Summary:Steroid-resistant acute GVHD (aGVHD) following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) continues to be associated with a high mortality. We report the results of a phase II study of treatment of steroid-resistant aGVHD with the IL-2 receptor antibody daclizumab combined with the TNFreceptor fusion protein etanercept. Treatment consisted of daclizumab 1 mg/kg given i.v. on days 1, 4, 8, 15, 22 and etanercept 16 mg/m 2 s.c. on days 1, 5, 9, 13, 17. A total of 21 patients (age 15-61 years) with steroid-resistant aGVHD after alloHSCT were included in the study. Donor types were HLA-matched related (n ¼ 6), HLAmatched unrelated (n ¼ 14), and HLA-mismatched unrelated (n ¼ 1). Eight patients achieved complete, and six showed partial remission of aGVHD. Seven patients did not respond. Four of 21 patients are currently alive with a median follow-up of 586 (185-1155) days. Three patients died due to relapsed malignancy. Treatment-related mortality was due to infectious complications (n ¼ 11) or organ failure due to aGVHD (n ¼ 3). In total, 12 patients developed subsequent chronic GVHD. In conclusion, the data demonstrate an acceptable response rate of the combination of daclizumab and etanercept in the treatment of steroid-resistant aGVHD. Nevertheless, longterm mortality due to infectious complications and chronic GVHD remains high.

MegaCHOEP for T-NHL patients was no better than other high-dose regimens and was unable to address the major problems of HDT/ASCT: neither early progressions nor early relapses were reduced. This study sheds some doubt on expectations that HDT/ASCT will significantly improve outcomes for patients with T-NHL.

No abstract

The results demonstrate that loss of PF occurs during the first month followed by a regain during the subsequent 2 months in the absence of aGVHD. The HAP and the grip test may serve as surrogate marker for the strength loss in the course of aGVHD.

Background: Anxiety and depressive symptoms are commonly reported to have a high prevalence in advanced cancer patients. However, whether the severity of the symptoms change during a stay in a palliative care unit (PCU) and after discharge home has not been studied thus far. This prospective, longitudinal, single-center study screened for anxiety and depression as measured on the German version of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) in a palliative care (PC) cancer cohort at three different time points.Methods: Consecutive patients (N=206) admitted to a PCU were evaluated of whom N=102 could be enrolled. Patients were screened for anxiety and depression using the HADS-D questionnaire: 24 h after admittance (P1), within 24 h before discharge (P2) and 2 weeks after discharge (P3). Longitudinal changes and influencing factors were determined.Results: Nearly 80% of all patients had at least at one time point a HADS score ≥8 indicating a clinically meaningful symptom burden. The P1 mean scores were 7.1±3.3 (anxiety) and 8.9±4.6 (depression).Depression was associated with underlying cancer type (P<0.05). Anxiety and depression stabilized during hospitalization (P2). However, a significant deterioration after discharge (P3) was observed (anxiety P=0.046; depression P=0.003), in particular in older patients (>65 years) and higher ECOG status (≥3). Patients with a short time since first diagnosis (<1 year) had significantly higher symptom burden compared to patients with a longer disease course. Participation was 50% emphasizing the difficulty to study PC patients. Most patients had advanced cancers (99%). Underlying cancer types consisted of a broad variety of solid tumors including 15% hematological cases. Median survival was 1.1 months. Conclusions:The high prevalence of anxiety and depressive symptoms points to the need for psychological support. All PC patients should be screened for psychological distress to identify those in need of further assessment and treatment. The deterioration at home suggests the need for improved outpatient management, including home-based psychological support. Caregivers should be aware of the psychological vulnerability of newly diagnosed cancer patients, patients with lower functional status and higher age.