• Rh serologic phenotype-matched transfusions from minority donors do not prevent all Rh alloimmunization in patients with SCD.• Variant RH genes are common in patients with SCD and contribute to Rh alloimmunization and transfusion reactions.Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is a key treatment of patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) but remains complicated by RBC immunization. In the present study, we evaluated the effects of antigen matching for Rh D, C, and E, and K and transfusion from African American donors in 182 patients with SCD. Overall, 71 (58%) chronic and 9 (15%) episodically transfused patients were alloimmunized. Fifty-five (45%) chronic and 7 (12%) episodically transfused patients were Rh immunized. Of 146 antibodies identified, 91 were unexplained Rh antibodies, one-third of which were associated with laboratory evidence of delayed transfusion reactions. Fifty-six antibodies occurred in patients whose RBCs were phenotypically positive for the corresponding Rh antigen and 35 in patients whose RBCs lacked the antigen and were transfused with Rh-matched RBCs. High-resolution RH genotyping revealed variant alleles in 87% of individuals. These data describe the prevalence of Rh alloimmunization in patients with SCD transfused with phenotypic Rh-matched African American RBCs. Our results suggest that altered RH alleles in both the patients and in the donors contributed to Rh alloimmunization in this study. Whether RH genotyping of patients and minority donors will reduce Rh alloimmunization in SCD needs to be examined. (Blood. 2013;122 (6):1062-1071
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a pleiotropic genetic disorder of hemoglobin that has profound multi-organ effects. The low prevalence of SCD (~100,000/US) has limited progress in clinical, basic, and translational research. Lack of a large, readily accessible population for clinical studies has contributed to the absence of standard definitions and diagnostic criteria for the numerous complications of SCD and inadequate understanding of SCD pathophysiology. In 2005, the Comprehensive Sickle Cell Centers initiated a project to establish consensus definitions of the most frequently occurring complications. A group of clinicians and scientists with extensive expertise in research and treatment of SCD gathered to identify and categorize the most common complications. From this group, a formal writing team was formed that further reviewed the literature, sought specialist input, and produced definitions in a standard format. This manuscript provides an overview of the process and describes twelve body system categories and the most prevalent or severe complications within these categories. A detailed Appendix provides standardized definitions for all complications identified within each system. This report proposes use of these definitions for studies of SCD complications, so future studies can be comparably robust and treatment efficacy measured. Use of these definitions will support greater accuracy in genotype-phenotype studies, thereby achieving a better understanding of SCD pathophysiology. This should nevertheless be viewed as a dynamic rather than final document; phenotype descriptions should be reevaluated and revised periodically to provide the most current standard definitions as etiologic factors are better understood and new diagnostic options are developed.
Background-Pediatric health-related quality of life (HRQOL) questionnaires have been validated in children with sickle cell disease (SCD), but small sample sizes in these studies have limited clinical comparisons. We used the baseline clinical data from the Collaborative Data (CData) Project of the Comprehensive Sickle Cell Centers (CSCC) Clinical Trial Consortium to perform a detailed, descriptive study of HRQOL using the PedsQL™ version 4.0 generic core and fatigue scales.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.