Our animal studies suggest that the basal ganglia provide an internal non-specific cue to trigger movement and imply that Parkinson's disease involves a deficiency in this cueing mechanism. Indeed parkinsonian patients typically rely upon external visual cues. To assess the effects of such non-specific cueing mechanisms on movement, we examined patients' utilization of a variety of auditory cues. Ten patients suffering from Parkinson's disease, and their matched controls, pressed buttons at a series of two-way choice points sequentially down a pathway, both when the latter remained illuminated throughout its length, and when it had to be followed from memory alone. In other experimental conditions, auditory cues were also provided, either contingent upon the previous response, at its initiation (a medium level of advance information) or at its completion (a low level of advance information), or as a series of regularly paced (non-contingent) auditory cues (from a metronome). In addition to error data, we recorded down time (DT, time to initiate each next response) and movement time (MT, time to execute each next response). However, both DT and MT measurements showed that parkinsonian patients were enormously disadvantaged by the absence of external cues. While contingent auditory cues were of some help, the performance of patients with Parkinson's disease was dramatically improved by the provision of non-contingent auditory information. Moreover, parkinsonian patients, unlike controls, were greatly affected by the length of individual sub-movements, especially in the absence of external cues. When the pathway to be followed remained illuminated, sub-movement length had little effect. We conclude that for well-learnt, predictable sequences the basal ganglia provide a non-specific internal cue that is necessary for switching between one movement and the next in a movement sequence, and also for development of preparatory activity for each sub-movement in the sequence.
Tourette's syndrome and Huntington's disease have long been clinically associated with attentional deficits. In this study, we aimed to determine the nature and quantify the extent of such deficits. A technique was devised to ascertain the efficiency with which Tourette's syndrome and Huntington's disease patients could shift and direct attention away from naturally expected stimulus-response (S-R) linkages. This was done by varying the relationships formed between stimulus and response location. Attentional efficiency was indicated by relative speed of responding to relevant (congruent) and irrelevant (incongruent) stimuli, in a paradigm developed from the Simon effect. There were five conditions progressively increasing in complexity. The stimuli consisted of left and right pointing arrows and, in some cases, various conditionality manipulations were also employed, such that in the presence of a certain symbol (i.e. 'x') the nature of the response had to be reversed, whereas in the presence of an alternative symbol (i.e. '='), the response was compatible with the direction of the arrow. As predicted, Tourette's syndrome and Huntington's disease patients, regardless of medication or depression status and unlike controls, were particularly disadvantaged in responding to various conflicting S-R configurations. Tourette's syndrome and Huntington's disease patients may experience difficulties in making attentional shifts, or in inhibiting inappropriate responses; they may also be more susceptible (than controls) to the conflict that can arise when the spatial code formed for the stimulus is irrelevant for selecting the appropriate response. We conclude that our findings support the notion that cognitive deficits in Tourette's syndrome and Huntington's disease may stem from abnormalities of the major pathways interconnecting the basal ganglia and the frontal lobes.
The results suggest a decline in motor coordination rather than any simple strategic preference for caution in movement. The hesitancy of movement to some extent parallels that seen in Parkinson's disease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.