Neurocysticercosis is the most common helminthic infection of the CNS but its diagnosis remains difficult. Clinical manifestations are nonspecific, most neuroimaging findings are not pathognomonic, and some serologic tests have low sensitivity and specificity. The authors provide diagnostic criteria for neurocysticercosis based on objective clinical, imaging, immunologic, and epidemiologic data. These include four categories of criteria stratified on the basis of their diagnostic strength, including the following: 1) absolute-histologic demonstration of the parasite from biopsy of a brain or spinal cord lesion, cystic lesions showing the scolex on CT or MRI, and direct visualization of subretinal parasites by funduscopic examination; 2) major-lesions highly suggestive of neurocysticercosis on neuroimaging studies, positive serum enzyme-linked immunoelectrotransfer blot for the detection of anticysticercal antibodies, resolution of intracranial cystic lesions after therapy with albendazole or praziquantel, and spontaneous resolution of small single enhancing lesions; 3) minor-lesions compatible with neurocysticercosis on neuroimaging studies, clinical manifestations suggestive of neurocysticercosis, positive CSF enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of anticysticercal antibodies or cysticercal antigens, and cysticercosis outside the CNS; and 4) epidemiologic-evidence of a household contact with Taenia solium infection, individuals coming from or living in an area where cysticercosis is endemic, and history of frequent travel to disease-endemic areas. Interpretation of these criteria permits two degrees of diagnostic certainty: 1) definitive diagnosis, in patients who have one

Taenia solium neurocysticercosis is a common cause of epileptic seizures and other neurological morbidity in most developing countries. It is also an increasingly common diagnosis in industrialized countries because of immigration from areas where it is endemic. Its clinical manifestations are highly variable and depend on the number, stage, and size of the lesions and the host's immune response. In part due to this variability, major discrepancies exist in the treatment of neurocysticercosis. A panel of experts in taeniasis/cysticercosis discussed the evidence on treatment of neurocysticercosis for each clinical presentation, and we present the panel's consensus and areas of disagreement. Overall, four general recommendations were made: (i) individualize therapeutic decisions, including whether to use antiparasitic drugs, based on the number, location, and viability of the parasites within the nervous system; (ii) actively manage growing cysticerci either with antiparasitic drugs or surgical excision; (iii) prioritize the management of intracranial hypertension secondary to neurocysticercosis before considering any other form of therapy; and (iv) manage seizures as done for seizures due to other causes of secondary seizures (remote symptomatic seizures) because they are due to an organic focus that has been present for a long time

Neurocysticercosis is responsible for increased rates of seizures and epilepsy in endemic regions. The most common form of the disease, chronic calcific neurocysticercosis, is the end result of the host's inflammatory response to the larval cysticercus of Taenia solium. There is increasing evidence indicating that calcific cysticercosis is not clinically inactive but a cause of seizures or focal symptoms in this population. Perilesional edema is at times also present around implicated calcified foci. A better understanding of the natural history, frequency, epidemiology, and pathophysiology of calcific cysticercosis and associated disease manifestations is needed to define its importance, treatment, and prevention.Neurocysticercosis is a major cause of seizures and other neurologic problems in many less developed countries 1 and a significant health concern in developed countries as well, mostly due to migration of infected persons. 2 Over the last two decades the development of MRI and CT imaging, effective and safe cysticidal drugs, and specific and relatively sensitive serologic tests have given rise to a renaissance in our understanding of the disease and efficacy of treatments. Much of our increased understanding has focused on disease associated with viable or degenerating cysts, broadly referred to as "active" cysticercosis, Copyright © 2004 Life cycleHumans harbor the tapeworm that is acquired by eating poorly cooked pork containing cysticerci of Taenia solium. Ova or proglottids containing ova are excreted in the feces and when ingested by free roaming pigs develop into cysts primarily in the muscles and brain. The usual life cycle is fulfilled after humans ingest undercooked pork. Ova, accidentally ingested by humans, also develop into cysts, mostly in the brain, muscle, and subcutaneous tissues, and this condition is referred to as cysticercosis. 5 Course of infectionAlthough incompletely documented, a reasonable view of the natural history can be ascertained from pathologic, radiologic, and parasitologic studies. Cysticercosis and epilepsyWhile many patients present with single or groups of seizures at various stages of this disease, not all patients develop recurrent seizures, or epilepsy. There are three possibly different scenarios concerning the relationship between cysticercosis and epilepsy: 1) causal relationship, namely, cysticercosis as the cause of focal epilepsies; 2) non causal relationship or simple overlap of two independent and unrelated diseases; and 3) dual pathology. At present there is overwhelming evidence supporting neurocysticercosis as a cause of seizures and epilepsy. Because neurocysticercosis, particularly calcific cysticercosis, is so common in endemic regions (see below), it is likely that two pathologies known to incite seizure activity will be present in some individuals 12 and whether there are interactions or dual pathology between two conditions is speculative. 12 Multiple causes of seizures in cysticercosisThere are multiple ways that cysticercosis can ca...

After the first description of TSP/HAM in 1985 and the elaboration of WHO's diagnostic criteria in 1988, the experience of the professionals in this field has increased so that a critical reappraisal of these diagnostic guidelines was considered timely. Brazilian neurologists and observers from other countries met recently to discuss and propose a modified model for diagnosing TSP/HAM with levels of ascertainment as definite, probable, and possible, according to myelopathic symptoms, serological findings, and/or detection of HTLV-I DNA and exclusion of other disorders.