No abstract

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are beneficial for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs), and other tumors. The antitumor activity of sunitinib has been based on time-related parameters such as progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Advances in knowledge of the molecular mechanisms and oncogenic processes associated with RCC have enabled the availability of rational targets for pharmacotherapy. Although each small molecule is modeled to block the activity of selected kinase signaling enzymes, it is increasingly evident that many have nontargeted effects (on other kinases) that may cause unexpected complications. The recommended dose for sunitinib in patients with advanced RCC is a 50 mg oral daily dose, with or without food, on a 4/2 week schedule (4 weeks "on" vs. 2 weeks "off") until progression. An alternative continuous 37.5 mg/day dosing schedule has also been evaluated and appears to be well tolerated, allowing the maintenance of the dose density of sunitinib with a similar outcome. The continuous administration schedule provides a constant exposure to the drug, and may prevent potential tumor regrowth and angiogenesis recovery. Most side effects are reversible and should not result in sunitinib discontinuation. In this article, the body of evidence behind the use of sunitinib in metastatic RCC (mRCC) compared to other targeted agents that have recently come into the field is summarized, and the need for correct management of an adverse event profile in order to better optimize available treatment options is underlined.

No abstract

Thymic epithelial tumours (TET) represent a heterogeneous group of rare malignancies that include thymomas and thymic carcinoma. Treatment of TET is based on the resectability of the tumour. If this is considered achievable upfront, surgical resection is the cornerstone of treatment. Platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard regimen for advanced TET. Due to the rarity of this disease, treatment decisions should be discussed in specific multidisciplinary tumour boards, and there are few prospective clinical studies with new strategies. However, several pathways involved in TET have been explored as potential targets for new therapies in previously treated patients, such as multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors with antiangiogenic properties and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). One third of patient with thymoma present an autoimmune disorders, increasing the risk of immune-related adverse events and autoimmune flares under ICIs. In these guidelines, we summarize the current evidence for the therapeutic approach in patients with TET and define levels of evidence for these decisions.

We performed a literature search that shed light on the signaling pathways involved in the sorafenib activity as first- or subsequent-line treatment, taking into account its toxicity profile. Sorafenib appears to have better tolerability when compared with other agents in the same indication. Cross-resistance between tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) may be limited, even after failure with a previous VEGFR inhibitor, but the optimal sequence with TKIs remains to be determined. Randomized trials of second-line treatment options have showed either modest or no differences in terms of progression-free and overall survival (OS). Direct comparison between sorafenib and axitinib demonstrated differences in terms of PFS in favor of axitinib, but not in terms of OS as second-line treatment. In contrast, a phase III study showed a benefit in OS, favoring sorafenib when compared with temsirolimus. In conclusion, after using other VEGF inhibitor such as sunitinib, sorafenib is active and safe for the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic RCC.