BACKGROUNDDuring the current worldwide pandemic, coronavirus disease 2019 was first diagnosed in Iceland at the end of February. However, data are limited on how SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes Covid-19, enters and spreads in a population. METHODSWe targeted testing to persons living in Iceland who were at high risk for infection (mainly those who were symptomatic, had recently traveled to high-risk countries, or had contact with infected persons). We also carried out population screening using two strategies: issuing an open invitation to 10,797 persons and sending random invitations to 2283 persons. We sequenced SARS-CoV-2 from 643 samples. RESULTSAs of April 4, a total of 1221 of 9199 persons (13.3%) who were recruited for targeted testing had positive results for infection with SARS-CoV-2. Of those tested in the general population, 87 (0.8%) in the open-invitation screening and 13 (0.6%) in the random-population screening tested positive for the virus. In total, 6% of the population was screened. Most persons in the targeted-testing group who received positive tests early in the study had recently traveled internationally, in contrast to those who tested positive later in the study. Children under 10 years of age were less likely to receive a positive result than were persons 10 years of age or older, with percentages of 6.7% and 13.7%, respectively, for targeted testing; in the population screening, no child under 10 years of age had a positive result, as compared with 0.8% of those 10 years of age or older. Fewer females than males received positive results both in targeted testing (11.0% vs. 16.7%) and in population screening (0.6% vs. 0.9%). The haplotypes of the sequenced SARS-CoV-2 viruses were diverse and changed over time. The percentage of infected participants that was determined through population screening remained stable for the 20-day duration of screening. CONCLUSIONSIn a population-based study in Iceland, children under 10 years of age and females had a lower incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection than adolescents or adults and males. The proportion of infected persons identified through population screening did not change substantially during the screening period, which was consistent with a beneficial effect of containment efforts. (Funded by deCODE Genetics-Amgen.

Background Little is known about the nature and durability of the humoral immune response to infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Methods We measured antibodies in serum samples from 30,576 persons in Iceland, using six assays (including two pan-immunoglobulin [pan-Ig] assays), and we determined that the appropriate measure of seropositivity was a positive result with both pan-Ig assays. We tested 2102 samples collected from 1237 persons up to 4 months after diagnosis by a quantitative polymerase-chain-reaction (qPCR) assay. We measured antibodies in 4222 quarantined persons who had been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 and in 23,452 persons not known to have been exposed. Results Of the 1797 persons who had recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection, 1107 of the 1215 who were tested (91.1%) were seropositive; antiviral antibody titers assayed by two pan-Ig assays increased during 2 months after diagnosis by qPCR and remained on a plateau for the remainder of the study. Of quarantined persons, 2.3% were seropositive; of those with unknown exposure, 0.3% were positive. We estimate that 0.9% of Icelanders were infected with SARS-CoV-2 and that the infection was fatal in 0.3%. We also estimate that 56% of all SARS-CoV-2 infections in Iceland had been diagnosed with qPCR, 14% had occurred in quarantined persons who had not been tested with qPCR (or who had not received a positive result, if tested), and 30% had occurred in persons outside quarantine and not tested with qPCR. Conclusions Our results indicate that antiviral antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 did not decline within 4 months after diagnosis. We estimate that the risk of death from infection was 0.3% and that 44% of persons infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Iceland were not diagnosed by qPCR.

Receptors for prostanoids on platelets include the EP3 receptor for which the natural agonist is the inflammatory mediator prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) produced in atherosclerotic plaques. EP3 is implicated in atherothrombosis and an EP3 antagonist might provide atherosclerotic lesion-specific antithrombotic therapy. DG-041 (2,3-dichlorothiophene-5-sulfonic acid, 3-[1-(2,4-dichlorobenzyl)-5-fluoro-3-methyl-1H-indol-7-yl]acryloylamide) is a direct-acting EP3 antagonist currently being evaluated in Phase 2 clinical trials. We have examined the contributions of EP3 to platelet function using the selective EP3 agonist sulprostone and also PGE(2), and determined the effects of DG-041 on these. Studies were in human platelet-rich plasma or whole blood and included aggregometry and flow cytometry. Sulprostone enhanced aggregation induced by primary agonists including collagen, TRAP, platelet activating factor, U46619, serotonin and adenosine diphosphate, and enhanced P-selectin expression and platelet-leukocyte conjugate formation. It inhibited adenylate cyclase (measured by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation) and enhanced Ca(2+) mobilization. It potentiated platelet function even in the presence of aspirin and/or AR-C69931 (a P2Y(12) antagonist). DG-041 antagonized the effects of sulprostone on platelet function. The effect of PGE(2) on platelet aggregation depended on the nature of the agonist and the concentration of PGE(2) used as a consequence of both pro-aggregatory effects via EP3 and anti-aggregatory effects via other receptors. DG-041 potentiated the protective effects of PGE(2) on platelet aggregation by inhibiting the pro-aggregatory effect via EP3 stimulation. DG-041 remained effective in the presence of a P2Y(12) antagonist and aspirin. DG-041 warrants continued investigation as a potential agent for the treatment of atherothrombosis without inducing unwanted bleeding risk.