No abstract

There is growing interest in communicating clinically relevant DNA sequence findings to research participants who join projects with a primary research goal other than the clinical return of such results. Since Geisinger's MyCode Community Health Initiative (MyCode) was launched in 2007, more than 200,000 participants have been broadly consented for discovery research. In 2013 the MyCode consent was amended to include a secondary analysis of research genomic sequences that allows for delivery of clinical results. Since May 2015, pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants from a set list of genes associated with monogenic conditions have prompted "genome-first" clinical encounters. The encounters are described as genome-first because they are identified independent of any clinical parameters. This article (1) details our process for generating clinical results from research data, delivering results to participants and providers, facilitating condition-specific clinical evaluations, and promoting cascade testing of relatives, and (2) summarizes early results and participant uptake. We report on 542 participants who had results uploaded to the electronic health record as of February 1, 2018 and 291 unique clinical providers notified with one or more participant results. Of these 542 participants, 515 (95.0%) were reached to disclose their results and 27 (5.0%) were lost to follow-up. We describe an exportable model for delivery of clinical care through secondary use of research data. In addition, subject and provider participation data from the initial phase of these efforts can inform other institutions planning similar programs.

Purpose:To develop and validate VisCap, a software program targeted to clinical laboratories for inference and visualization of germ-line copy-number variants (CNVs) from targeted next-generation sequencing data.Genet Med 18 7, 712–719.Methods:VisCap calculates the fraction of overall sequence coverage assigned to genomic intervals and computes log2 ratios of these values to the median of reference samples profiled using the same test configuration. Candidate CNVs are called when log2 ratios exceed user-defined thresholds.Genet Med 18 7, 712–719.Results:We optimized VisCap using 14 cases with known CNVs, followed by prospective analysis of 1,104 cases referred for diagnostic DNA sequencing. To verify calls in the prospective cohort, we used droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to confirm 10/27 candidate CNVs and 72/72 copy-neutral genomic regions scored by VisCap. We also used a genome-wide bead array to confirm the absence of CNV calls across panels applied to 10 cases. To improve specificity, we instituted a visual scoring system that enabled experienced reviewers to differentiate true-positive from false-positive calls with minimal impact on laboratory workflow.Genet Med 18 7, 712–719.Conclusions:VisCap is a sensitive method for inferring CNVs from targeted sequence data from targeted gene panels. Visual scoring of data underlying CNV calls is a critical step to reduce false-positive calls for follow-up testing.Genet Med 18 7, 712–719.

The eMERGE Consortium* , * The advancement of precision medicine requires new methods to coordinate and deliver genetic data from heterogeneous sources to physicians and patients. The eMERGE III Network enrolled >25,000 participants from biobank and prospective cohorts of predominantly healthy individuals for clinical genetic testing to determine clinically actionable findings. The network developed protocols linking together the 11 participant collection sites and 2 clinical genetic testing laboratories. DNA capture panels targeting 109 genes were used for testing of DNA and sample collection, data generation, interpretation, reporting, delivery, and storage were each harmonized. A compliant and secure network enabled ongoing review and reconciliation of clinical interpretations, while maintaining communication and data sharing between clinicians and investigators. A total of 202 individuals had positive diagnostic findings relevant to the indication for testing and 1,294 had additional/secondary findings of medical significance deemed to be returnable, establishing data return rates for other testing endeavors. This study accomplished integration of structured genomic results into multiple electronic health record (EHR) systems, setting the stage for clinical decision support to enable genomic medicine. Further, the established processes enable different sequencing sites to harmonize technical and interpretive aspects of sequencing tests, a critical achievement toward global standardization of genomic testing. The eMERGE protocols and tools are available for widespread dissemination.

BackgroundResearch cohorts with linked genomic data exist, or are being developed, at many research centers. Within any such “sequenced cohort” of more than 100 participants, it is likely that there are participants with previously undisclosed risk for life-threatening monogenic diseases that could be identified with targeted analysis of their existing data. Identification of such disease-associated findings are not usually primary to the enrollment research goals. At Geisinger Health System, MyCode® Community Health Initiative (MyCode) participants represent one such large sequenced cohort. Since 2013, MyCode participants in discovery research have been consented for secondary analysis of their existing research genomic sequences to allow delivery of medically actionable findings to them and their healthcare providers. This return of genomic results program was developed to manage an anticipated 3.5% of MyCode participants who will receive clinically confirmed genomic variants from an approved gene list out of more than 150,000 total participants. Risk-associated DNA sequences alone without any clinical parameter, prompt “genome-first” follow-up encounters.MethodsThis article describes our process for generating clinical grade results from research-based genomic sequencing data, delivering results to patients and their providers, facilitating targeted clinical evaluations of patients and promoting cascade testing of at-risk relatives. We also summarize our early data about the results generated during this process and our ability to contact patients and their providers to disclose the information.ResultsThis process has been used to generate 343 results on 339 patients. 93% of patients with a result have been successfully contacted about their results as evidenced by direct interaction about their result with the research team or a healthcare provider. 222 healthcare providers have been notified of a result on one or more patient through this result delivery process.ConclusionsHere we describe the existing GHS model to deliver genomic data into the electronic medical record and the clinical interactions that are prompted and supported. Elements of this genome-first care model can be applied in other healthcare settings and in national efforts, such as “All of Us”, that wish to establish programs for returning genomic results to research participants.