Objective The main devastating complication of FMF is AA amyloidosis. Approximately 10–15% of the patients are either intolerant or have an insufficient response to colchicine treatment. The most promising alternative treatment approach is anti-IL-1 agents. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-IL-1 therapy in FMF amyloidosis. Methods Forty-four patients with amyloidosis who had been treated with anti-IL-1 agents, anakinra and/or canakinumab, were assessed retrospectively for efficacy and safety. Five patients were on haemodialysis and four had received a renal transplant. Results The mean duration of anti-IL-1 treatment was 21.4  (18) months. Among 35 patients who were not on dialysis, renal function was maintained or improved in 79.4% but deteriorated in 20.6%. Patients with creatinine levels below 1.5 mg/dl at onset benefitted more from IL-1 inhibition with regard to their kidney functions and acute phase reactants. No additional side effects were observed in patients with renal replacement treatments. The major side effect of anakinra was injection-site reaction observed in four patients. Conclusion Anti-IL-1 agents are well tolerated and effective in the treatment of amyloidosis secondary to FMF, including patients on dialysis and renal transplant recipients. This approach may improve the lifespan of transplanted kidneys in FMF patients.

Background There is no standard treatment recommended at category 1 level in international guidelines for subsequent therapy after cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6) based therapy. We aimed to evaluate which subsequent treatment oncologists prefer in patients with disease progression under CDKi. In addition, we aimed to show the effectiveness of systemic treatments after CDKi and whether there is a survival difference between hormonal treatments (monotherapy vs. mTOR-based). Methods A total of 609 patients from 53 centers were included in the study. Progression-free-survivals (PFS) of subsequent treatments (chemotherapy (CT, n:434) or endocrine therapy (ET, n:175)) after CDKi were calculated. Patients were evaluated in three groups as those who received CDKi in first-line (group A, n:202), second-line (group B, n: 153) and ≥ 3rd-line (group C, n: 254). PFS was compared according to the use of ET and CT. In addition, ET was compared as monotherapy versus everolimus-based combination therapy. Results The median duration of CDKi in the ET arms of Group A, B, and C was 17.0, 11.0, and 8.5 months in respectively; it was 9.0, 7.0, and 5.0 months in the CT arm. Median PFS after CDKi was 9.5 (5.0–14.0) months in the ET arm of group A, and 5.3 (3.9–6.8) months in the CT arm (p = 0.073). It was 6.7 (5.8–7.7) months in the ET arm of group B, and 5.7 (4.6–6.7) months in the CT arm (p = 0.311). It was 5.3 (2.5–8.0) months in the ET arm of group C and 4.0 (3.5–4.6) months in the CT arm (p = 0.434). Patients who received ET after CDKi were compared as those who received everolimus-based combination therapy versus those who received monotherapy ET: the median PFS in group A, B, and C was 11.0 vs. 5.9 (p = 0.047), 6.7 vs. 5.0 (p = 0.164), 6.7 vs. 3.9 (p = 0.763) months. Conclusion Physicians preferred CT rather than ET in patients with early progression under CDKi. It has been shown that subsequent ET after CDKi can be as effective as CT. It was also observed that better PFS could be achieved with the subsequent everolimus-based treatments after first-line CDKi compared to monotherapy ET.

Objective In patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPCa), enzalutamide is administered when docetaxel treatment fails. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the relationship between prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and metabolic parameters obtained from 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT before treatment in this patient group. Methods From February 2018 to May 2020, 34 patients with mCRPCa were enrolled in this study. The association between PSA response (at least 50% decrease compared to the pretreatment value) and quantitative prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression parameters such as SUVmax, SUVmean, PSMA-TV (PSMA receptor-expressing tumor volume) and TL-PSMA (total lesion PSMA receptor expression) were evaluated. Results Mean SUVmax, SUVmean, PSMA receptor-expressing tumor volume (PSMA-TV) and total lesion PSMA receptor expression (TL-PSMA) values were 33.66 ± 20.42; 8.82 ± 5.03; 319.85 ± 615.12 cm3; and 2894.76 ± 5195.13, respectively. In the posttreatment 12th week, 22 patients (64.7%) had PSA response, while 12 patients (35.3%) were nonresponders. In patients with PSA response, PSMA-TV values were significantly lower than nonresponders (78.37 ± 80.99 cm3 vs. 451.58 ± 734.61 cm3; P = 0.028). But there was no significant difference between responders and nonresponders in terms of age, ISUP grade, SUVmax, SUVmean, TL-PSMA, pretreatment PSA values, presence of local recurrence or metastases at any site. Conclusion PSMA-TV values on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging before starting enzalutamide treatment following docetaxel failure can predict PSA response in patients with mCRPCa.

ObjectiveCisplatin-paclitaxel and bevacizumab is a frequently used treatment regimen for metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer, and carboplatin-paclitaxel and bevacizumab are also among the recommended regimens. In this study we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of these two regimens for the treatment of metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer.MethodsPatients with metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer treated with cisplatin-paclitaxel and bevacizumab or carboplatin-paclitaxel and bevacizumab were retrospectively evaluated in this study. The clinical and demographic characteristics of patients in each group were evaluated. Median overall survival, progression-free survival, and response rates between the two groups were compared.ResultsA total of 250 patients were included. Overall, the numbers of patients with recurrent disease and metastatic disease were 159 and 91, respectively. The most common histologic subtype was squamous cell carcinoma (83.2%). The median duration of follow-up was 13.6 (range 0.5–86) months. The median progression-free survival was 10.5 (95% CI 9.0 to 11.8) months in the cisplatin-paclitaxel and bevacizumab group (group 1), and 10.8 (95% CI 8.6 to 13.0) months in the carboplatin-paclitaxel and bevacizumab group (group 2) (HR 1.20; 95% CI 0.88 to 1.63; p=0.25). The median overall survival was 19.1 (95% CI 13.0 to 25.1) months in group 1 and 18.3 (95% CI 15.3 to 21.3) months in group 2 (HR 1.28; 95% CI 0.91 to 1.80; p=0.15).ConclusionsThere is no survival difference between cisplatin or carboplatin combined with paclitaxel and bevacizumab in metastatic or recurrent cervical cancer.

Objectives Anakinra is proven to be effective in controlled trials in terms of attack frequency and subclinical inflammation in colchicine-resistant patients. The objective of this study was to review the patients followed in our single centre with FMF who received anakinra because of insufficient colchicine response. Methods The study was conducted at a tertiary rheumatology centre experienced in autoinflammatory diseases. The patients were treated for at least 1 month with anakinra. Patients with amyloidosis and pregnancy were not included. Attack frequency, patient global assessment scales of disease severity and acute phase reactants were recorded before and throughout anakinra treatment. Criteria of treatment termination were side effects, disease remission, inadequate response, pregnancy plan and non-compliance. Results One hundred and six patients diagnosed with FMF were treated with anakinra; 45.92% of the patients had a homozygous M694V mutation; 83 of the 98 patients tested for MEFV carried at least one copy of M694V. Attack frequency decreased while on anakinra treatment; in fact, no attacks were observed in 75 patients. Visual analogue scale score decreased from 7.49 (2.03) to 3.08 (2.82) (P = 0.001). Currently, 71 patients are still on anakinra treatment. Treatment of 34 patients was discontinued (32%). Insufficient response and side effects were the most common reasons for treatment discontinuation. All of the side effects observed were reversible and the patients alleviated after treatment cessation. In four patients, leukopenia was observed. Conclusion In patients who were refractory to colchicine, anti-IL-1 agent anakinra was shown to be effective and safe. The effectiveness of anakinra stems from preventing attacks and increasing the quality of life.