of the study was to assess the progression of liver fibrosis in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐coinfected patients with no or mild‐to‐moderate fibrosis (stages F0−F2).
Methods
Liver fibrosis was reassessed by transient elastometry (TE) between January 2009 and November 2011 in HIV/HCV‐coinfected patients with stage F0−F2 fibrosis in a liver biopsy performed between January 1997 and December 2007. Patients with liver stiffness at the end of follow‐up < 7.1 kPa were defined as nonprogressors, and those with values ≥ 9.5 kPa or who died from liver disease were defined as progressors. Cirrhosis was defined as a cut‐off of 14.6 kPa. The follow‐up period was the time between liver biopsy and TE. Cox regression models adjusted for age, gender and liver fibrosis stage at baseline were applied.
Results
The median follow‐up time was 7.8 years [interquartile range (IQR) 5.5–10 years]. The study population comprised 162 patients [115 (71%) nonprogressors and 47 (29%) progressors; 19 patients (11.7%) had cirrhosis]. The median time from the diagnosis of HCV infection to the end of follow‐up was 20 years (IQR 16.3–23.1 years). Three progressors died from liver disease (1.8%). The variables associated with a lower risk of progression were age ≤ 38 years (hazard ratio (HR) 0.32; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16–0.62; P = 0.001], having received interferon (HR 2.18; 95% CI 1.14–4.15; P = 0.017), being hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) negative (HR 0.20; 95% CI 0.04–0.92; P = 0.039), and baseline F0−F1 (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.28–0.86; P = 0.017).
Conclusions
A high proportion of patients with stage F0−F2 fibrosis progress to advanced liver fibrosis. Advanced liver fibrosis must be included in the list of diseases associated with aging. Our results support the recommendation to offer HCV antiviral therapy to HIV/HCV‐coinfected patients at early stages of liver fibrosis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.