BackgroundNoncommunicable diseases (NCDs) were responsible for 72.3% of global deaths in 2016, with cardiovascular diseases accounting for almost half of those deaths and low- and middle-income countries carrying the biggest burden. As a result, the prevention and control of NCDs is recognized as urgent, while better surveillance at the country level could result in more effective policies. Hence, the objective of this study was to obtain more detailed information on the distribution of the prevalence of hypertension and diabetes among the population of two large districts of the city of São Paulo in Brazil, and to compare these findings to the results of a citywide health survey.Methods and findingsThis cross-sectional study used primary health care (PHC) routinely-collected data. The study population included 187,110 individuals 20 years of age or older registered in 13 public PHC facilities at two districts of the city of São Paulo in 2015. Data extracted from SIAB, a primary care database, was used to calculate age and sex directly standardized prevalences for diabetes and hypertension for each PHC facility. The prevalence of hypertension among women was significantly higher than the prevalence among men in the entire study population, and in every PHC facility. There was great variation among PHC facilities that was more pronounced among women. The prevalence of diabetes among women was significantly higher than the prevalence among men in the entire study population, and in every PHC facility, but there was little variation among PHC facilities.ConclusionsThis study provided information that could help with policy planning and allocation of resources, and demonstrated the use of PHC routinely-collected data to generate important insights that if replicated could have a substantial impact given the broad coverage of the national public PHC program in Brazil.
Introduction Although it is already known that 14% of the global disease burden is attributed to Mental, neurological and substance use disorders, three quarters of people affected by mental disorders in low-income countries do not access treatment. Launched by WHO in 2008, the mhGAP Intervention Guide is a simple technical tool based on scientific evidence which facilitates the management of priority mental health conditions, using protocols for clinical decision in the PHC centers. Objective This work aims to describe the methodology of training the primary care staff and specialized mental health workers from São Paulo, Brazil, in the mhGAP Intervention Guide. Methods The training was designed in three steps. In the first step, mhGAP Training of Trainers and Supervisors (ToTS) capacitated 76 trainers. In the second a working group (WG) responsible for planning the replication for 100% of the technical staff of 13 PHC centers and 3 mental health community services was formed. The WG defined that the trainers should attend in two alignment moments to guarantee uniformity. And the third stage is the replication, divided in nine groups with forty participants, throughout the year 2020. Results The training promotes the exchange of experiences between the participants, who share their personal experiences, enriching the discussions. They also approximate the relationship between PHC and Mental Health services, as well as favors the interdisciplinary and collaborative practice. The PHC workers are more aware of their responsibility in mental health care and feel more empowered. As a challenge, the PHC professionals showed insecurity and reluctance to give the training. Conclusions The training provides evidence-based tools for the assessment and integrated management of priority mental disorders by PHC professionals. Key messages The mhGAP Intervention Guide training strengths the relationship between Primary Care and Mental Health services and improves Mental Health treatment access. The training improves integrated management of priority mental disorders by PHC professionals.
Background The four essential attributes of primary health care (PHC): access, longitudinality, comprehensiveness and coordination, guide the professional practices of service management and also the professionals of the family health strategy teams. Family medicine residence (FMR) is the speciality that trains medical practitioners capable of acting properly in PHC. It develops a person-centred approach, oriented towards the individual, his family and community, which dialogues with the PHC precepts of comprehensive patient care from a social point of view. Thus, the objective of this study was to verify whether there are differences in the PHC attributes perceived by patients treated by teams with FMR doctors and by the others. Methods This was an observed cross-sectional study conducted during 2019, which used the Adult Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool) to evaluate preliminarily 28 PHC teams working at the city of São Paulo, Brazil. The teams were compared based on 337 patient answers using domains medians and Mann-Whitney tests. The study was approved by the ethics committee. Results Eight teams (28.6%) had doctors trained in FMR. The attributes of longitudinality and access were very similar between the two groups. The teams with FMR doctors showed better evaluations in the components: information systems, median 7.78, versus 6.67 (p = 0.391); services available, median 6.52, versus 6.06 (p = 0.086); and services received, median 4.85, versus 3.85 (p = 0.180) of the coordination and comprehensiveness attributes. Conclusions We didn't find statistically significant results indicating better PHC attributes of teams with FMR doctors, based on user perception. A continuous study is recommended to follow the evolution of this speciality in the PHC context. Key messages FMR is a fundamental key to PHC and must be evaluated continuously. It is necessary to strengthen their insertion in the Brazilian health system and discuss the ways to do so.
Issue Real-time access to up-to-date population information is essential to the strategic planning of primary health care (PHC). In the Brazilian public health system community-based health workers (CHWs), working as part of PHC teams, collect health, demographic and socio-economic data from individuals mainly through paper-based forms that are later entered manually into electronic information systems. Mobile applications could help to improve the quality and speed of this process facilitating the CHWs day-to-day work while improving the access to the collected information. Description of the Problem During September of 2019, a mobile application installed in tablets for the collection of health, demographic and socio-economic data was deployed for 432 CHWs of 87 PHC teams in the southern region of São Paulo, Brazil, serving a total population of 283,324 individuals. During implementation, the acceptability and challenges faced by CHWs were evaluated and the time taken to complete data entry. Results Seventy-two hours of training were offered to CHWs and other 139 professionals including managers, nurses and administrative staff (AS). Some CHWs reported concerns about the process change and fear of not being able to operate the application, especially those unfamiliar to the technology. With training and team support, fear was transformed into satisfaction with the realization of the benefits of the system. The main infrastructure challenge was the need for installation of Wi-Fi routers in some health care units, in addition to the replacement 4.4% of damaged tablets. In four months 97.6% of the total population was registered in the application. Lessons A WhatsApp group was created to clarify AS doubts, receive suggestions and disseminate guidelines. AS remained as the reference point at healthcare units and data completeness still needs to be reinforced. Key messages A mobile application was well-accepted by CHWs and could facilitate the collection of population data. A tablet app proved to be a useful tool to generate information for the PHC teams.
Background Measuring the structure and processes of healthcare services form the basis of improvement efforts and make it possible to hold organizations accountable for the services they provide. Besides having a positive impact in different health outcomes, primary health care (PHC) could also affect experiences in secondary and tertiary care through its coordinating role, therefore efforts to assess the quality of the delivery of its services are important. Hence, the study objectives were to evaluate the PHC attributes of PHC teams and the correlation of these attributes with different health outcomes. Methods This was a cross-sectional study conducted during 2019, which used the Adult Primary Care Assessment Tool (PCATool) to evaluate 28 PHC teams working on the public healthcare sector at the city of São Paulo, Brazil. The Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the association between each PCATool dimension and referral rates, hypertension, diabetes, prenatal care and gestational outcomes. The study was approved by the local ethics committee. Results A statistically significant positive correlation was identified between controlled hypertension and care coordination (rho=0.396; 95% CI:0.012-0.678; p = 0.036), and between 6 or more prenatal care visits and comprehensive care (rho=0.441; 95% CI:0.063-0.708; p = 0.018). A statistically significant negative correlation was identified between low birth weight and care coordination (rho=-0.502; 95% CI:-0.748- -0.136; p = 0.006) and between referral rates and comprehensive care (rho=-0.499; 95%CI:-0.753- -0.114); p = 0.009). Conclusions This study reinforces the importance of the PHC attributes for different relevant health outcomes and of their continuous evaluation for services improvement. Key messages The quality of PHC attributes has a direct impact on different relevant health outcomes. Ways to improve the PHC performance must be considered based on its attributes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.