Introduction: Chronic constipation is a common disorder with a reported prevalence ranging from 3% to 27% in the general population. Several management strategies, including diagnostic tests, empiric treatments, and specific treatments, have been developed. Our aim was to develop European guidelines for the clinical management of constipation.Design: After a thorough review of the literature by experts in relevant fields, including gastroenterologists, surgeons, general practitioners, radiologists, and experts in gastrointestinal motility testing from various European countries, a Delphi consensus process was used to produce statements and practical algorithms for the management of chronic constipation. 2 of 33 | SERRA Et Al. | INTRODUC TI ONChronic constipation is a common disorder with a reported prevalence ranging from 3% to 27% in the general population. 1,2 Its prevalence increases with age 3,4 and consequently is expected to rise over the next few years, 5 in parallel with the predicted increase in longevity of the European population. Constipation is a symptom that may have diverse etiologies, and for this reason, several diagnostic approaches and treatment options are available, ranging from simple lifestyle changes and general measures to sophisticated pharmacological treatments and surgical interventions. 6 In an attempt to unify the health care received by the population across Europe, the European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM) decided to develop European guidelines to help physicians to take the best decisions to improve the quality of health in patients suffering from common functional and motor disorders. In this document, we present the ESNM guidelines for chronic constipation, which are intended to be a useful tool for the management of this condition in the general population in Europe. In order to produce comprehensive guidelines addressing the different aspects related with constipation, experts from European countries working in related fields developed relevant statements after a thorough review of the available literature, and final recommendations and management algorithms were produced following a Delphi consensus process. | ME THODS | ParticipantsA chair (Jordi Serra) and co-chair (Daniel Pohl) were commissioned by the ESNM Steering Committee to develop the guidelines. A panel of 12 experts from different European countries, constituted by gastroenterologists, surgeons, general practitioners, radiologists, and experts in gastrointestinal (GI) motility testing, was invited by the chairs to participate in the development of the guidelines. Each expert was assigned to develop a specific area of the document (see below) and to establish a team with one or two co-workers to complete the assigned task. The final ESNM guidelines working group was composed of 13 experts and 9 co-authors. | The Delphi consensusEach expert and co-worker conducted a thorough review of the literature in their specific field of expertise. The following areas were covered by the different subgrou...
BackgroundEvidence suggests that the gut microbiota play an important role in gastrointestinal problems.AimTo give clinicians a practical reference guide on the role of specified probiotics in managing particular lower gastrointestinal symptoms/problems by means of a systematic review-based consensus.MethodsSystematic literature searching identified randomised, placebo-controlled trials in adults; evidence for each symptom/problem was graded and statements developed (consensus process; 10-member panel). As results cannot be generalised between different probiotics, individual probiotics were identified for each statement.ResultsThirty seven studies were included; mostly on irritable bowel syndrome [IBS; 19 studies; treatment responder rates: 18–80% (specific probiotics), 5–50% (placebo)] or antibiotic-associated diarrhoea (AAD; 10 studies). Statements with 100% agreement and ‘high’ evidence levels indicated that: (i) specific probiotics help reduce overall symptom burden and abdominal pain in some IBS patients; (ii) in patients receiving antibiotics/Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy, specified probiotics are helpful as adjuvants to prevent/reduce the duration/intensity of AAD; (iii) probiotics have favourable safety in patients in primary care. Items with 70–100% agreement and ‘moderate’ evidence were: (i) specific probiotics help relieve overall symptom burden in some patients with diarrhoea-predominant IBS, and reduce bloating/distension and improve bowel movement frequency/consistency in some IBS patients and (ii) with some probiotics, improved symptoms have led to improvement in quality of life.ConclusionsSpecified probiotics can provide benefit in IBS and antibiotic-associated diarrhoea; relatively few studies in other indications suggested benefits warranting further research. This study provides practical guidance on which probiotic to select for a specific problem.
SummaryBackgroundIn 2013, a systematic review and Delphi consensus reported that specific probiotics can benefit adult patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and other gastrointestinal (GI) problems.AimTo update the consensus with new evidence.MethodsA systematic review identified randomised, placebo‐controlled trials published between January 2012 and June 2017. Evidence was graded, previously developed statements were reassessed by an 8‐expert panel, and agreement was reached via Delphi consensus.ResultsA total of 70 studies were included (IBS, 34; diarrhoea associated with antibiotics, 13; diarrhoea associated with Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy, 7; other conditions, 16). Of 15 studies that examined global IBS symptoms as a primary endpoint, 8 reported significant benefits of probiotics vs placebo. Consensus statements with 100% agreement and “high” evidence level indicated that specific probiotics help reduce overall symptom burden and abdominal pain in some patients with IBS and duration/intensity of diarrhoea in patients prescribed antibiotics or H. pylori eradication therapy, and have favourable safety. Statements with 70%‐100% agreement and “moderate” evidence indicated that, in some patients with IBS, specific probiotics help reduce bloating/distension and improve bowel movement frequency/consistency.ConclusionsThis updated review indicates that specific probiotics are beneficial in certain lower GI problems, although many of the new publications did not report benefits of probiotics, possibly due to inclusion of new, less efficacious preparations. Specific probiotics can relieve lower GI symptoms in IBS, prevent diarrhoea associated with antibiotics and H. pylori eradication therapy, and show favourable safety. This study will help clinicians recommend/prescribe probiotics for specific symptoms.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.