The purpose of the study was to compare electrical stimulation (ES) and cervical magnetic stimulation (CMS) of the phrenic nerves for the measurement of the diaphragm compound muscle action potential (CMAP) and phrenic nerve conduction time. A specially designed esophageal catheter with three pairs of electrodes was used, with control of electrode positioning in 10 normal subjects. Pair A and pair B were close to the diaphragm (pair A lower than pair B); pair C was positioned 10 cm above the diaphragm to detect the electromyogram from extradiaphragmatic muscles. Electromyograms were also recorded from upper and lower chest wall surface electrodes. The shape of the CMAP measured with CMS (CMS-CMAP) usually differed from that of the CMAP measured with ES (ES-CMAP). Moreover, the latency of the CMS-CMAP from pair B (5.3 +/- 0.4 ms) was significantly shorter than that from pair A (7.1 +/- 0.7 ms). The amplitude of the CMS-CMAP (1.00 +/- 0.15 mV) was much higher than that of ES-CMAP (0.26 +/- 0.15 mV) when recorded from pair C. Good-quality CMS-CMAPs could be recorded in some subjects from an electrode positioned very low in the esophagus. The differences between ES-CMAP and CMS-CMAP recorded either from esophageal or chest wall electrodes make CMS unreliable for the measurement of phrenic nerve conduction time.
To assess the actions of the rectus abdominis and external oblique muscles on the rib cage in humans, these two muscles were stimulated with surface electrodes in four normal supine subjects at functional residual capacity. Changes in anteroposterior and transverse rib cage diameters and changes in xiphipubic distance were measured with pairs of magnetometers. Stimulation of rectus abdominis produced a marked decrease in the xiphipubic distance and in the anteroposterior diameter, thus making the rib cage more elliptic. In contrast, stimulation of the external oblique caused a decrease in the transverse diameter, making the rib cage more cylindrical. When both muscles were stimulated simultaneously, the resultant rib cage distortion depended on the relative voltage at which each muscle was stimulated. Electromyogram recordings showed that there was no cross contamination or activity of the diaphragm during the muscle stimulations. Transdiaphragmatic pressure increased with the voltage of stimulation, suggesting passive lengthening of the diaphragm. X-ray studies were performed in two subjects and confirmed the main magnetometer findings. These studies thus confirm that the rib cage in humans is more easily distortable than conventionally thought. The abdominal muscles can distort it in either direction depending on which muscles are contracting.
Normal cough requires abdominal muscle contraction. We have previously reported contraction of the abdominal muscles elicited by a single percutaneous magnetic stimulation of the thoracic nerve roots. We hypothesized that paired magnetic twitches could generate sufficient tension in the abdominal muscles to simulate cough. Therefore, six normal subjects were stimulated at the T10 intervertebral level in the seated position. We measured the gastric pressure elicited by paired magnetic stimuli (pTw Pga) with interstimulus intervals in the range of 10 ms (100 Hz) to 999 ms (1 Hz). In the second part of the study we evaluated paired stimuli (at the frequency found to produce the greatest response) using a valve to simulate the function of the glottis; the valve was arranged such that it opened once mouth pressure exceeded a predetermined threshold. Mean pTw Pga during stimulation for the 6 subjects was 74 cm H2O (range, 30-109), and mean peak flow was 209 L/min (range, 128-345 L/min). These values were increased if the subject took a prior inspiration or had previously made a vigorous expiratory effort. Comparable values for a maximal natural cough were 212 cm H2O and 649 L/min. We conclude that paired magnetic thoracic nerve root stimulation produces gastric pressure and expiratory flow of an order of magnitude comparable to a natural cough.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.