The utility of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) utility in predicting immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and survival have not been well studied in the context of treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We performed a case-control study of cancer patients who received at least one dose of ICI in a tertiary hospital. We examined NLR and PLR in irAE cases and controls. Logistic and Cox regression models were used to identify independent risk factors for irAEs, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The study included 91 patients with irAEs and 56 controls. Multiple logistic regression showed that NLR < 3 at baseline was associated with higher occurrence of irAEs. Multivariate Cox regression showed that development of irAEs and reduction in NLR from baseline to week 6 were associated with longer PFS. Higher NLR values at baseline and/or week 6 were independently associated with shorter OS. A reduction in NLR from baseline to week 6 was associated with longer OS. In this study of cancer patients treated with ICIs, NLR has a bidirectional relationship with adverse outcomes. Lower NLR was associated with increased occurrence of irAEs while higher NLR values were associated with worse clinical outcomes.
Milk-derived extracellular vesicles (mEVs) have been proposed as a potential nanomedicine for intestinal disorders; however, their impact on intestinal barrier integrity in gut inflammation and associated metabolic diseases has not been explored yet. Here, mEVs derived from bovine and human breast milk exert similar protective effects on epithelial tight junction functionality in vitro, survive harsh gastrointestinal conditions ex vivo, and reach the colon in vivo. Oral administration of mEVs restores gut barrier integrity at multiple levels, including mucus, epithelial, and immune barriers, and prevents endotoxin translocation into the liver in chemical-induced experimental colitis and diet-induced nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), thereby alleviating gut disorders, their associated liver inflammation, and NASH. Oral administration of mEVs has potential in the treatment of gut inflammation and gut-liver axis–associated metabolic diseases via protection of intestinal barrier integrity.
Background and Aims The evaluation of the natural history of NASH has been limited. Currently, liver biopsy remains the gold standard in the assessment of NASH. Placebo‐controlled trials represent a controlled environment with paired biopsies for the evaluation of NASH. This meta‐analysis thus seeks to quantify the change severity of NASH over time, with patients on placebo arms from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to examine the natural history of NASH. Methods A search was conducted to include NASH RCTs with placebo treatment arms. Primary outcomes were (1) the resolution of NASH without worsening of fibrosis, (2) two‐point reduction in NAFLD activity score without worsening of fibrosis, and (3) at least one‐point reduction in fibrosis. Generalized linear mix model was used to estimate pooled proportion and mean differences. Results This meta‐analysis of 43 RCTs included 2649 placebo‐treated patients. The pooled estimate of NASH resolution and two‐point NAFLD activity score reduction without worsening of fibrosis was 11.65% (95% CI: 7.98‐16.71) and 21.11% (95% CI: 17.24‐25.57). The rate of ≥1 stage reduction and progression of fibrosis was 18.82% (95% CI: 15.65‐22.47) and 22.74% (CI: 19.63‐26.17), respectively. Older age and African American ethnicity was associated with lower NASH resolution rate in placebo‐treated patients. Conclusions Despite the absence of any pharmacological interventions, a significant proportion of patients in the placebo arm demonstrated improvements in liver histology, highlighting the possibility that NASH is a disease that can not only progress but regress spontaneously over time. Additionally, histologic response in placebo‐treated patients is helpful in future design of phase 2B and phase 3 trials.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.