Recent studies related to global terrorism have suggested the potential of posttraumatic growth (PTG) following experiences of terror exposure. However, investigations of whether psychological distress is reduced or increased by PTG in other trauma contexts have been inconsistent. Results from our studies conducted in New York following the attacks of 11 September 2001 and in Israel during recent tumultuous periods of violence and terrorism, the Al Aqsa Intifada, have found posttraumatic growth to be related to greater psychological distress, more right-wing political attitudes, and support for retaliatory violence. Only when individuals were deeply involved in translating growth cognitions to growth actions in our research on the forced disengagement of settlers from Gaza did we find positive benefit in posttraumatic growth. Findings are considered within the framework of a new formulation of actionfocused growth.De récentes recherches en rapport avec le terrorisme international ont souligné le potentiel du développement post-traumatique (PTG) découlant de la confrontation à la terreur. Toutefois, les travaux cherchant à savoir si la détresse psychologique était atténuée ou accentuée par le PTG dans d'autres contextes traumatiques se sont révélés contradictoires. Nos investigations à New York après l'attentat du 11 septembre 2001 et en Israël durant des périodes récentes de violence et de terrorisme, la seconde Intifada, ont montré que le développement post-traumatique était plutôt lié à une grande détresse psychologique, à des opinions politiques de droite et à une attente de représailles. On a observé lors du déménagement obligatoire des colons de Gaza que ce n'est que lorsque les individus étaient profondément impliqués dans la transformation des cognitions de développement en actions de développement que le développement post-traumatique avait des retombées positives. Ces résultats sont appréhendés dans le cadre d'une nouvelle approche du développement centré sur l'action.

Two models of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have received the most empirical support in confirmatory factor analytic studies: King, Leskin, King, and Weathers' (1998) Emotional Numbing model of reexperiencing, avoidance, emotional numbing and hyperarousal; and Simms, Watson, and Doebbeling's (2002) Dysphoria model of reexperiencing, avoidance, dysphoria and hyperarousal. These models only differ in placement of three PTSD symptoms: sleep problems (D1), irritability (D2), and concentration problems (D3). In the present study, we recruited 252 women victims of domestic violence and tested whether there is empirical support to separate these three PTSD symptoms into a fifth factor, while retaining the Emotional Numbing and Dysphoria models' remaining four factors. Confirmatory factor analytic findings demonstrated that separating the three symptoms into a separate factor significantly enhanced model fit for the Emotional Numbing and Dysphoria models. These three symptoms may represent a unique latent construct. Implications are discussed.

Purpose/Objectives To develop and test the efficacy of a web-based intervention for alleviating depression in male stroke survivors (SSs) and their spousal caregivers (CGs) that blends both peer and professional support. Design and Methods The research consisted of an intervention protocol evaluated by a focus group of rehabilitation professionals, a “think aloud” session conducted with female stroke CGs, and a usability test of the intervention’s online features with 7 female stroke CGs. Efficacy of the final protocol was tested in a two-group randomized clinical trial with a sample of 32 CG-SS dyads. The CGs in the intervention condition received an online group intervention. Intervention components were based on the Stress Process Model. Those CGs in a control condition received minimal support with individualized access to relevant online information. Measures of depression, as well as the secondary outcomes of mastery, self-esteem, and social support, were obtained from SSs and CGs at pretest, post-test, and one-month later. Results At posttest and one month later, CGs in the intervention condition reported significantly lower depression than CGs in the control condition with baseline depression controlled. There was no significant effect on depression among SSs. Although no significant treatment effects for either SSs or CGs were found on the secondary outcomes, post-treatment changes on some constructs were significantly correlated with change in depression. Conclusions/Implications CGs benefit from web-based programs that help them better understand both their emotional needs and those of the SS.