Importance Prostate cancer treatments are associated with side effects. Understanding the side effects of contemporary approaches to management of localized prostate could inform shared decision-making. Objective To compare the harms of radical prostatectomy (RP), radiation (EBRT) and active surveillance (AS). Design The Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Surgery and Radiation (CEASAR) study is a prospective, population-based, cohort study of men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer in 2011–2012. This study reports follow up through August 2015. Setting Patients accrued from five Surveillance Epidemiology, and End Results registry sites and the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor. Participants Men < 80 years old with clinical stage cT1-2 disease, prostate specific antigen < 50 ng/mL, enrolled within six months of diagnosis, who completed a baseline survey and at least 1 follow-up survey. Exposure Treatment with RP, EBRT or AS was ascertained within one year of diagnosis. Main Outcome and Measures Patient-reported function in sexual, urinary incontinence, urinary irritative, bowel, and hormonal domains on the 26-item Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) 36 months after enrollment. Domain scores range from 0–100. Higher score indicates better function. Minimum clinically important difference defined as 10–12, 6, 5, 5, and 4, respectively. Results The cohort included 2550 men (mean age 63.8 years, 74% white, 55% intermediate or high risk), of whom 1523 (59.7%) underwent RP, 598 (23.5%) EBRT, and 429 (16.8%) AS. Men undergoing EBRT were older (mean age 68.1 vs. 61.5, p<0.001), and had worse baseline sexual function (mean EPIC domain score 52.3 vs. 65.2, p<0.001) than men undergoing RP. At 3 years, adjusted mean sexual domain score for men undergoing RP had declined more than for men undergoing EBRT (mean difference −11.9 points, 95% CI [−15.1, −8.7]). The difference in decline in sexual domain scores between EBRT and AS was not clinically significant (−4.3 points, 95% CI [−9.2, 0.7]). RP was associated with worse urinary incontinence than EBRT (−18.0 points, 95% CI [−20.5, −15.4]) or AS (−12.7 points, 95% CI [−16.0, −9.3]) and better urinary irritative symptoms compared to AS (5.2 points, 95% CI [3.2, 7.2]). No clinically significant differences for bowel or hormone function were noted beyond 12 months. No differences in global quality of life or disease-specific survival (3 deaths) were noted (99.7–100%). Conclusion and Relevance In this cohort of men with localized prostate cancer, RP was associated with a larger decline in sexual function and urinary incontinence than EBRT or AS after 3 years, and lesser urinary irritative symptoms compared to AS; however, there were no meaningful differences in bowel or hormonal function beyond 12 months and no meaningful differences in global quality of life measures. These findings may facilitate counseling regarding the comparative harms of contemporary treatments for prostate cancer.

No abstract

IMPORTANCE Understanding adverse effects of contemporary treatment approaches for men with favorable-risk and unfavorable-risk localized prostate cancer could inform treatment selection. OBJECTIVE To compare functional outcomes associated with prostate cancer treatments over 5 years after treatment. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Prospective, population-based cohort study of 1386 men with favorable-risk (clinical stage cT1 to cT2bN0M0, prostate-specific antigen [PSA] Յ20 ng/mL, and Grade Group 1-2) prostate cancer and 619 men with unfavorable-risk (clinical stage cT2cN0M0, PSA of 20-50 ng/mL, or Grade Group 3-5) prostate cancer diagnosed in 2011 through 2012, accrued from 5 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program sites and a US prostate cancer registry, with surveys through September 2017. EXPOSURES Treatment with active surveillance (n = 363), nerve-sparing prostatectomy (n = 675), external beam radiation therapy (EBRT; n = 261), or low-dose-rate brachytherapy (n = 87) for men with favorable-risk disease and treatment with prostatectomy (n = 402) or EBRT with androgen deprivation therapy (n = 217) for men with unfavorable-risk disease. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Patient-reported function, based on the 26-item Expanded Prostate Index Composite (range, 0-100), 5 years after treatment. Regression models were adjusted for baseline function and patient and tumor characteristics. Minimum clinically important difference was 10 to 12 for sexual function, 6 to 9 for urinary incontinence, 5 to 7 for urinary irritative symptoms, and 4 to 6 for bowel and hormonal function. RESULTS A total of 2005 men met inclusion criteria and completed the baseline and at least 1 postbaseline survey (median [interquartile range] age, 64 [59-70] years; 1529 of 1993 participants [77%] were non-Hispanic white). For men with favorable-risk prostate cancer, nerve-sparing prostatectomy was associated with worse urinary incontinence at 5 years

Purpose To evaluate the validity of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function measures in a diverse, population-based cancer sample. Methods Cancer patients 6–13 months post diagnosis (n=4,840) were recruited for the Measuring Your Health (MY-Health) study. Participants were diagnosed between 2010–2013 with non-Hodgkin lymphoma or cancers of the colorectum, lung, breast, uterus, cervix, or prostate. Four PROMIS Physical Function short forms (4a, 6b, 10a, and 16) were evaluated for validity and reliability across age and race-ethnicity groups. Covariates included gender, marital status, education level, cancer site and stage, comorbidities, and functional status. Results PROMIS Physical Function short forms showed high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α =0.92 – 0.96), convergent validity (Fatigue, Pain Interference, FACT Physical Well-Being all r≥0.68) and discriminant validity (unrelated domains all r≤0.3) across survey short forms, age, and race-ethnicity. Known group differences by demographic, clinical, and functional characteristics performed as hypothesized. Ceiling effects for higher-functioning individuals were identified on most forms. Conclusions This study provides strong evidence that PROMIS Physical Function measures are valid and reliable in multiple race-ethnicity and age groups. Researchers selecting specific PROMIS short forms should consider the degree of functional disability in their patient population to ensure that length and content are tailored to limit response burden.

Background:Observational studies have reported a modest association between obesity and risk of ovarian cancer; however, whether it is also associated with survival and whether this association varies for the different histologic subtypes are not clear. We undertook an international collaborative analysis to assess the association between body mass index (BMI), assessed shortly before diagnosis, progression-free survival (PFS), ovarian cancer-specific survival and overall survival (OS) among women with invasive ovarian cancer.Methods:We used original data from 21 studies, which included 12 390 women with ovarian carcinoma. We combined study-specific adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) using random-effects models to estimate pooled HRs (pHR). We further explored associations by histologic subtype.Results:Overall, 6715 (54%) deaths occurred during follow-up. A significant OS disadvantage was observed for women who were obese (BMI: 30–34.9, pHR: 1.10 (95% confidence intervals (CIs): 0.99–1.23); BMI: ⩾35, pHR: 1.12 (95% CI: 1.01–1.25)). Results were similar for PFS and ovarian cancer-specific survival. In analyses stratified by histologic subtype, associations were strongest for women with low-grade serous (pHR: 1.12 per 5 kg m−2) and endometrioid subtypes (pHR: 1.08 per 5 kg m−2), and more modest for the high-grade serous (pHR: 1.04 per 5 kg m−2) subtype, but only the association with high-grade serous cancers was significant.Conclusions:Higher BMI is associated with adverse survival among the majority of women with ovarian cancer.