Antibody (rituximab) dependent cellular cytotoxicity is a key mechanism in killing CD20+ lymphoma cells. FcγRIIIA-158 V/F gene polymorphism results in expression of 3 variants of the FcγRIIIA receptor (FcγRIIIA) on cytotoxic lymphocytes with different receptor affinity. We studied 102 patients with newly diagnosed FL to assess whether the FcγRIIIA genotype influences outcome in patients treated with risk-adapted immunochemotherapy. The median age was 52 years (31-84); 90% of the patients had advanced (III/IV) clinical stages. The Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) scores were as follows: low 18.9%, intermediate 33.7% and high 47.4%. The front-line treatment was stratified according to the commonly used risk factors (FLIPI, beta-2-microglobuline and serum-Tyrosine-Kinase levels, bulky disease) into 3 treatment groups: (1) patients with FLIPI 0-1 treated with (R)-CHOP (51%), (2) patients under 60 (65) years of age with intermediate-risk disease (FLIPI 2) indicated for an intensive protocol (ProMACE-CytaBOM or sequential chemotherapy) (21%), and (3) patients under 60 (65) years with high-risk disease (FLIPI ≥3) treated with intensive chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell transplantation (28%). Rituximab was added to front-line chemotherapy in 59% of the patients. Generally, complete remission (CR) or unconfirmed CR was achieved in 85% of the patients, 11% had partial remission and 4% stable disease. Molecular CR (CRm) was achieved in 67.4% of 86 evaluable patients. Overall survival (OS) at 5 years reached 84% (95% CI 0.74-0.93); event-free survival (EFS) at 5 years was 58% (95% CI 0.45-0.71). The frequencies of FcγRIIIA-158 gene polymorphisms V/V, V/F and F/F were 8%, 50% and 42%, respectively. The FLIPI score distribution was not different in F/F patients as compared to V/F+V/V carriers (chi-square, P=0.7). The treatment modalities (treatment arm or rituximab administration) had the same distribution in V/V+V/F vs F/F patients (chi-square, P=0.16 and P=0.62, respectively). The CRm rates were similar in both subgroups of V/V+V/F vs F/F patients (chi-square, P=0.92). Survival curves for OS and EFS were not significantly different when comparing the subgroups of V/V+V/F vs F/F patients (P=0.28 and P=0.57, respectively). We found no difference in the quality of treatment response or survival after front-line immunochemotherapy between FcγRIIIA subgroups. FcγRIIIA polymorphism have no influence on the outcome of patients treated with risk-adapted chemotherapy with or without rituximab.

Association of trough imatinib plasma levels (IPL) with cytogenetic or molecular response to treatment in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) was repeatedly reported. We analyzed their value in the routine clinical setting in 131 patients with chronic phase CML in whom imatinib was applied as first- or second-line treatment. A total of 1,118 measurements were obtained by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay in patients treated with daily dose of imatinib ranging from 100 to 800 mg. Samples were obtained from 1 to 96 h after drug ingestion. High inter (36%) and intraindividual variability (9-33%) of IPL was observed. For analysis of correlation of IPL with treatment response, two sets of samples were selected according to the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria. The first set consisted of 241 samples taken 24 ± 2 h after dosing in 54 patients, and the second one consisted of 329 samples taken 24 ± 4 h after imatinib ingestion in 84 patients. In both sets, only patients treated with 400 mg imatinib once daily for at least 18 months were included. From multiple measurements in individual patients, mean IPL were used. In both sets, we were not able to demonstrate a statistically significant correlation between IPL and response to treatment according to the ELN. We believe that this was due to the differences in patients' compliance, leukemia biology, and other variables that are difficult to eliminate in the routine clinical practice. The use of IPL for prognostic estimation in CML treatment outside the clinical trials is probably limited.

No abstract

No abstract