As with most cancers, the aetiology of human cutaneous melanoma is likely to be multifactorial and to include the accumulation of irreversible alterations in an unknown number of genes. Elucidating this molecular progression necessitates both the identification of genetic perturbations at each clinically relevant stage, and the assessment of their impact on the normal melanocyte. The observation that the epidermal melanocyte, in contrast to metastatic melanoma cells, requires activation of the protein kinase C (PKC) pathway to facilitate growth in vitro indicates that one or more isoforms (or substrates) of this large and complex family of proteins are among those that undergo alteration during the development of malignant melanoma. Consequently, a number of studies have investigated the expression of various PKC family members in both melanocyte and melanoma cell lines, without a consensus of opinion as to which isoforms are of biological significance in melanoma development and progression. The present study involved a comprehensive evaluation of the PKC profile in normal melanocytes and in 16 metastatic melanoma cell lines. The results show that the major difference in isoform expression between epidermal melanocytes and melanoma cells is the loss of PKCbeta protein expression in 90% of melanoma cell lines. Examination of PKCbeta in benign and malignant melanocytic lesions revealed that this protein is either downregulated or absent in both naevi and metastatic melanomas. We conjecture that, although the loss of PKCbeta expression is a common phenomenon in malignant melanocytes, it may be related more to a normal process of melanocytic differentiation than to malignant transformation.

BackgroundThe Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act gave the Food and Drug Administration jurisdiction over the regulation of all tobacco products, including their nicotine content. Under this act, a major strategy to reduce harm from cigarette tobacco is lowering the nicotine content without causing unintended adverse consequences. Initial research on reduced nicotine content (RNC) cigarettes has shown that smokers of these cigarettes gradually decrease their smoking frequency and biomarkers of exposure. The effectiveness of this strategy needs to be demonstrated in different populations whose response to RNC cigarettes might be substantially mediated by personal or environmental factors, such as low socioeconomic status (SES) populations. This study aims to evaluate the response to a reduced nicotine intervention in low SES smokers, as defined here as those with less than 16 years of education, by switching smokers from high nicotine commercial cigarettes to RNC cigarettes.Methods/designAdults (N = 280) who have smoked five cigarettes or more per day for the past year, have not made a quit attempt in the prior month, are not planning to quit, and have less than 16 years of education are recruited into a two-arm, double-blinded randomized controlled trial. First, participants smoke their usual brand of cigarettes for 1 week and SPECTRUM research cigarettes containing a usual amount of nicotine for 2 weeks. During the experimental phase, participants are randomized to continue smoking SPECTRUM research cigarettes that contain either (1) usual nicotine content (UNC) (11.6 mg/cigarette) or (2) RNC (11.6 to 0.2 mg/cigarette) over 18 weeks. During the final phase of the study, all participants are offered the choice to quit smoking with nicotine replacement therapy, continue smoking the research cigarettes, or return to their usual brand of cigarettes. The primary outcomes of the study include retention rates and compliance with using only research cigarettes and no use of other nicotine-containing products. Secondary outcomes are tobacco smoke biomarkers, nicotine dependence measures, smoking topography, stress levels, and adverse health consequences.DiscussionResults from this study will provide information on whether low SES smokers can maintain a course of progressive nicotine reduction without increases in incidence of adverse effects.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01928719. Registered on 21 August 2013.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-017-2038-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.