ObjectivePrevious studies suggested that microRNA-21 may be upregulated in the liver in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), but its role in the development of this disease remains unknown. This study aimed to determine the role of microRNA-21 in NASH.DesignWe inhibited or suppressed microRNA-21 in different mouse models of NASH: (a) low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient (Ldlr−/−) mice fed a high-fat diet and treated with antagomir-21 or antagomir control; (b) microRNA-21-deficient and wild-type mice fed a methionine-choline-deficient (MCD) diet; (c) peroxisome proliferation-activator receptor α (PPARα)-deficient mice fed an MCD diet and treated with antagomir-21 or antagomir control. We assessed features of NASH and determined liver microRNA-21 levels and cell localisation. MicroRNA-21 levels were also quantified in the liver of patients with NASH, bland steatosis or normal liver and localisation was determined.ResultsInhibiting or suppressing liver microRNA-21 expression reduced liver cell injury, inflammation and fibrogenesis without affecting liver lipid accumulation in Ldlr−/− fed a high-fat diet and in wild-type mice fed an MCD diet. Liver microRNA-21 was overexpressed, primarily in biliary and inflammatory cells, in mouse models as well as in patients with NASH, but not in patients with bland steatosis. PPARα, a known microRNA-21 target, implicated in NASH, was decreased in the liver of mice with NASH and restored following microRNA-21 inhibition or suppression. The effect of antagomir-21 was lost in PPARα-deficient mice.ConclusionsMicroRNA-21 inhibition or suppression decreases liver injury, inflammation and fibrosis, by restoring PPARα expression. Antagomir-21 might be a future therapeutic strategy for NASH.

Deficient autophagy induces inflammation, features of endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition and apoptosis.Deficiency in endothelial autophagy promotes liver inflammation, liver cell apoptosis and liver perisinusoidal fibrosis.

Liver biopsy of metastatic pancreatic endocrine tumors allows confirmation of the diagnosis and assessment of prognosis. However, sampling variability is a potential limitation. Our aim was to use the tissue microarray technique to assess the heterogeneity of three prognostic markers, ie, MIB-1 proliferation index, microvascular density and somatostatin receptor type 2, inside single or between synchronous or metachronous liver metastases of pancreatic endocrine tumors. Tissue microarrays were constructed, which included core biopsies taken from surgically resected liver metastases in 29 patients. MIB-1, microvascular density and somatostatin receptor type 2 were evaluated after immunostaining. The heterogeneity was highlighted by the calculation of the reproducibility of the values of two cores randomly selected among all the cores studied. For quantitative variables, it was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient and by a Bland-Altman approach. For qualitative variables, observed agreement and weighted j were given. A total of 184 liver metastases were analyzed. For MIB-1, the intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.63, 0.69 and 0.67 and for microvascular density, the intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.48, 0.60 and 0.00, respectively, in single, synchronous and metachronous liver metastases. The variability increased for higher mean values of microvascular density. For somatostatin receptor type 2, the observed agreements were 91% (j ¼ 0.81), 69% (j ¼ 0.49) and 79% (j ¼ 0.68) in single, synchronous and metachronous liver metastases, respectively. In conclusion, tissue microarray analysis identifies heterogeneity of protein expression in pancreatic endocrine metastases, which depends on the marker tested. The reproducibility is better for MIB-1 and somatostatin receptor type 2 than for microvascular density. Sampling variability should be taken into consideration as a potential limitation to the assessment of prognostic and therapeutic markers in biopsy samples from metastatic pancreatic endocrine tumors.