In the catheter ablation for AF, we found no significant reduction in the 1-year incidence of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias by ATP-guided PVI compared with conventional PVI.
Short-term use of AAD for 90 days following AF ablation reduced the incidence of recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias during the treatment period, but it did not lead to improved clinical outcomes at the later phase.
The prevalence, intensity, safety, and efficacy of oral anticoagulation (OAC) in addition to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in "real-world" patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have not yet been fully evaluated. In the Coronary REvascularization Demonstrating Outcome Study in Kyoto registry cohort-2, a total of 1,057 patients with AF (8.3%) were identified among 12,716 patients undergoing first PCI. Cumulative 5-year incidence of stroke was higher in patients with AF than in no-AF patients (12.8% vs 5.8%, p <0.0001). Although most patients with AF had CHADS2 score ≥2 (75.2%), only 506 patients (47.9%) received OAC with warfarin at hospital discharge. Cumulative 5-year incidence of stroke in the OAC group was not different from that in the no-OAC group (13.8% vs 11.8%, p = 0.49). Time in therapeutic range (TTR) was only 52.6% with an international normalized ratio of 1.6 to 2.6, and only 154 of 409 patients (37.7%) with international normalized ratio data had TTR ≥65%. Cumulative 5-year incidence of stroke in patients with TTR ≥65% was markedly lower than that in patients with TTR <65% (6.9% vs 15.1%, p = 0.01). In a 4-month landmark analysis in the OAC group, there was a trend for higher cumulative incidences of stroke and major bleeding in the on-DAPT (n = 286) than in the off-DAPT (n = 173) groups (15.1% vs 6.7%, p = 0.052 and 14.7% vs 8.7%, p = 0.10, respectively). In conclusion, OAC was underused and its intensity was mostly suboptimal in real-world patients with AF undergoing PCI, which lead to inadequate stroke prevention. Long-term DAPT in patients receiving OAC did not reduce stroke incidence.
Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) has become widely used for drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (AF). However, there is a paucity of data on the long-term clinical outcomes after RFCA for AF. The aim of the present study was to investigate the very long-term outcomes after RFCA for AF in a large number of consecutive patients. Methods and results: In this retrospective single-center study, we evaluated very long-term follow-up results in 1206 consecutive patients undergoing first RFCA for AF. The primary outcomes were adverse outcomes at 30-day as a safety outcome measure and event-free rates from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias as efficacy outcome measures. Final follow-up rate reached 99.3% with a mean follow-up duration of 5.0 ± 2.5 years. The incidence of overall 30-day adverse outcomes was 3.6% without death. The 10-year event-free rates from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias after the initial and last procedures were 46.9% and 76.4%, respectively. Arrhythmia recurrence occurred most commonly during the first year and decreased beyond 3-year, although it continued to occur at an annual rate of 2.0% and 1.3%, respectively, throughout the 10-year follow-up period. The cumulative 10-year incidences of stroke and major bleeding were 4.2% and 3.5%, respectively, with annual rates of 0.3%. Discontinuation rate of oral anticoagulation at 1-, 3-, and 10-year was 34.6%, 53.4%, 58.0% and 61.9%. Conclusions: RFCA for AF provided favorable very long-term arrhythmia-free survival without much safety concerns. The 10-year rates of stroke and major bleeding were low even with discontinuation of oral anticoagulation in a large proportion of patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.