SummaryBackgroundRandomised placebo-controlled trials have shown that daily oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tenofovir–emtricitabine reduces the risk of HIV infection. However, this benefit could be counteracted by risk compensation in users of PrEP. We did the PROUD study to assess this effect.MethodsPROUD is an open-label randomised trial done at 13 sexual health clinics in England. We enrolled HIV-negative gay and other men who have sex with men who had had anal intercourse without a condom in the previous 90 days. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive daily combined tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (245 mg) and emtricitabine (200 mg) either immediately or after a deferral period of 1 year. Randomisation was done via web-based access to a central computer-generated list with variable block sizes (stratified by clinical site). Follow-up was quarterly. The primary outcomes for the pilot phase were time to accrue 500 participants and retention; secondary outcomes included incident HIV infection during the deferral period, safety, adherence, and risk compensation. The trial is registered with ISRCTN (number ISRCTN94465371) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02065986).FindingsWe enrolled 544 participants (275 in the immediate group, 269 in the deferred group) between Nov 29, 2012, and April 30, 2014. Based on early evidence of effectiveness, the trial steering committee recommended on Oct 13, 2014, that all deferred participants be offered PrEP. Follow-up for HIV incidence was complete for 243 (94%) of 259 patient-years in the immediate group versus 222 (90%) of 245 patient-years in the deferred group. Three HIV infections occurred in the immediate group (1·2/100 person-years) versus 20 in the deferred group (9·0/100 person-years) despite 174 prescriptions of post-exposure prophylaxis in the deferred group (relative reduction 86%, 90% CI 64–96, p=0·0001; absolute difference 7·8/100 person-years, 90% CI 4·3–11·3). 13 men (90% CI 9–23) in a similar population would need access to 1 year of PrEP to avert one HIV infection. We recorded no serious adverse drug reactions; 28 adverse events, most commonly nausea, headache, and arthralgia, resulted in interruption of PrEp. We detected no difference in the occurrence of sexually transmitted infections, including rectal gonorrhoea and chlamydia, between groups, despite a suggestion of risk compensation among some PrEP recipients.InterpretationIn this high incidence population, daily tenofovir–emtricitabine conferred even higher protection against HIV than in placebo-controlled trials, refuting concerns that effectiveness would be less in a real-world setting. There was no evidence of an increase in other sexually transmitted infections. Our findings strongly support the addition of PrEP to the standard of prevention for men who have sex with men at risk of HIV infection.FundingMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Public Health England, and Gilead Sciences.

Key Points• The frequency of CD161 ϩϩ MAIT cells is dramatically decreased in the blood of HIVinfected patients, and they are nonrecoverable with HAART.• Gut sequestration and apoptosis in response to bacterial signals may, amongst others, be mechanisms that contribute to this. IntroductionThe natural course of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection is associated with progressive immune dysfunction, perturbation of immune-cell subsets and increased opportunistic infections. In early disease, there is a dramatic loss of CD4 ϩ T cells from the gastrointestinal tract resulting in impaired mucosal immunity, reduced peripheral CD4 ϩ T-cell count, and increased systemic T-cell activation. [1][2][3][4] These factors contribute to an increased susceptibility to infection with specific organisms such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Candida albicans. [5][6][7] In addition, more recent evidence suggests an important role for the loss of CD8 ϩ T cells in susceptibility to bacterial pneumonia and all-cause mortality in HIV infection. 8 MAIT cells are a distinct subset of tissue-infiltrating lymphocytes with antibacterial functions that account for up to one-third of the CD8 ϩ T-cell population in the blood of healthy individuals. [9][10][11] MAIT cells are identified by expression of a semi-invariant T-cell receptor (TCR), iV␣7.2, 10,12,13 which recognizes ligands presented by MHC class I related (MR1) protein. 14 MR1 presentation occurs on dendritic cells, monocytes, and lung epithelial cells in response to bacterial pathogens. 9,10,12 MAIT cells are activated in vitro in an MR1-dependent fashion by a range of bacterial and fungal pathogens, including Escherichia coli, M tuberculosis, and C albicans, 9,10 and in mouse models have been shown to provide protection against bacterial infection. 10,15 In addition, MAIT cells have been shown to be lost from the blood and present in the lungs of patients with active tuberculosis, suggesting they may play an important role in host immunity to M tuberculosis. 9,10 Specific subsets of CD4 ϩ and CD8 ϩ T cells, termed Th17 and Tc17, are defined by their ability to produce IL17A and are important in the regulation of mucosal integrity and antibacterial immunity. [16][17][18][19][20] Early in HIV infection, Th17 cells are lost from the gastrointestinal tract, but may be restored through long-term highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) concurrent with a reduction in immune activation levels. 21 The loss of this IL17A and Submitted June 12, 2012; accepted November 26, 2012. Prepublished online as Blood First Edition paper, December 18, 2012; DOI 10.1182 DOI 10. /blood-2012 *C.C. and J.E.U. contributed equally to this work.The online version of this article contains a data supplement.The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. Therefore, and solely to indicate this fact, this article is hereby marked ''advertisement'' in accordance with 18 USC section 1734. For personal use only. on May 7, 2018. by guest www.bloodjournal.org...

Background Data on vaccine immunogenicity against SARS-CoV-2 are needed for the 40 million people globally living with HIV who might have less functional immunity and more associated comorbidities than the general population. We aimed to explore safety and immunogenicity of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine in people with HIV. Methods In this single-arm open-label vaccination substudy within the protocol of the larger phase 2/3 trial COV002, adults aged 18–55 years with HIV were enrolled at two HIV clinics in London, UK. Eligible participants were required to be on antiretroviral therapy (ART), with undetectable plasma HIV viral loads (<50 copies per mL), and CD4 counts of more than 350 cells per μL. A prime-boost regimen of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, with two doses was given 4–6 weeks apart. The primary outcomes for this substudy were safety and reactogenicity of the vaccine, as determined by serious adverse events and solicited local and systemic reactions. Humoral responses were measured by anti-spike IgG ELISA and antibody-mediated live virus neutralisation. Cell-mediated immune responses were measured by ex-vivo IFN-γ enzyme-linked immunospot assay (ELISpot) and T-cell proliferation. All outcomes were compared with an HIV-uninfected group from the main COV002 study within the same age group and dosing strategy and are reported until day 56 after prime vaccination. Outcomes were analysed in all participants who received both doses and with available samples. The COV002 study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04400838 , and is ongoing. Findings Between Nov 5 and Nov 24, 2020, 54 participants with HIV (all male, median age 42·5 years [IQR 37·2–49·8]) were enrolled and received two doses of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. Median CD4 count at enrolment was 694·0 cells per μL (IQR 573·5–859·5). No serious adverse events occurred. Local and systemic reactions occurring during the first 7 days after prime vaccination included pain at the injection site (26 [49%] of 53 participants with available data), fatigue (25 [47%]), headache (25 [47%]), malaise (18 [34%]), chills (12 [23%]), muscle ache (19 [36%]), joint pain (five [9%]), and nausea (four [8%]), the frequencies of which were similar to the HIV-negative participants. Anti-spike IgG responses by ELISA peaked at day 42 (median 1440 ELISA units [EUs; IQR 704–2728]; n=50) and were sustained until day 56 (median 941 EUs [531–1445]; n=49). We found no correlation between the magnitude of the anti-spike IgG response at day 56 and CD4 cell count (p=0·93) or age (p=0·48). ELISpot and T-cell proliferative responses peaked at day 14 and 28 after prime dose and were sustained to day 56. Compared with participants without HIV, we found no difference in magnitude or persistence of SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific humoral or cellular responses (p>0·05 for all analyses). Interpretation In this study of people with HIV, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 was ...