The analysis provided insights into the conditions under which either fixed or body weight-based dosing would be superior in reducing pharmacokinetic variability and exposure differences between light and heavy subjects across the population. The pharmacokinetic variability introduced by either dosing regimen is moderate relative to the variability generally observed in pharmacodynamics, efficacy and safety. Therefore, mAb dosing can be flexible. Given many practical advantages, fixed dosing is recommended to be the first option in first-in-human studies with mAbs. The dosing strategy in later stages of clinical development could then be determined based on combined knowledge of the body weight effect on pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy from the early clinical trials.

PURPOSE. To characterize ranibizumab pharmacokinetics in patients with AMD. METHODS.A population approach of nonlinear mixed-effect pharmacokinetic modeling based on concentration-time data from 2993 serum samples from 674 AMD patients enrolled in 5 phase 1 to 3 clinical trials of single or multiple intravitreal (ITV) doses of ranibizumab (0.3-2.0 mg/eye) administered biweekly or monthly for up to 24 months. RESULTS.A total of 696 concentration-time records from 229 subjects with one or more measurable total serum ranibizumab concentrations were analyzed. The systemic concentration-time data for ranibizumab were best described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption into and first-order elimination from the systemic circulation. Vitreous elimination half-life (t 1/2 ) was calculated to be 9 days and the intrinsic systemic elimination t 1/2 was calculated to be approximately 2 hours. Following ITV administration, ranibizumab egresses slowly into the systemic circulation, resulting in an apparent serum t 1/2 of 9 days. Systemic-to-vitreous exposure ratio was estimated to be 1:90,000. With monthly and quarterly ITV regimens, the serum concentrations of ranibizumab at steadystate for both the 0.3 and 0.5 mg/eye dose levels were estimated to be below the range needed to inhibit VEGF-A-induced endothelial cell proliferation in vitro by 50% at all times.CONCLUSIONS. Systemic exposure to ranibizumab after ITV injection was very low due to elimination on reaching systemic circulation from the vitreous. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of data from a representative sample of AMD patients did not identify clinically significant sources or correlates of variability in ranibizumab exposure. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00056836, NCT00056823.) (Invest Ophthalmol Vis

Anti-factor D (AFD; FCFD4514S, lampalizumab) is a humanized IgG Fab fragment directed against factor D (fD), a rate-limiting serine protease in the alternative complement pathway (AP). Evaluation of AFD as a potential intravitreal (IVT) therapeutic for dry age-related macular degeneration patients with geographic atrophy (GA) is ongoing. However, it is unclear whether IVT administration of AFD can affect systemic AP activation and potentially compromise host-immune responses. We characterized the pharmacologic properties of AFD and assessed the effects of AFD administered IVT (2 or 20 mg) or intravenous (0.2, 2, or 20 mg) on systemic complement activity in cynomolgus monkeys. For the IVT groups, serum AP activity was reduced for the 20 mg dose group between 2 and 6 hours postinjection. For the intravenous groups, AFD inhibited systemic AP activity for periods of time ranging from 5 minutes (0.2 mg group) to 3 hours (20 mg group). Interestingly, the concentrations of total serum fD increased up to 10-fold relative to predose levels following administration of AFD. Furthermore, AFD was found to inhibit systemic AP activity only when the molar concentration of AFD exceeded that of fD. This occurred in cynomolgus monkeys at serum AFD levels $2 mg/ml, a concentration 8-fold greater than the maximum serum concentration observed following a single 10 mg IVT dose in a clinical investigation in patients with GA. Based on these findings, the low levels of serum AFD resulting from IVT administration of a clinically relevant dose are not expected to appreciably affect systemic AP activity.

Purpose: We characterized the pharmacokinetics of onartuzumab (MetMAb) in animals and determined a concentration-effect relationship in tumor-bearing mice to enable estimation of clinical pharmacokinetics and target doses.Experimental Design: A tumor growth inhibition model was used to estimate tumoristatic concentrations (TSC) in mice. Human pharmacokinetic parameters were projected from pharmacokinetics in cynomolgus monkeys by the species-invariant time method. Monte Carlo simulations predicted the percentage of patients achieving steady-state trough serum concentrations (C trough ss ) !TSC for every 3-week (Q3W) dosing.Results: Onartuzumab clearance (CL) in the linear dose range was 21.1 and 12.2 mL/d/kg in mice and cynomolgus monkeys with elimination half-life at 6.10 and 3.37 days, respectively. The estimated TSC in KP4 pancreatic xenograft tumor-bearing mice was 15 mg/mL. Projected CL for humans in the linear dose range was 5.74 to 9.36 mL/d/kg with scaling exponents of CL at 0.75 to 0.9. Monte Carlo simulations projected a Q3W dose of 10 to 30 mg/kg to achieve C trough ss of 15 mg/mL in 95% or more of patients.Conclusions: Onartuzumab pharmacokinetics differed from typical bivalent glycosylated monoclonal antibodies with approximately 2-times faster CL in the linear dose range. Despite this higher CL, xenograft efficacy data supported dose flexibility with Q1W to Q3W dose regimens in the clinical setting with a TSC of 15 mg/mL as the C trough ss target. The projected human efficacious dose of 10 to 30 mg/kg Q3W should achieve the target TSC of 15 mg/mL. These data show effective pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling to project doses to be tested in the clinic.

Onartuzumab is a unique, humanized, monovalent (one-armed) monoclonal antibody (mAb) against the MET receptor. The intravenous (IV) pharmacokinetics (PK) of onartuzumab were investigated in a phase I study and a phase II study in recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The potential for drug-drug interaction (DDI) was assessed during co-administration of IV onartuzumab with oral erlotinib, by measuring the PK of both drugs. The concentration-time profiles of onartuzumab were adequately described using a two-compartment model with linear clearance (CL) at doses between 4 and 30 mg/kg. The estimates for CL, central compartment volume (V1 ), and median terminal half-life were 0.439 L/day, 2.77 L, and 13.4 days, respectively. Statistically significant covariates included creatinine clearance (CrCL) on clearance, weight and gender on V1 , and weight on peripheral compartment volume (V2 ), but the clinical relevance of these covariates needs to be further evaluated. The current analysis did not indicate obvious DDI between onartuzumab and erlotinib. MET diagnostic status did not impact the exposure of either agent. Despite the slightly faster clearance compared with typical bivalent mAbs, the PK of onartuzumab support dosing regimens of 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks or doses equivalent to achieve the target minimum tumoristatic concentration in patients.