In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process vs. those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process); thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from stimuli that result in increased autophagic activity, defined as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the field understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field

Staphylococcus aureus is a common bacterial etiology of serious infectious diseases. S. aureus can invade various types of non-professional phagocytes to produce host cell death. We show here that shortly after invasion of HeLa cells S. aureus transit to autophagosomes was characterized by double membranes and co-localization with LC3. S. aureus were not able to replicate and produce cell death in autophagy-deficient atg5 ؊/؊ mouse embryonic fibroblasts. S. aureus-containing autophagosomes do not acidify nor do they acquire lysosome-associated membrane protein-2, indicating that S. aureus inhibits autophagosome maturation and fusion with lysosomes. Eventually, S. aureus escape from autophagosomes into the cytoplasm, which results in caspase-independent host cell death. S. aureus strains deficient for agr, a global regulator of S. aureus virulence, were not targeted by autophagy and did not produce host-cell death. Autophagy induction by rapamycin restored both replication and cytotoxicity of agr-deficient S. aureus strains, indicating that an agr-regulated factor(s) is required for autophagy-mediated cytotoxicity. The results of this study suggest that rapid induction of autophagy is essential for S. aureus replication, escape into the cytoplasm, and host cell killing.Staphylococcus aureus is the major cause of community-acquired and nosocomial infections such as pneumonia, endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and wound infections (1, 2). An important feature of S. aureus is the ability to invade the vascular system from local infection sites (3). Such dissemination includes passing across cellular barriers like the endothelial barrier, which leads to bacteremia and sepsis. Recent studies revealed the consistent ability of S. aureus to infect various types of non-professional phagocytic host cells such as keratinocytes, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and epithelial cells (4 -6). Adherence to and invasion of non-professional phagocytic cells by S. aureus has been implicated in the pathogenesis of invasive and metastatic infections i.e. during hematogenous dissemination (7).We have recently shown that some but not all S. aureus strains are able to induce host cell death after invasion, which correlates with the virulence of a particular S. aureus strain (8). However, the exact molecular mechanisms leading to intracellular survival of S. aureus and death of host cells remained unclear. Although some investigators reported induction of caspase-dependent programmed cell death (apoptosis) involving tumor necrosis factor or CD95 signaling pathways, others observed necrosis of S. aureus-infected host cells induced by ␣-toxin (9 -11).In many cases microorganisms internalized by host cells are efficiently eliminated by host defense mechanisms. The microbial phagosome matures by sequential transient fusion events with early and late endosomal compartments, which are controlled by Rab GTPases (12). However, some pathogens like Mycobacteria tuberculosis, Legionella pneumophila, and Brucella abortus have evolved species-specific mec...

SUMMARYThe recent Zika virus (ZIKV) epidemic is associated with microcephaly in newborns. Although the connection between ZIKV and neurodevelopmental defects is widely recognized, the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Here we show that two recently isolated strains of ZIKV, an American strain from an infected fetal brain (FB-GWUH-2016) and a closely-related Asian strain (H/PF/2013), productively infect human iPSC-derived brain organoids. Both of these strains readily target to and replicate in proliferating ventricular zone (VZ) apical progenitors. The main phenotypic effect was premature differentiation of neural progenitors associated with centrosome perturbation, even during early stages of infection, leading to progenitor depletion, disruption of the VZ, impaired neurogenesis, and cortical thinning. The infection pattern and cellular outcome differ from those seen with the extensively passaged ZIKV strain MR766. The structural changes we see after infection with these more recently isolated viral strains closely resemble those seen in ZIKV-associated microcephaly.

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by NADPH oxidase function as defence and signalling molecules related to innate immunity and various cellular responses. The activation of NADPH oxidase in response to plasma membrane receptor activation depends on the phosphorylation of cytoplasmic oxidase subunits, their translocation to membranes and the assembly of all NADPH oxidase components. Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) is a prominent stimulus of ROS production, but the molecular mechanisms by which TNF activates NADPH oxidase are poorly understood. Here we identify riboflavin kinase (RFK, formerly known as flavokinase) as a previously unrecognized TNF-receptor-1 (TNFR1)-binding protein that physically and functionally couples TNFR1 to NADPH oxidase. In mouse and human cells, RFK binds to both the TNFR1-death domain and to p22(phox), the common subunit of NADPH oxidase isoforms. RFK-mediated bridging of TNFR1 and p22(phox) is a prerequisite for TNF-induced but not for Toll-like-receptor-induced ROS production. Exogenous flavin mononucleotide or FAD was able to substitute fully for TNF stimulation of NADPH oxidase in RFK-deficient cells. RFK is rate-limiting in the synthesis of FAD, an essential prosthetic group of NADPH oxidase. The results suggest that TNF, through the activation of RFK, enhances the incorporation of FAD in NADPH oxidase enzymes, a critical step for the assembly and activation of NADPH oxidase.

BackgroundMedium density DNA microchips that carry a collection of probes for a broad spectrum of pathogens, have the potential to be powerful tools for simultaneous species identification, detection of virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance determinants. However, their widespread use in microbiological diagnostics is limited by the problem of low pathogen numbers in clinical specimens revealing relatively low amounts of pathogen DNA.ResultsTo increase the detection power of a fluorescence-based prototype-microarray designed to identify pathogenic microorganisms involved in sepsis, we propose a large scale multiplex PCR (LSplex PCR) for amplification of several dozens of gene-segments of 9 pathogenic species. This protocol employs a large set of primer pairs, potentially able to amplify 800 different gene segments that correspond to the capture probes spotted on the microarray. The LSplex protocol is shown to selectively amplify only the gene segments corresponding to the specific pathogen present in the analyte. Application of LSplex increases the microarray detection of target templates by a factor of 100 to 1000.ConclusionOur data provide a proof of principle for the improvement of detection of pathogen DNA by microarray hybridization by using LSplex PCR.