In recent years, rigid analogues of phenylalkylamine hallucinogens have appeared as recreational drugs. Examples include 2-(8-bromo-2,3,6,7-tetrahydrobenzo[1,2-b:4,5-b′]difuran-4-yl)ethan-1-amine (2C-B-FLY) and 1-(8-bromobenzo[1,2-b;4,5-b ’]difuran-4-yl)-2-aminopropane (Bromo-DragonFLY, DOB-DFLY). Although some rigid compounds such as DOB-DFLY reportedly have higher potency than their non-rigid counterparts, it is not clear whether the same is true for 2C-B-FLY and other tetrahydrobenzodifurans. In the present study, the head twitch response (HTR), a 5-HT2A receptor-mediated behavior induced by serotonergic hallucinogens, was used to assess the effects of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-bromoamphetamine (DOB) and its α-desmethyl homologue 2,5-dimethoxy-4-bromophenethylamine (2C-B), as well as their benzodifuranyl and tetrahydrobenzodifuranyl analogs, in C57BL/6J mice. DOB (ED50 = 0.75 μmol/kg) and 2C-B (ED50 = 2.43 μmol/kg) induced the HTR. The benzodifurans DOB-DFLY (ED50 = 0.20 μmol/kg) and 2C-B-DFLY (ED50 = 1.07 μmol/kg) had significantly higher potency than DOB and 2C-B, respectively. The tetrahydrobenzodifurans DOB-FLY (ED50 = 0.67 μmol/kg) and 2C-B-FLY (ED50 = 1.79 μmol/kg), by contrast, were approximately equipotent with their non-rigid counterparts. Three novel tetrahydrobenzodifurans (2C-I-FLY, 2C-E-FLY and 2C-EF-FLY) were also active in the HTR assay but had relatively low potency. In summary, the in vivo potency of 2,5-dimethoxyphenylalkylamines is enhanced when the 2- and 5-methoxy groups are incorporated into aromatic furan rings, whereas potency is not altered if the methoxy groups are incorporated into dihydrofuran rings. The potency relationships for these compounds in mice closely parallel the human hallucinogenic data. The high potency of DOB-DFLY is probably linked to the presence of two structural features (a benzodifuran nucleus and an α-methyl group) known to enhance the potency of phenylalkylamine hallucinogens.
Neointima formation involves tissue expression of matrix proteins and growth factors. The role of alphavbeta3, but not alphavbeta5 integrin in vascular cells has been sufficiently investigated. The aim of the present study was to determine and compare the function of alphavbeta3 and alphavbeta5 integrins in rat aortic (RASMC) and human coronary vascular smooth muscle cells (HCSMC) and to characterize their expression accompanying neointima formation in vivo. RASMC and HCSMC express alphavbeta3 and alphavbeta5 integrin subunits. The alphavbeta5 integrin predominantly mediated adhesion of RASMCs to vitronectin and spreading on vitronectin via RGD-binding sequences. In contrast, the alphavbeta3 integrin did not contribute to the adhesion and spreading on fibronectin, vitronectin, gelatin or collagen I coated layers. PDGF-directed migration through gelatin coated membranes involved both alphavbeta3 and alphavbeta5 integrins. Selective blocking antibodies for alphavbeta3 and alphavbeta5 inhibited migration of RASMC and HCSMC by more than 60 % (p < 0.01). Integrin expression was studied in vivo in thoracic aorta of Sprague Dawley rats before and after balloon injury. In situ hybridization demonstrated low signals for alphav, beta3 and beta5 mRNA in uninjured aorta, which increased significantly at 14 days, localized predominantly in the neointima. Northern analysis of aorta after 14 days of injury also demonstrated an upregulation of alphav, beta3 and beta5 mRNA compared to uninjured aorta. Consistent with the increase in message levels, increased integrin protein expression was seen in the neointima after 7 and 14 days. This study provides evidence that alphavbeta3 and alphavbeta5 are elevated during neointima formation in the rat and indicates a novel role for alphavbeta5 participating in mechanisms regulating smooth muscle cell migration.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.