Maintenance therapy has become a hot field in myeloma, and it may be particularly relevant in elderly patients because the major benefit results from the initial therapy. We report the results of a randomized comparison of maintenance with bortezomib plus thalidomide (VT) or prednisone (VP) in 178 elderly untreated myeloma patients who had received 6 induction cycles with bortezomib plus either melphalan and prednisone or thalidomide and prednisone. The complete response (CR) rate increased from 24% after induction up to 42%, higher for VT versus VP (46% vs 39%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was superior for VT (39 months) compared with VP (32 months) and overall survival (OS) was also longer in VT patients compared with VP (5-year OS of 69% and 50%, respectively) but the differences did not reach statistical significance. CR achievement was associated with a significantly longer PFS (P < .001) and 5-year OS (P < .001). The incidence of G3-4 peripheral neuropathy was 9% for VT and 3% for VP. Unfortunately, this approach was not able to overcome the adverse prognosis of cytogenetic abnormalities. In summary, these maintenance regimens result in a significant increase in CR rate, remarkably long PFS, and acceptable toxicity profile. The trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00443235. (Blood. 2012;120(13): 2581-2588) IntroductionMultiple myeloma (MM) is the second most frequent hematologic malignancy and it usually affects elderly patients. Melphalan and prednisone (MP) has been the standard of care in the past for this patient population, resulting in complete response (CR) rates ranging from 2% to 5% with median overall survival (OS) from 2 to 3 years. [1][2][3] The introduction of novel agents thalidomide (Thal), bortezomib (V), and lenalidomide (R) for the treatment of elderly MM patients has significantly increased the CR rate, and this translated into prolonged time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and OS. Therefore, the concept of "the longer the duration of the response the longer the survival" used for most hematologic malignancies would also be applicable to MM and particularly to elderly patients because (usually) two-thirds of the survival duration in the elderly population derives from the efficacy of the first line of therapy. Accordingly, an attractive current challenge is to explore the capacity of novel agents, such as thalidomide, bortezomib, and lenalidomide to maintain the high response rate achieved upfront with these drug combinations. 4 Concerning Thal, 6 randomized trials have compared MP and Thal (MPT) with MP, 5-10 and in 3 of them Thal was also used as maintenance therapy until disease progression. 5,8,9 Maintenance induced an improvement in both overall response rate (ORR; upgrade ranging from 17% up to 30%) and PFS (prolongation ranging from 2 up to 7 months) but with only marginal benefit for OS. An Austrian trial has compared the value of Thal plus interferon maintenance versus interferon alone in elderly patients who had received inductio...

Key Points Melphalan, in combination with bortezomib, should be maintained as one of the standards of care for the treatment of elderly MM patients. Complete response and particularly flow complete response should be an important goal in the treatment of elderly myeloma patients.

The results of intensive immunochemotherapy were analyzed in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related Burkitt lymphoma/leukemia (BLL) in two cohorts (Spain and Germany). Alternating cycles of chemotherapy were administered, with dose reductions for patients over 55 years. Eighty percent of patients achieved remission, 11% died during induction, 9% failed and 7% died in remission. Four-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) probabilities were 72% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62-82%) and 71% (95% CI: 61-81%). CD4 T-cell count < 200/μL and bone marrow involvement were associated with poor OS (hazard ratio [HR] 3.2 [1.2-8.3] and HR 2.7 [1.1-6.6]) and PFS (HR 3.5 [1.3-9.1] and HR 2.4 [1-5.7]), bone marrow involvement with poor disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 14.4 [1.7-119.7] and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score > 2 (odds ratio [OR] 11.9 [1.4-99.9]) with induction death. In HIV-related BLL, intensive immunochemotherapy was feasible and effective, but toxic. Prognostic factors were performance status, CD4 T-cell count and bone marrow involvement.

In patients with multiple myeloma (MM) undergoing autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT), peripheral blood progenitor cells may be collected following mobilization with growth factor alone (GF) or cytotoxic chemotherapy plus GF (CC+GF). It is uncertain whether the method of mobilization affects post-transplant outcomes. We compared these mobilization strategies in a retrospective analysis of 968 patients with MM from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database who received an auto-HCT in the US and Canada between 2007 and 2012. The kinetics of neutrophil engraftment (⩾ 0.5 × 10 9 /L) was similar between groups (13 vs 13 days, P = 0.69) while platelet engraftment (⩾ 20 × 10 9 /L) was slightly faster with CC+GF (19 vs 18 days, P = 0.006). Adjusted 3-year PFS was 43% (95% confidence interval (CI) 38-48) in GF and 40% (95% CI 35-45) in CC+GF, P = 0.33. Adjusted 3-year OS was 82% (95% CI 78-86) vs 80% (95% CI 75-84), P = 0.43 and adjusted 5-year OS was 62% (95% CI 54-68) vs 60% (95% CI 52-67), P = 0.76, for GF and CC+GF, respectively. We conclude that MM patients undergoing auto-HCT have similar outcomes irrespective of the method of mobilization and found no evidence that the addition of chemotherapy to mobilization contributes to disease control.

To evaluate the clinical value of the concurrent use of methotrexate administered immediately before paclitaxel, we investigated the efficacy and toxicity of this two-drug combination administered as palliative second line therapy in patients with advanced urothelial cancer. The design of the schedule and sequence used was based on our previous preclinical data from a comparative study on sequential combinations of paclitaxel and methotrexate in a human bladder cancer cell line. As a confirmation study, we further extended our analysis of in vitro synergism. Twenty patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract previously treated with platinum-based therapy, with adequate renal function and a performance status > or = 60 were considered eligible. They received therapy with methotrexate 30 mg/m2 administered as an intravenous bolus, followed immediately by paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 given as a 3-hr infusion, both on day 1 every 21 days. Therapy was given on a compassionate-use basis until either disease progression was documented or the patient became intolerant to therapy. In vitro data were further analyzed using the median-effect principle and the combination index method. Twenty patients with metastatic (16 patients) or locally advanced disease (four patients) received a median of three cycles of therapy. Of the 19 patients assessable for response, there were six partial responses and seven disease stabilizations with no complete responses. Median duration of response was 3 months (range, 2-7) and median survival was 5 months. Three patients developed grade 3-4 neutropenia, one patient had grade 3 anemia, four patients had grade 2-3 sensory neuropathy, and three patients had myalgias. Eighteen patients developed alopecia. Gastrointestinal toxicity was mild. One patient died after the first cycle due to pulmonary thrombo-embolism and could not be evaluated for response. The synergistic in vitro effect of the concurrent combination was confirmed in analyses performed under mutually exclusive and mutually nonexclusive criteria. In conclusion, the combination of methotrexate and paclitaxel at this dose and sequence is feasible and active as a palliative therapy in patients with advanced urothelial cancer previously treated with platinum-based therapies. This schedule merits further investigation in a phase-II trial.