BACKGROUND: There has been a dramatic rise in opioid abuse, and diversion of excess, unused prescriptions is a major contributor. We assess the impact of implementing a new standardized pain care bundle to reduce postoperative opioids in outpatient general surgical procedures. STUDY DESIGN: This study was designed to demonstrate non-inferiority for the primary end point: patientreported average pain in the first 7 postoperative days. We prospectively evaluated 224 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy or open hernia repair (inguinal, umbilical) pre-intervention to 192 patients post-intervention. We implemented a multimodal intra-and postoperative analgesic bundle, including promoting co-analgesia, opioid-reduced prescriptions, and patient education designed to clarify patient expectations. Patients completed a brief pain inventory at their first postoperative visit. Groups were compared using chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, and independent samples t-test, where appropriate. RESULTS: No difference was seen in average postoperative pain scores in the pre-vs post-intervention groups (2.3 vs 2.1 of 10; p ¼ 0.12). The reported quality of pain control improved postintervention (good/very good pain control in 69% vs 85%; p < 0.001). The median total morphine equivalents for prescriptions filled in the post-intervention group were significantly less (100; interquartile range 75 to 116 pre-intervention vs 50; interquartile range 50 to 50 post-intervention; p < 0.001). Only 78 of 172 (45%) patients filled their opioid prescription in the post-intervention group (p < 0.001), with no significant difference in prescription renewals (3.5% pre-intervention vs 2.6% post-intervention; p ¼ 0.62). CONCLUSIONS: For outpatient open hernia repair and cholecystectomy, a standardized pain care bundle decreased opioid prescribing significantly and frequently eliminated opioid use, while adequately treating postoperative pain and improving patient satisfaction.

Intra-abdominal hypertension is common in both surgical and nonsurgical patients in the intensive care setting and was found to be independently associated with mortality. Despite prior reports to the contrary, intra-abdominal hypertension develops in nonventilated patients and in patients who do not have intra-abdominal hypertension at admission. Intra-abdominal pressure monitoring is inexpensive, provides valuable clinical information, and there may be a role for its routine measurement in the ICU. Future work should evaluate the impact of early interventions for patients with intra-abdominal hypertension.

No abstract

Background: Acute care surgical services provide comprehensive emergency general surgical care while potentially using health care resources more efficiently. We assessed the volume and distribution of emergency general surgery (EGS) procedures before and after the implementation of the Acute Care and Emergency Surgery Service (ACCESS) at a Canadian tertiary care hospital and its effect on surgeon billings.Methods: This single-centre retrospective case-control study compared adult patients who underwent EGS procedures between July and December 2009 (pre-ACCESS), to those who had surgery between July and December 2010 (post-ACCESS). Case distribution was compared between day (7 am to 3 pm), evening (3 pm to 11 pm) and night (11 pm to 7 am). Frequencies were compared using the χ 2 test.Results: Pre-ACCESS, 366 EGS procedures were performed: 24% during the day, 55% in the evening and 21% at night. Post-ACCESS, 463 operations were performed: 55% during the day, 36% in the evening and 9% at night. Reductions in night-time and evening EGS were 57% and 36% respectively (p < 0.001). Total surgeon billings for operations pre-and post-ACCESS were $281 066 and $287 075, respectively: remuneration was $6008 higher post-ACCESS for an additional 97 cases (p = 0.003). Using cost-modelling analysis, post-ACCESS surgeon billing for appendectomies, segmental colectomies, laparotomies and cholecystectomies all declined by $67 190, $125 215, $66 362, and $84 913, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion:Acute care surgical services have dramatically shifted EGS from nighttime to daytime. Cost-modelling analysis demonstrates that these services have costsavings potential for the health care system without reducing overall surgeon billing.

We sought to characterize the consent process for transfusion and determine its impact on patients' knowledge and level of comfort with receiving blood. We identified all adult patients who had received blood transfusion at a tertiary care centre over 3 months. Patients who were discharged each received a survey that assessed their (1) recall of the consent process, (2) recall of information conveyed, (3) assessment of the discussion's understandability and (4) perceived knowledge of as well as comfort level with transfusion as a result of the discussion. Overall, 80% of respondents recalled discussing and signing an informed consent. Information was mostly conveyed by attending physicians (35%) and consent obtained in the patient's hospital room (38%) or the preadmission clinic (19%). Although the majority recalled the consent process, many did not recall the discussion of specific transfusion risks or alternatives to donor blood (88%). Although the majority felt the discussion was at least somewhat understandable (77%), only 35% felt better informed and more comfortable with accepting blood. Despite implementation of written informed consent for transfusion, patients' recollection and understanding of risks and alternatives remain poor. This suggests the need for improving risk communication.