SummaryFactor VIII or factor IX replacement is frequently impossible in inhibitor-developing hemophiliacs, because of the level of the inhibitor titer. Activated prothrombin complex concentrates are one of the available options to treat the bleeding episodes in such patients. However, the efficacy of these products and the associated thrombogenic risk, particularly in prolonged administration such as employed during surgeries, are important concerns for hemophilia care providers. We performed a multicenter retrospective study to evaluate the use of FEIBA (Factor Eight Bypassing Activity) in France, and data is presented on 433 bleeding episodes, including surgical procedures, concerning 60 patients from 15 hemophilia centers.The efficacy was judged as good or excellent in 352 episodes (81.3%), poor in 73 episodes (16.9%) and non-existent in 8 episodes (1.8%). Minor and major surgical procedures were successfully performed using FEIBA as a second-line therapy after human or porcine factor VIII, and in some occasions FEIBA was utilized as the only substitution product. The tolerance was assessed as good in 428 episodes (98.8%), but in 5 cases adverse effects were reported. Only 3 patients out of 52 regularly evaluated (5.8%) were HIV-seropositive, and for two of them the seroconversion occurred prior to the first use of FEIBA. In contrast, 80.4% of the patients were HCV-seropositive. An anamnestic response after the administration of FEIBA was noted in 31.5% of cases. This study points out the main features of the use of FEIBA in France, and particularly the low HIV seroprevalence in the patients treated. The good efficacy and the excellent tolerance still confer to this product a place to consider in the therapeutic options for the treatment of inhibitor-developing hemophiliacs or in acquired hemophilia.

It suggests a higher consumption and cost of anti-haemophilic drugs among children when compared to adults. Haemophilia B patients did not consume significantly more than haemophilia A patients, whereas the consumption and cost for patients with or without inhibitors differed significantly.

Replacement therapy in haemophiliacs has a major economic impact on health establishments. We assessed in this prospective study the cost of clotting factor concentrate therapy for haemophilia A or B patients. We compared the overall costs of treated patients with or without inhibitors. In six French haemophilia centres, 278 consecutive hospitalizations were collected and analysed between June 97 and June 99. Haemophilia must be considered as the main cost factor during hospitalization. The severity of bleeds and surgical procedures increase the total cost. Furthermore, the daily and total costs are closely linked to the presence or the absence of inhibitors. This study should enable the hospital administration to evaluate the necessary resources to the clotting factor therapy in haemophiliacs with or without inhibitors during hospitalization.

The physical condition of severe haemophilia and the impact of advances in replacement therapy have been much studied, but little work has been done on patients who developed inhibitors. The 'Statut Orthopédique des Patients Hémophiles avec Inhibiteur' study was conducted in France in order to assess the orthopaedic status and quality of life of such patients, and the cost of their medical management. Fifty haemophiliacs aged 12-63 years with a history of high-responder inhibitors were included. Clinical assessment showed that only 12% of the patients had a nil pain score and 2% a nil clinical score, as per Gilbert scale. The mean clinical score was significantly higher in patients over 35 years of age than in younger ones. However, younger patients appeared to have a more impaired orthopaedic status than young haemophiliacs without inhibitors of similar age in previous published cohorts. Surprisingly, older haemophiliacs tended to have the best mental quality of life, contrasting with their highly impaired orthopaedic condition and physical quality of life. The mean cost of clinical resources consumed during the year preceding enrolment was Euro 268 999, 99% of which was related to clotting factor. Marked between-patient differences in cost were noted. Our study suggests that the management of haemophiliacs with inhibitors should be improved in order to prevent haemophilic arthropathy to an extent similar to that of patients without inhibitors. Cost-benefit assessment of any therapeutic strategy should always be combined with quality-of-life evaluation.

A recent multicentre collaborative study showed higher estimates of ReFacto potency when assayed with ReFacto Laboratory Standard(TM) (RLS) in comparison when standards consisting of full-length factor VIII (FVIII) were used. The RLS was hence recalibrated, leading to a 20% increase in the amount of ReFacto per vial without change in the labelled potency. The primary objective of this study was to determine the incremental and in vivo recovery of the recalibrated ReFacto in patients with severe haemophilia A. Fourteen male severe haemophilia A patients (FVIII < 1 IU dL(-1)) with a cumulative previous exposure days to any FVIII product >150 were administered an intravenous infusion 50 +/- 5 IU kg(-1) of ReFacto over a 5-min period. Blood samples were collected before infusion and after 15, 30 and 60 min. FVIII clotting activity (FVIII:C) was assessed in a central laboratory by the chromogenic substrate assay. After ReFacto infusion, peak FVIII:C was obtained within 15 min for 10 patients and within 30 min for the remaining four. Mean FVIII:C at peak was 117.7 +/- 17.3 IU dL(-1). Mean incremental recovery was 2.22 +/- 0.27 IU dL(-1) per IU kg(-1) while mean in vivo recovery was 105.9 +/- 14.6%. One patient reported three mild adverse events rated as 'unrelated' to the study drug. FVIII recovery after recalibrated ReFacto infusion falls within the expected range and is similar to the values reported for other FVIII concentrates.