Background:Hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond the Milan criteria is shown to be beneficial. However, a high rate of post-operative HCC recurrence hinders the long-term survival of the patients. This study aimed to investigate and compare the impacts of tenofovir (TDF) and entecavir (ETV) on the recurrence of hepatitis B viral (HBV)-related HCC beyond the Milan criteria.Methods:Data pertaining to 1532 patients who underwent hepatectomy and received antiviral therapy between January 2014 and January 2019 were collected from five centers. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) analysis was performed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to determine prognostic factors for HCC recurrence.Results:The analysis incorporates 595 HBV-related HCC patients. The overall 5-year RFS was 21.3%. Among them, 533 and 62 patients received ETV and TDF treatment, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year RFS rates were 46.3%, 27.4%, and 19.6%, respectively, in the ETV group compared with 65.1%, 41.8%, and 37.2%, respectively, in the TDF group (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that TDF treatment (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.604, P = 0.005), cirrhosis (HR: 1.557, P = 0.004), tumor size (HR: 1.037, P = 0.008), microvascular invasion (MVI) (HR: 1.403, P = 0.002), portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) (HR: 1.358, P = 0.012), capsular invasion (HR: 1.228, P = 0.040), and creatinine levels (CREA) (HR: 0.993, P = 0.031) were statistically significant prognostic factors associated with RFS.Conclusions:Patients with HCC beyond the Milan criteria exhibited a high rate of HCC recurrence after hepatectomy. Compared to the ETV therapy, TDF administration significantly lowered the risk of HCC recurrence.

No abstract

Background and AimsWith changes in dietary patterns and modern lifestyles, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-associated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients is increasing. The purpose of our study is to explore the impact of MetS on the prognosis of HBV-associated HCC patients following radical hepatectomy.MethodsData on consecutive HCC patients who underwent radical hepatectomy were prospectively obtained and retrospectively analyzed from seven medical centers in west areas of China. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted to balance the heterogeneity between MetS-HBV-HCC group and HBV-HCC group. Surgical outcomes have been contrasted between the two groups.ResultsIn 984 patients, 179 (18.19%) were diagnosed with MetS. Patients in the MetS-HBV-HCC group had higher CCI score (8.7 [0.0, 12.2] vs. 0.0 [0.0, 8.7], p = 0.048) and a higher rate of severe complications (Clavien–Dindo ≥3, 7.82% vs. 4.10%, p = 0.035), to be more precise: postoperative liver failure, hydrothorax, and hyperglycemia. Patients in the MetS-HBV-HCC group tended to have worse 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (61.45% vs. 69.94%, p = 0.027) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate (62.57% vs. 53.66%, p = 0.030), consistent with the results of the competing risk models. Last, MetS was identified to be an independent unfavorable prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis.ConclusionThe involvement of MetS increased the risk of postoperative complications and worsens the overall survival and recurrence-free survival time, reminding us to be more prudent to face metabolic disorder among tumor patients.

BackgroundCombining two immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) instead of using one can effectively improve the prognosis of advanced malignant tumors. At present, ipilimumab alongside nivolumab is the most widely used combinatorial regimen of ICIs. However, the risk of treatment-related adverse events is higher in combinatorial regimens than in single-drug regimens. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the risks of common adverse events associated with the combinatorial regimen of ipilimumab and nivolumab by using meta-analysis.MethodsWe searched Pubmed, Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for reports published by 30 September 2021. A randomized controlled study was developed and analyzed using the statistical software R to determine the efficacy of the combinatorial treatment. Risk estimates (hazard ratios, RR) and 95% confidence intervals for various common serious adverse events were used.ResultsA total of 23 randomized control trials (n = 3970 patients) were included. Our meta-analysis indicated the risks of adverse events of any grade and grade ≥ 3 as 90.42% (95%CI: 85.91% ~ 94.18%) and 46.46% (95%CI: 39.37% ~ 53.69%), respectively; the risks of treatment-related death and adverse events leading to discontinuation were estimated at 0.42% (95% CI, 0.18% ~ 0.72%) and 19.11% (95% CI, 14.99% ~ 24.38%), respectively. Classification of 19 common adverse events. The top 5 grade 1-2 adverse events were found to be fatigue (30.92%, 95% CI: 24.59% ~ 37.62%), pruritus (26.05%, 95%CI: 22.29%~29.99%), diarrhea (23.58%, 95% CI: 20.62% ~ 26.96%), rash (19.90%, 95%CI: 15.75% ~ 25.15%), and nausea (17.19%, 95% CI:13.7% ~ 21.57%). The top 5 grade ≥ 3 adverse events were identified as increased alanine aminotransferase(8.12%, 95% CI: 5.90%~10.65%), increased lipase(7.62%, 95% CI: 4.88% ~ 10.89%), and colitis (6.39%, 95%CI: 3.98% ~ 10.25%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (6.30%, 95% CI: 4.61% ~ 8.22%), and diarrhea(5.72%, 95%CI: 3.50% ~ 8.44%). Subgroup analysis revealed some differences in the adverse events between the N1-I3 and N3-I1 subgroups and between subgroups of different cancer types.ConclusionThis study summarized the risks of common adverse events in the co-treatment of malignant-tumor patients with ipilimumab and nivolumab and identified the impacts of various initial administration schemes on the risks of such events, thereby providing an important reference for the toxicity of co-treatment with ipilimumab and nivolumab.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42020181350.