JapicCTI-101021.

Purpose: We conducted a first-in-human phase I study to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile, and document any antitumor activity of NK012, a novel SN-38-incorporating micellar nanoparticle.Experimental Design: Patients with solid tumors refractory to standard therapy, or for which no standard therapy is available, were enrolled. NK012 was administered as a 30-minute infusion every 3 weeks. The starting dose was 2 mg/m 2 as SN-38 equivalent, and an accelerated titration schedule was used. Pharmacokinetic analysis was conducted in cycles 1 and 2. Results: Twenty-four patients were enrolled in the study. No UGT1A1*28 homozygous patients were enrolled. Predominant toxicity was neutropenia. Nonhematologic toxicity, especially diarrhea, was mostly grade 1 or 2 during study treatments. Two of nine patients had DLT during cycle 1 at the 28 mg/m 2 dose level. DLTs were mostly neutropenia or a related event. Polymer-bound SN-38 (NK012) and SN-38 released from NK012 were slowly eliminated from the plasma, with a terminal-phase half-life of approximately 140 and 210 hours, respectively. Systemic exposure to both polymer-bound SN-38 and SN-38 increased in proportion to the dose. A refractory esophageal cancer patient and a lung carcinoid tumor patient had an objective response and continued the study treatment for 5 and 12 months, respectively.Conclusions: NK012 was well tolerated and showed antitumor activity including partial responses and several occurrences of prolonged stable disease across a variety of advanced refractory cancers. Phase II studies are ongoing. Clin Cancer Res; 16(20); 5058-66. ©2010 AACR.Irinotecan hydrochloride (CPT-11) has proven to be active against colorectal, lung, and ovarian cancers (1-5). CPT-11 is a prodrug that is converted to a biologically active metabolite, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxy-CPT (SN-38), by carboxylesterase (CE) enzymes. SN-38 is an analogue of the plant alkaloid camptothecin, which targets DNA topoisomerase I. Compared with CPT-11, SN-38 exhibits up to 1,000-fold more potent cytotoxic activity against various cancer cells in vitro (6). Although CPT-11 is converted to SN-38 in the liver and tumor, the metabolic conversion rate is <10% of the original volume of 8). Moreover, the conversion of CPT-11 to SN-38 depends on the genetic interindividual variability of CE activity (9). Thus, more efficient use of SN-38 might be highly advantageous and quite attractive for cancer treatment.Drugs categorized under the drug delivery system (DDS) are made primarily by using nanotechnology (10). In the field of oncology, DDS drugs have been produced and evaluated in preclinical or clinical trials, with some already approved for clinical use (11,12). NK012 categorized in DDS is a micelle-forming macromolecular prodrug prepared by binding SN-38 to the polyglutamate of a block copolymer via an ester bond (Fig. 1). The amphiphilic block copolymers consist of polyethylene glycol and partially SN-38-bound polyglutamate. Polyethylene glycol is hydrophilic a...

BackgroundThe mutation in KRAS exon 2 is a validated biomarker of resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Several reports have confirmed associations of other RAS mutations with resistance to anti-EGFR therapy. However, the impact of BRAF and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy remains controversial. Little is known about the frequencies and clinicopathological features of these mutations, as well as the therapeutic effects of anti-EGFR therapy in mCRC patients with these mutations, especially in the Asian population.MethodsIn this retrospective observational study, frequencies and clinicopathological features of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations were evaluated in patients with mCRC. Among patients treated with anti-EGFR therapy, objective response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated according to gene status.ResultsAmong 264 patients, mutations in KRAS exon 2, KRAS exons 3 or 4, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA were detected in 34.1%, 3.8%, 4.2%, 5.4% and 6.4%, respectively. Thus, a total of 12.1% of patients without KRAS exon 2 mutations had other RAS mutations. Primary rectal tumors tended to be more frequently observed in RAS mutant tumors. BRAF mutations were more frequently observed with right-sided colon, poorly differentiated or mucinous adenocarcinoma, and peritoneal metastasis. Among the 66 patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type tumors treated with anti-EGFR agents, PFS (5.8 vs. 2.2 months) and OS (17.7 vs. 5.2 months) were significantly better in patients with all wild-type tumors (n = 56) than in those with any of the mutations (n = 10). The response rate also tended to be better with all wild-type tumors (26.8 vs. 0%).ConclusionOther RAS and BRAF mutations were observed in KRAS exon 2 wild-type tumors, which were associated with some clinicopathological features and resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in our patient cohort.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1276-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

BackgroundThis multicenter, randomized phase II trial was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of nimotuzumab plus irinotecan (N-IRI) versus irinotecan alone (IRI) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) showing disease progression after previous 5-fluorouracil-based therapy.MethodsIrinotecan-naive patients (n = 82) received N-IRI (nimotuzumab 400 mg weekly plus irinotecan 150 mg/m2 biweekly) or IRI (irinotecan 150 mg/m2 biweekly) until disease progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), response rate (RR), safety, tolerability, and the correlation between efficacy and tumor epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression.ResultsOf 83 patients, 40 and 43 patients were randomly assigned to the N-IRI and IRI groups, respectively. In the N-IRI/IRI treatment group, median PFS was 73.0/85.0 days (P = 0.5668), and median OS and RR at 18 months were 250.5/232.0 days (P = 0.9778) and 18.4/10.3 %, respectively. Median PFS and OS in the EGFR 2+/3+ subgroups were 118.5/59.0 and 358.5/229.5 days, respectively. The RR was 33.3/0.0 % in the N-IRI/IRI treatment group. The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events was 77.5/64.3 %. No adverse events of grade 3 or higher skin rash or grade 3 or higher infusion-related reaction were reported.ConclusionsThere was no superiority of N-IRI over IRI alone in terms of PFS in 5-fluorouracil-refractory AGC patients. However, N-IRI showed potential improvement in the EGFR 2+/3+ subgroup based on improved RR, PFS, and OS.

These findings indicate that SOX regimen with oxaliplatin at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) is feasible and shows promising efficacy against advanced gastric cancer.