Summary Donation after circulatory death (DCD) has become an accepted practice in many countries and remains a focus of intense interest in the transplant community. The present study is aimed at providing a description of the current situation of DCD in European countries. Specific questionnaires were developed to compile information on DCD practices, activities and post‐transplant outcomes. Thirty‐five countries completed the survey. DCD is practiced in 18 countries: eight have both controlled DCD (cDCD) and uncontrolled DCD (uDCD) programs, 4 only cDCD and 6 only uDCD. All these countries have legally binding and/or nonbinding texts to regulate the practice of DCD. The no‐touch period ranges from 5 to 30 min. There are variations in ante and post mortem interventions used for the practice of cDCD. During 2008–2016, the highest DCD activity was described in the United Kingdom, Spain, Russia, the Netherlands, Belgium and France. Data on post‐transplant outcomes of patients who receive DCD donor kidneys show better results with grafts obtained from cDCD versus uDCD donors. In conclusion, DCD is becoming increasingly accepted and performed in Europe, importantly contributing to the number of organs available and providing acceptable post‐transplantation outcomes.

IntroductionDiabetic foot infections are frequently polymicrobial. The lower tissue concentration of systemically administered antibiotics in diabetic patients was reported. Collatamp®EG (Syntacoll GmbH Saal/Donau, Germany) is a bioabsorbable, gentamicin impregnated collagen spongeused for local treatment. The aim of this randomized trial was to assess influence of gentamicin-collagen sponge applied to a wound on surgical outcomes after minor amputations in diabetic patients.Material and methodsFifty diabetic patients indicated for minor amputation in 2009 at our surgery department were included in the study. Patients were pre-operatively randomised into two groups. Twenty-five patients in group A were treated with gentamicin impregnated collagen sponge applied into wound peri-operatively while 25 patients in group B had minor amputation without gentamicin sponge.ResultsThere was no significant difference in the demographic data, procedures performed, diabetes duration and peripheral vascular disease severity between the groups. The median glycosylated haemoglobin was 6.0% (range: 4.6–9.5%) in group A and 6.2% (range: 4.0–8.4%) in control group B (non-significant). Median TcPO2 level was 44 (range: 13–67) in group A and 48 (range: 11–69) in control group B (non-significant). The median of wound healing duration in group A was 3.0 weeks (range: 1.7–17.1 weeks) compared to 4.9 weeks (range: 2.6–20.0 weeks) in control group B. This was with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05).ConclusionsApplication of gentamicin impregnated collagen sponge shortened wound healing duration after minor amputations in diabetic patients by almost 2 weeks.

In pancreas recipients with advanced diabetic eye disease, conflicting ophthalmologic results over different follow-up periods have been reported. In the present prospective study we performed ophthalmologic evaluation groups of type I diabetic patients: 1) normoglycemic recipients of pancreas and kidney grafts (group SPK, n = 43, follow-up 44.9 +/- 35.1 months), 2) pancreas and kidney graft recipients with nonfunctioning pancreatic graft, and recipients of isolated kidney graft (group K, n = 45, follow-up 60.3 +/- 34.2 months). The examinations were performed before transplantation, at the end of follow-up (at least 1 year), and in 63 recipients also at 3 years posttransplant. Visual acuity results at baseline and at the end of follow-up were 0.48 +/- 0.39 vs. 0.50 +/- 0.39 in the SPK group, and 0.46 +/- 0.38 vs. 0.40 +/- 0.39 in the K group. While intragroup changes were not significant, the changes were significantly different between the groups (p < 0.05). Fundoscopic findings at the end of follow-up were improved, stabilized, or deteriorated in the SPK group in 21.3%, 61.7%, and 17.0%, respectively. The respective figures for the K group were 6.1%, 48.8%, and 45.1% (p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained when evaluating findings at 3 years posttransplant. Before transplantation, 78% of the SPK group and 81% of the K group had been treated by laser. The need for additional posttransplant laser therapy was significantly lower in the SPK (31%) than in the K group (58%; p < 0.001). In conclusion, pancreas transplant exerts a beneficial effect on the course of diabetic retinopathy even in its late stage.

No abstract

Patient and graft survival after kidney transplantation was similar in type 2 diabetic and matched non-diabetic subjects, with more amputations occurring in the diabetic group. Thus, at a single-centre level renal transplantation results almost equivalent to those in non-diabetic patients may be achieved in type 2 diabetes mellitus.