Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is an antimalarial drug used as chemoprophylaxis against malaria caused byPlasmodium vivax in the Republic of Korea Army (ROKA). In this study, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK) of HCQ and its metabolites and the relationship between the PK of HCQ and the effect of treatment of HCQ on vivax malaria in South Koreans. Three PK studies of HCQ were conducted with 91 healthy subjects and patients with vivax malaria. Plasma concentrations were analyzed by noncompartmental and mixed-effect modeling approaches. A two-compartment model with first-order absorption best described the data. The clearance and the central and peripheral volumes of distribution were 15.5 liters/h, 733 liters, and 1,630 liters, respectively. We measured the plasma concentrations of HCQ in patients with prophylactic failure of HCQ and compared them with the prediction intervals of the simulated concentrations for HCQ from the final PK model built in this study. In 71% of the patients with prophylactic failure, the plasma concentrations of HCQ were below the lower bounds of the 95% prediction interval, while only 8% of them showed higher levels than the upper bounds of the 95% prediction interval. We report that a significant cause of prophylactic failure among the individuals in ROKA was ascribed to plasma concentrations of HCQ lower than those predicted by the PK model. However, prophylactic failure despite sufficient plasma concentrations of HCQ was confirmed in several individuals, warranting continued surveillance to monitor changes in the HCQ susceptibility of Plasmodium vivax in the Republic of Korea.

Summary Background Tegoprazan (CJ‐12420) is a potassium‐competitive acid blocker (P‐CAB) with therapeutic potential for gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) by reversibly suppressing gastric H+/K+‐ATPase. Aims To investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tegoprazan Methods A phase I, randomised, double‐blind and placebo‐controlled clinical trial was conducted in 56 healthy male subjects without Helicobacter pylori infection. In the single ascending dose study, 50, 100, 200 and 400 mg tegoprazan were administered to 32 subjects. In the multiple ascending dose study, 100 and 200 mg tegoprazan were administered every 24 hours to each of the eight subjects for 7 days. In the comparative pharmacodynamics study, 40 mg esomeprazole was administered to eight subjects every 24 hours for 7 days. The assessment included safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics through monitoring of 24‐hour gastric pH and pharmacokinetics of tegoprazan in plasma and urine. Results Tegoprazan was generally well tolerated. Most adverse events reported in the study were mild in intensity and resolved without any sequelae. Exposure to tegoprazan increased in a dose‐proportional manner. Multiple dosing with tegoprazan showed no accumulation in plasma on day 7. The pharmacodynamic analysis revealed that tegoprazan showed rapid, dose‐dependent gastric acid suppression. Conclusions Tegoprazan was well tolerated and showed rapid and potent gastric acid suppression. This supports the further development of tegoprazan as a treatment for acid‐related disorders.

Intravenous (i.v.) busulfan can produce a more consistent pharmacokinetic profile than oral formulations can, but nonetheless, significant interpatient variability is evident. We investigated the influence of polymorphisms of 3 GST isozyme genes (GSTA1, GSTM1, and GSTT1) on i.v. busulfan clearance. Fifty-eight adult patients who received 3.2 mg/kg/day of busulfan as conditioning for hematopoietic cell transplantation were included in this study. Stepwise multiple linear regression demonstrated that GSTA1 variant GSTA1∗B (P = .004), GSTM1/GSTT1 double-null genotype (P = .039), and actual body weight (P = .001) were significantly associated with lower clearance of i.v. busulfan. A trend test analyzing the overall effect of GST genotype on busulfan pharmacokinetics, combining GSTA1 gene polymorphism and the number of GSTM1- and GSTT-null genotypes, showed a significant correlation between GST genotype and busulfan clearance (P = .001). The clearance of i.v. busulfan was similar between patients with GSTA1∗A/∗A and GSTM1/GSTT1 double-null genotypes and those with GSTA1∗A/∗B and GSTM1/GSTT1 double-positive genotypes. In conclusion, a pharmacogenetic approach using GST gene polymorphisms may be valuable in optimizing the i.v. busulfan dosage scheme. Our results also highlight the importance of including polygenic analyses and addressing interactions among isozyme genes in pharmacogenetic studies.