BACKGROUND:The expanded endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is limited laterally by the internal carotid artery (ICA). The EEA to the paramedian skull base often requires complex maneuvers such as dissection of the Eustachian tube (ET) and foramen lacerum (FL), and ICA manipulation. An endoscopic contralateral transmaxillary approach (CTMA) has the potential to provide adequate exposure of the paramedian skull base while bypassing manipulation of the aforementioned anatomic structures. OBJECTIVE: To quantify and compare the surgical nuances of a CTMA and a contralateral EEA when approaching the paramedian skull base in cadaveric specimens. METHODS: Five adult cadaveric heads were dissected bilaterally (10 sides) using a contralateral EEA and a CTMA to expose targets of interest at the paramedian skull base. For each target in both approaches, the surgical freedom, angle of attack, the corridor's "perspective angle," and "turning angle" to circumvent the ICA, ET, and FL were obtained. RESULTS: The CTMA achieved superior surgical freedom at all targets (P < .05) except at the root entry point of cranial nerve XII. The CTMA provided superior vertical and horizontal angles of "attack" to the majority of targets of interest. Except when approaching the root entry point of cranial nerve XII, the CTMA "turning angle" around the ICA, ET, and FL were wider with CTMA for all targets. CONCLUSION: A CTMA complements the EEA to access the paramedian skull base. A CTMA may limit the need for complex maneuvers such as ICA mobilization and dissection of the ET and FL when approaching the paramedian skull base.

BACKGROUND: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a promising noninvasive biomarker to capture tumor genetics in patients with brain tumors. Research into its clinical utility, however, has not been standardized because the sensitivity and specificity of ctDNA remain undefined. OBJECTIVE: To (1) review the primary literature about ctDNA in adults with glioma to compare the sensitivity and specificity of ctDNA in the cerebrospinal fluid vs the plasma and (2) to evaluate the effect of tumor grade on detection of ctDNA. METHODS: PRISMA-guided systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using published studies that assessed ctDNA in either plasma or cerebrospinal fluid among adult patients with confirmed glioma. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves were generated using the Rücker-Schumacher method, and area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. RESULTS: Meta-analysis revealed improved biomarker performance for CSF (AUC = 0.947) vs plasma (AUC = 0.741) ctDNA, although this did not reach statistical significance (P = .141). Qualitative analysis revealed greater sensitivities among single-allele PCR and small, targeted next-generation sequencing panels compared with broader panels. It additionally demonstrated higher sensitivity of ctDNA detection in high-grade vs low-grade gliomas, although these analyses were limited by a lack of specificity reporting in many studies. CONCLUSION: ctDNA seems to be a highly sensitive and specific noninvasive biomarker among adults with gliomas. To maximize its performance, CSF should be studied with targeted genetic analysis platforms, particularly in high-grade gliomas. Further studies on ctDNA are needed to define its clinical utility in diagnosis, prognostication, glioblastoma pseudoprogression, and other scenarios wherein neoadjuvant therapies may be considered.

BACKGROUND:Transorbital endoscopic approaches (TOEAs) have emerged as adjunct and alternatives for accessing the middle cranial fossa (MCF). Nuances of the skull base anatomy from a ventral transorbital endoscopic viewpoint remain to be fully described.OBJECTIVE:To assess the anatomy of the “crista ovale” (COv), described transcranially as the midsubtemporal ridge (MSR), from a ventral transorbital perspective and evaluate its role as a landmark in TOEA to the MCF.METHODS:Lateral TOEAs to the MCF were performed in 20 adult cadaveric heads (40 sides). The presence of the COv/MSR was evaluated under endoscopic visualization. Anatomic relationships between COv/MSR and surrounding structures were assessed. The presence of COv/MSR was also examined in 30 cadaveric head computed tomography (CT) scans (60 sides).RESULTS:The COv/MSR was identified in 98% (39/40) of sides at the MCF, as 1 of 4 major configurations. The COv/MSR was found anterolateral to the foramen ovale and foramen spinosum (mean distance: 9.2 ± SD 2.4 mm and 12.3 ± SD 2.6 mm, respectively) directly anterior or anteromedial to the petrous apex (mean distance: 26.2 ± SD 2.6 mm) and at a mean 47.6 ± SD 4.7 mm from the approach's surgical portal. It was recognized in 95% (57/60) of CT scans.CONCLUSIONThe COv/MSR can be readily identified during TOEA to the MCF and on CT. It serves as a reliable landmark to localize the foramen ovale, foramen spinosum, and petrous apex. Further studies may confirm its surgical significance in transorbital endoscopic procedures.