Background?The absence of suitable adjacent recipient vessels for microvascular anastomosis due to trauma poses a major challenge to the reconstructive surgeon. The anterior and posterior tibial vessels of the contralateral leg are the two other alternatives for use as recipient vessels for microvascular anastomosis. This method is known as the cross-leg free flap.
Methods?Twenty-seven patients (20 males, 7 females) underwent cross-leg free flap operations due to absence of a suitable adjacent recipient vessel between 2007 and 2015. The mean soft tissue defect dimension was 12???11 cm (smallest: 6???7 cm; largest: 20 ?14 cm). Gustilo type 3B tibia fractures were present in 19 patients, but no fractures were present in the other 8. Six different flaps were used: 14 anterolateral thigh flaps, 6 latissimus dorsi flaps, 3 gracilis muscle flaps, 2 vastus lateralis musculocutaneous flaps, 1 tensor fascia latae flap, and 1 deep inferior epigastric perforator flap.
Results?Two anterolateral thigh flaps failed, while the rest of the flaps survived completely. There were no donor-site complications.
Conclusion?We think that the cross-leg free flap method can be safely and successfully used with all flap types in complex lower extremity injuries in which the adjacent recipient vessel option is unavailable.
Hemodilution was an effective way of providing better microcirculatory blood perfusion, increasing significantly the flap survival rate in the authors' microsurgical model.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.