In order to monitor the incidence and types of peripheral vascular complications in a single institution, we prospectively entered 1,579 coronary angioplasty cases into a computer data base during the years 1991 and 1992. Various periprocedural risk factors were analyzed. The patients were followed closely to identify complications that occurred outside the laboratory or after discharge from the hospital. Peripheral vascular complications occurred in 37 patients (2.37%) and included hematoma 20 (1.27%), retroperitoneal bleeding 7 (.44%), false aneurysm 6 (.38%), occlusion 1 (.06%), infection 2 (.13%), and cholesterol emboli 1 (.06%). Risk factors for complications by multivariate analysis were older age, female gender, and clinical evidence of peripheral vascular disease. Other factors potentially related to vascular trauma or bleeding tendency that were not risk factors in this series were clinical presentation, use of heparin or thrombolytic agents, blood clotting parameters, and arterial sheath size. There was no significant difference between the femoral and brachial approaches in frequency of complications (2.5% vs. 1.6%), but femoral complications tended to carry greater morbidity.

The safety and efficacy of transradial cardiac catheterization in elderly patients is unknown. This study examines procedure success rates for transradial catheterization in appropriately selected patients < 70 (n = 195) and >/= 70 (n = 83) years old. Elderly patients were less likely to be selected for the transradial approach (46% vs. 61%; P = 0.05). Although patients >/= 70 years old were more often female (39.7% vs. 24.1%; P = 0.008) and had a smaller body surface area (1.89 +/- 0.18 vs. 2.01 +/- 0.24 m2; P = 0. 001), procedure success rates did not differ (95.1% vs. 94.8%; P = NS). Procedure-related variables including procedure time (15.4 +/- 12.6 vs. 16.1 +/- 11.6 min; P = NS), amount of radiographic contrast (90.1 +/- 31.9 vs. 86.4 +/- 29.8 cc; P = NS), and number of catheters used (1.5 +/- 0.9 vs. 1.5 +/- 0.7; P = NS) were similar between groups. We conclude that transradial catheterization can be safely and effectively performed in selected elderly patients. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 51:287-290, 2000.

As time to reperfusion correlates with outcomes, a door-to-balloon time of 90 +/- 30 min for primary percutaneous coronary revascularization (PCI) for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction has been recently established as a guideline by the ACC/AHA. The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of a continuous quality assurance program designed to expedite primary angioplasty at a community hospital. A database of all primary PCI procedures was created in 1998. Two groups of consecutive patients treated with primary PCI were studied. Group 1 represented patients in the time period between 1 June 1998 to 1 November 1998 and group 2 represented patients in the period between 1 January 2000 and 16 June 2000. Continuous quality assurance analysis was performed. Modifications to the primary angioplasty program were initiated in the latter group. Time intervals to certain treatment landmarks were compared between the groups. Significant decreases in the time intervals from emergency room registration to initial electrocardiogram (8.4 +/- 8.2 vs. 3.7 +/- 19.5 min; P < 0.001), presentation to the catheterization laboratory to arterial access (13.5 +/- 12.9 vs. 11.6 +/- 5.8 min; P < 0.001), and emergency room registration to initial angioplasty balloon inflation (132.0 +/- 69.2 vs. 112 +/- 72.0 min; P < 0.001) were achieved. For the subgroup of patients presenting with diagnostic ST elevation myocardial infarction, a large decrease in the door-to-balloon time interval between group 1 and group 2 was demonstrated (114.15 +/- 9.67 vs. 87.92 +/- 10.93 min; P = NS), resulting in compliance with ACC/AHA guidelines. Continuous quality improvement analysis can expedite care for patients treated by primary PCI in the community hospital setting.

To determine the safety and efficacy of repeat transradial cardiac catheterization, 1,362 consecutive transradial procedures were examined. Repeat transradial procedures were identified (group I, n = 73) and compared with index procedures (group II, n = 1,289). Baseline patient characteristics, procedure success rates (100% vs. 97.9%; P = NS), complication rates (0% vs. 0.08%; P = NS), and procedure times (23.9 +/- 27.3 min vs. 18.2 +/- 14.7 min; P = NS) were similar between groups. This study suggests that repeat transradial catheterization procedures can be performed safely and successfully in appropriately selected patients.