The carotid bodies are sensitive to glucose in vitro and can be stimulated to cause hyperglycemia in vivo. The aim of this study was to determine if the carotid bodies are involved in basal glucoregulation or the counterregulatory response to an insulin-induced decrement in arterial glucose in vivo. Dogs were surgically prepared >16 days before the experiment. The carotid bodies and their associated nerves were removed (carotid body resected [CBR]) or left intact (Sham), and infusion and sampling catheters were implanted. Removal of carotid bodies was verified by the absence of a ventilatory response to NaCN. Experiments were performed in 18-h fasted conscious dogs and consisted of a tracer ([3-3 H]glucose) equilibration period (-120 to -40 min), a basal period (-40 to 0 min), and an insulin infusion (1 mU · kg -1 · min -1 ) period (0-150 min) during which glucose was infused as needed to clamp at mildly hypoglycemic (65 mg/dl) or euglycemic (105 mg/dl) levels. Basal (8 µU/ml) and clamp (40 µU/ml) insulin levels were similar in both groups. Basal arterial glucagon was reduced in CBR compared with Sham (30 ± 2 vs. 40 ± 2 pg/ml) and remained reduced in CBR during hypoglycemia (peak levels of 36 ± 3 vs. 52 ± 7 pg/ml). Cortisol levels were not significantly different between the 2 groups in the basal state, but were reduced during the hypoglycemic clamp in CBR. Catecholamine levels were not significantly different between the 2 groups in the basal and hypoglycemic periods. The glucose infusion rate required to clamp glucose at 65 mg/dl was 2.5-fold greater in CBR compared with Sham T here is considerable uncertainty as to the site at which decrements in blood glucose are sensed. Sites in the brain (1), portal vein (2,3), liver (4), and pancreas (5) are all sensitive to blood glucose. Despite intensive investigation, however, the physiological role of these glucose-sensitive regions are highly controversial because no one site can completely explain the full counterregulatory response to hypoglycemia.We tested the hypothesis that the carotid bodies (or receptors near this site) are instrumental in detecting a decrement in blood glucose. This hypothesis was based on evidence that 1) the carotid bodies can detect glucose (6-8), 2) the carotid bodies have the "circuitry" to provide input to centers involved in glucoregulation (7-10), and 3) the carotid bodies have unique physiological characteristics making them potentially highly sensitive to changes in blood glucose content (high blood flow and metabolic rate per gram tissue) (11).To examine the role of the carotid bodies (or receptors anatomically near them), carotid body resected (CBR) conscious dogs or dogs having undergone a sham surgery (Sham) were studied in the basal state and during hyperinsulinemic, euglycemic, or hypoglycemic clamps. Isotope dilution methods were used to calculate glucose kinetics. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSAnimal maintenance and surgical procedures. Mongrel dogs (n = 23, mean weight 25.1 ± 0.6 kg) of either sex that had been fed a standard...
OBJECTIVEEarly after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), there is improvement in type 2 diabetes, which is characterized by insulin resistance. We determined the acute effects of RYGB, with and without omentectomy, on hepatic and peripheral insulin sensitivity. We also investigated whether preoperative diabetes or postoperative diabetes remission influenced tissue-specific insulin sensitivity after RYGB.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSWe studied 40 obese (BMI 48 ± 8 kg/m2) participants, 17 with diabetes. Participants were randomized to RYGB alone or in conjunction with omentectomy. Hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamps with isotopic-tracer infusion were completed at baseline and at 1 month postoperatively to assess insulin sensitivity.RESULTSParticipants lost 11 ± 4% of body weight at 1 month after RYGB, without an improvement in peripheral insulin sensitivity; these outcomes were not affected by omentectomy, preoperative diabetes, or remission of diabetes. Hepatic glucose production (HGP) and the hepatic insulin sensitivity index improved in all subjects, irrespective of omentectomy (P ≤ 0.001). Participants with diabetes had higher baseline HGP values (P = 0.003) that improved to a greater extent after RYGB (P = 0.006). Of the 17 participants with diabetes, 10 (59%) had remission at 1 month. Diabetes remission had a group × time effect (P = 0.041) on HGP; those with diabetes remission had lower preoperative and postoperative HGP.CONCLUSIONSPeripheral insulin sensitivity did not improve 1 month after RYGB, irrespective of omentectomy, diabetes, or diabetes remission. Hepatic insulin sensitivity improved at 1 month after RYGB and was more pronounced in patients with diabetes. Improvement in HGP may influence diabetes remission early after RYGB.
This study was aimed at assessing the role of carotid body function in neuroendocrine and glucoregulatory responses to exercise. The carotid bodies and associated nerves were removed (CBR, n = 6) or left intact (Sham, n = 6) in anesthetized dogs >16 days before experiments, and infusion and sampling catheters were implanted. Conscious dogs were studied at rest and during 150 min of exercise. Isotopic dilution was used to assess glucose production (R(a)) and disappearance (R(d)). Arterial glucagon was reduced in CBR compared with Sham at rest (29 +/- 3 vs. 47 +/- 3 pg/ml). During exercise, glucagon increased more in Sham than in CBR (47 +/- 9 vs. 15 +/- 2 pg/ml). Cortisol and epinephrine levels were similar in the two groups at rest and during exercise. Basal norepinephrine was similar in CBR and Sham. During exercise, norepinephrine increased by 432 +/- 124 pg/ml in Sham, but by only 201 +/- 28 pg/ml in CBR. Basal arterial plasma glucose was 108 +/- 2 and 105 +/- 2 mg/dl in CBR and Sham, respectively. Arterial glucose dropped by 10 +/- 3 mg/dl at onset of exercise in CBR (P < 0.01) but was unchanged in Sham (decrease of 3 +/- 2 mg/dl, not significant). Basal glucose kinetics were equal in Sham and CBR. At onset of exercise, R(a) and R(d) were transiently uncoupled in CBR (i.e., R(d) > R(a)) but were closely matched in Sham. In steady-state exercise, R(a) and R(d) were closely matched in both groups. Insulin was equal in the basal period and decreased similarly during exercise. These studies suggest that input from the carotid bodies, or receptors anatomically close to them, 1) is important in control of basal glucagon and the exercise-induced increment in glucagon, 2) is involved in the sympathetic response to exercise, and 3) participates in the non-steady-state coupling of R(a) to R(d), but 4) is not essential to glucoregulation during sustained exercise.
Measurement of fractional lipogenesis by mass isotopomer distribution analysis (MIDA) of fatty acids or cholesterol labeled from [(13)C]acetate assumes constant enrichment of lipogenic acetyl-CoA in all hepatocytes. This would not be the case if uptake and release of acetate by the liver resulted in transhepatic gradients of acetyl-CoA enrichment. Conscious dogs, prefitted with transhepatic catheters, were infused with glucose and [1, 2-(13)C(2)]acetate. Stable concentrations and enrichments of acetate were measured in artery (17 microM, 36%), portal vein (61 microM, 5. 4%), and hepatic vein (17 microM, 1.0%) and were computed for mixed blood entering the liver (53 microM, 7.4%). We also measured balances of propionate and butyrate across gut and liver. All gut release of propionate and butyrate is taken up by the liver. The threefold decrease in acetate concentration and the sevenfold decrease in acetate enrichment across the liver strongly suggest that the enrichment of lipogenic acetyl-CoA decreases across the liver. Thus fractional hepatic lipogenesis measured in vivo by MIDA may be underestimated.
To determine the contributions of transporter-mediated and passive absorption during an intraduodenal glucose infusion in a large animal model, six mongrel dogs had sampling catheters (portal vein, femoral artery, duodenum), infusion catheters (vena cava, duodenum) and a portal vein flow probe implanted 17 d before an experiment. Protocols consisted of a basal (-30 to 0 min) and an experimental (0-90 min) period. An intraduodenal glucose infusion of 44 micromol/(kg. min) was initiated at t = 0 min. At t = 20 and 80 min, 3-O-[3H]methylglucose and L-[14C]glucose (L-Glc) were injected intraduodenally. Phloridzin, an inhibitor of the Na+/K+ ATP-dependent transporter (SGLT1), was infused from t = 60 to 90 min in the presence of a peripheral isoglycemic clamp. Net gut glucose output was 21.1 +/- 3.0 micromol/(kg. min) from t = 0 to 60 min. Transporter-mediated glucose absorption was calculated using three approaches, which involved either direct measurements or indirect estimates of duodenal glucose analog radioactivities, to account for the assumptions and difficulties inherent to duodenal sampling. Values were essentially the same regardless of calculations used because transporter-mediated absorption was 89 +/- 1%, 90 +/- 2% and 91 +/- 2% of net gut glucose output. Phloridzin-induced inhibition of transporter-mediated absorption completely abolished passive absorption of L-Glc. We conclude that in dogs, transporter-mediated glucose absorption constitutes the vast majority of glucose absorbed from the gut and is required for passive glucose absorption. The method described here is applicable to investigation of the mechanisms of gut glucose absorption under a variety of nutritional, physiologic and pathophysiologic conditions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.