BackgroundIncidence of Blunt Cerebrovascular Injuries (BCVI) after head injury has been reported as 0.5-1% of all admissions for blunt trauma, with a high stroke and mortality rate. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if a modification of Memphis criteria could improve the rate of BCVI diagnosis.MethodsTrauma patients consecutively admitted to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) from Jan 2008 to Oct 2009 were considered for the study. Memphis criteria comprehend: basilar skull fracture with involvement of the carotid canal, cervical spine fracture, neurological exam not explained by brain imaging, Horner's syndrome, LeFort II-III fractures, and neck soft tissue injury. As single criteria modification, we included all patients with petrous bone fracture, even without carotid canal involvement. In all patients at risk of BCVI, 64-slice angio-CT-scans was performed.ResultsDuring the study period, 266 patients were admitted to the ICU for blunt major trauma. Among them, 162 presented traumatic brain injury or cervical spine fracture. In accordance with the proposed modified-Memphis criteria, 53 patients showed risk factors for BCVI compared to 45 using the original Memphis criteria. Among the 53 patients, 6 resulted as having carotid lesions (2.2% of all blunt major traumas; one patient more than when using Memphis criteria). Anticoagulant therapy with low molecular weight heparin was administered in all patients. No stroke or hemorrhagic complications occurred. Clinical examination at 6-months showed no central neurological deficit.ConclusionA modification of a single criteria of Memphis screening protocol might permit the identification of a higher percentage of BCVI. Limited by sample size, this study needs to be validated.
Objectives: To investigate clinical and demographic characteristics of patients with intracranial arterial dolichoectasia (IADE) and describe the possible coexistence of cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) and systemic arteriopathy. Material and methods: From January 2015 to March 2016, all the patients attending an outpatient service for chronic cerebrovascular diseases were screened for suspected IADE. Identified patients underwent a predefined protocol including: brain MR angiography for the diagnosis of IADE; brain MRI with visual rating of SVD features; whole-body CT angiography to assess signs of systemic arteriopathy; and neuropsychological examination.Results: Among the 251 patients screened, IADE was diagnosed in seven (mean age ± SD 68.8 ± 7.2 years, six males). Hypertension was the most frequent risk factor. All patients had basilar artery dolichoectasia, two also ectasia of a vessel of the anterior circulation. All patients had white matter hyperintensities that were moderate or severe in six, five had at least one lacune, and all had enlarged perivascular spaces. At least one microbleed was detected in six patients. A variable grade of global cortical atrophy was found in six patients. Systemic arterial ectasia was found in all but one patient. Neuropsychological examination showed a multidomain cognitive impairment in five patients.
Conclusions:Our study confirms the high prevalence of cerebral SVD in IADE. The involvement of the brain-supplying arteries is probably part of a systemic arteriopathy in IADE patients, thus suggesting the usefulness of assessing the whole arterial tree in clinical practice. Cognitive deterioration signs are frequent in these patients.
K E Y W O R D Sarteriopathy, cognitive function, computed tomography angiography, dolichoectasia, magnetic resonance imaging, small vessel disease
The possibility to progress to overt aortic dissection may explain the need to an early diagnosis in the treatment of acute IMHs. Immediate surgical treatment is, in our experience, the preferred therapeutic option.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.