Background
Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) therapy is an alternative to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy.
Methods
We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the SCIG Vivaglobin
®
(formerly known as Beriglobin
®
SC) under real-life conditions in a post-marketing observational study in 82 patients with primary or secondary antibody deficiencies. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was evaluated in a subset of 30 patients previously treated with IVIG (including 11 children < 14 years) using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) for patients ≥ 14 years of age (adults) and the Child Health Questionnaire - Parental Form 50 (CHQ-PF50) for children < 14 years of age. Treatment preferences were assessed in adults.
Results
The mean serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) trough level during SCIG treatment (7.5 g/L) was higher than during previous IVIG treatment (6.6 g/L; p < 0.01). The investigators assessed the efficacy of SCIG therapy as "excellent" in 89% of patients. No systemic adverse drug reactions were observed. Improvements by ≥ 5 points were observed in 5 of 8 SF36 subscales and in 6 of 12 CHQ-PF50 subscales. Statistically significant improvements (p ≤ 0.05) were observed for the SF-36 subscales of bodily pain, general health perceptions, and vitality (adults), and for the CHQ-PF50 subscales of general health perceptions, parental impact - time, parental impact - emotional, and family activities (children). Patients preferred SCIG over IVIG therapy (92%) and home therapy over therapy at the clinic/physician (83%).
Conclusion
This study confirms that therapy with Vivaglobin
®
at home is effective, safe, well tolerated, and improves quality of life in patients with antibody deficiency.
In patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and concomitant Coombs positive autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA) anticardiolipin antibodies (aCL) are found more frequently and at higher titres than in SLE patients without AIHA. In order to assess if aCL elevation is primarily associated with the underlying SLE, or with AIHA itself, we examined AIHA patients with and without underlying SLE for the presence of aCL. aCL (IgG and IgM) were determined by ELISA in 74 SLE patients without AIHA, 22 SLE patients with AIHA, 50 patients with idiopathic AIHA (warm-reactive autoantibodies), 52 patients with idiopathic AIHA (cold-reactive autoantibodies) and 50 healthy controls. The mean IgG and IgM aCL titres in SLE patients without AIHA (IgG 37.0 U/ml, IgM 8.9 U/ml) were significantly elevated compared with the values in healthy controls (IgG 9.1 U/ml, IgM 3.2 U/ml; P < 0.005). The mean aCL levels in SLE patients with AIHA (IgG 53.2 U/ml, IgM 28.2 U/ml) were higher than in SLE patients without AIHA (P = 0.09 for IgG, P < 0.005 for IgM). Interestingly, the mean aCL levels of patients with idiopathic AIHA (warm-reactive autoantibody type: IgG 29.2 U/ml, IgM 19.3 U/ml; cold-reactive autoantibody type: IgG 27.4 U/ml, IgM 18.9 U/ml) were also significantly elevated compared with healthy controls P < 0.001). As aCL are elevated not only in SLE (with and without concomitant AIHA) but also in idiopathic AIHA it can be speculated that aCL are involved in the pathomechanism of autoantibody-induced erythrocyte destruction per se irrespective of an underlying SLE.
These results implicate the participation of NK cells and gammadelta T cells, especially CD8(+)/gammadelta T cells, in the pathogenesis of BD and may explain one mechanism by which IFN-alpha2a exerts therapeutic effects. Alternatively, they may result indirectly from remission induction by IFN-alpha2a. The reduced expression of HLA class I on monocytes in HLA-B*51-positive patients might reflect an impaired expression of and antigen presentation by HLA-B*51.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.