A B S T R A C T PurposeFluourouracil (FU) is a mainstay of chemotherapy, although toxicities are common. Genetic biomarkers have been used to predict these adverse events, but their utility is uncertain. Patients and MethodsWe tested candidate polymorphisms identified from a systematic literature search for associations with capecitabine toxicity in 927 patients with colorectal cancer in the Quick and Simple and Reliable trial (QUASAR2). We then performed meta-analysis of QUASAR2 and 16 published studies (n ϭ 4,855 patients) to examine the polymorphisms in various FU monotherapy and combination therapy regimens. ResultsGlobal capecitabine toxicity (grades 0/1/2 v grades 3/4/5) was associated with the rare, functional DPYD alleles 2846TϾA and *2A (combined odds ratio, 5.51; P ϭ .0013) and with the common TYMS polymorphisms 5ЈVNTR2R/3R and 3ЈUTR 6bp ins-del (combined odds ratio, 1.31; P ϭ 9.4 ϫ 10 Ϫ6 ). There was weaker evidence that these polymorphisms predict toxicity from bolus and infusional FU monotherapy. No good evidence of association with toxicity was found for the remaining polymorphisms, including several currently included in predictive kits. No polymorphisms were associated with toxicity in combination regimens. ConclusionA panel of genetic biomarkers for capecitabine monotherapy toxicity would currently comprise only the four DPYD and TYMS variants above. We estimate this test could provide 26% sensitivity, 86% specificity, and 49% positive predictive value-better than most available commercial kits, but suboptimal for clinical use. The test panel might be extended to include additional, rare DPYD variants functionally equivalent to *2A and 2846A, though insufficient evidence supports its use in bolus, infusional, or combination FU. There remains a need to identify further markers of FU toxicity for all regimens.
To evaluate the single agent activity, pharmacokinetics and tolerability of the novel tubulin targeted agent vinflunine (VFL) (320 mg m À2 q 21 days) as second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC). All patients had disease progression after anthracycline/taxane (A/T) therapy. They could have received a nonanthracycline adjuvant treatment and subsequently received a first-line A/T combination for advanced/metastatic disease; or relapsed 46 months after completion of adjuvant A/T therapy and were subsequently treated with the alternative agent; or relapsed within 6 months from an adjuvant A/T combination. Objective response was documented in 18 of 60 patients enrolled (RR: 30% (95% confidence interval (CI): 18.9 -43.2%)). Among the responders, seven patients had relapsed during a period of o3 months from taxane-based regimen yielding a RR of 33.3%. The median duration of response was 4.8 months (95% CI: 4.2 -7.2), median progression-free survival was 3.7 months (95% CI: 2.8 -4.2) and median overall survival was 14.3 months (95% CI: 9.2 -19.6). The most frequent adverse event was neutropenia (grade 3 in 28.3% and grade 4 in 36.7% of patients). No febrile neutropenia was observed. Fatigue (grade 3 in 16.7% of patients) and constipation (grade 3 in 11.7% of patients) were also common; these were non-cumulative and manageable permitting achievement of a good relative dose intensity of 93.5%. Vinflunine is an active agent with acceptable tolerance in the management of MBC patients previously treated with (A/T)-based regimens. These encouraging phase II results warrant further investigation of this novel agent in combination with other active agents in this setting or in earlier stages of disease.
Introduction Patients with isolated local and regional recurrences (ILRR) of breast cancer (BC) have a high risk of developing distant metastasis and dying from BC. We investigated the impact of chemotherapy (C) on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after ILRR. Methods Patients with resected ILRR were stratified according to prior chemotherapy (yes vs. no), ER and/or PgR status of the recurrent tumor (both negative vs. either positive), and location of recurrence (breast vs. scar/chest wall vs. lymph nodes). Radiation, hormone and HER2 directed therapies were delineated in the protocol. Participants were randomly assigned to receive C or none. Multidrug C for at least 4 courses was recommended. Drug selection was at the discretion of the investigator. Slow accrual led to premature closure of the trial before achieving the planned sample size of 265. Results The trial accrued 162 patients (C, 85; control, 77) from 2002–2010. The groups were balanced in regard to the characteristics listed in the table below. At a median follow up of 4.9 years, there were 24 (28%) DFS events and 9 (11%) deaths in the C group compared with 34 (44%) DFS events and 21 (27%) deaths in the control group, corresponding to a 5-year DFS of 69% vs. 57%, [DFS HR (C/control) = 0.59, 95% CI (0.35, 0.99)], p =0.046] and a 5-year OS of 88% vs. 76%, [OS HR (C/control) = 0.41, 95% CI (0.19, 0.89)], p =0.02]. The results remained significant for both DFS and OS in multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling controlling for ILRR location, disease-free interval, ER status and prior adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant C was particularly effective for women with ER-negative ILRR: 5-year DFS 67% vs. 35%, [DFS HR (C/control) = 0.32, 95% CI (0.14, 0.73)], p =0.007] and OS 79% vs. 69%, [OS HR (C/control) = 0.43, 95% CI (0.15, 1.24)], p =0.12]. Results for the ER-positive ILRR cohort were: 5-year DFS 70% vs. 69%, [DFS HR (C/control) = 0.94, 95% CI (0.47, 1.89)], p =0.87] and OS 94% vs. 80%, [OS HR (C/control) = 0.40, 95% CI (0.12, 1.28)], p =0.12]. Conclusion Adjuvant chemotherapy should be recommended for patients with completely resected isolated loco-regional recurrences of breast cancer, in particular, if the recurrence is not sensitive to endocrine therapy. Funding NCI PHS grants U10-CA-37377, -69974, -12027, -69651, CA-75362. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2012;72(24 Suppl):Abstract nr S3-2.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.