BackgroundCommunity-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infections are spreading, but the source of infections in non-epidemic settings remains poorly defined.MethodsWe carried out a community-based, case-control study investigating socio-demographic risk factors and infectious reservoirs associated with MRSA infections. Case patients presented with CA-MRSA infections to a New York hospital. Age-matched controls without infections were randomly selected from the hospital's Dental Clinic patient population. During a home visit, case and control subjects completed a questionnaire, nasal swabs were collected from index respondents and household members and standardized environmental surfaces were swabbed. Genotyping was performed on S. aureus isolates.ResultsWe enrolled 95 case and 95 control subjects. Cases more frequently reported diabetes mellitus and a higher number of skin infections among household members. Among case households, 53 (56%) were environmentally contaminated with S. aureus, compared to 36 (38%) control households (p = .02). MRSA was detected on fomites in 30 (32%) case households and 5 (5%; p<.001) control households. More case patients, 20 (21%) were nasally colonized with MRSA than were control indexes, 2 (2%; p<.001). In a subgroup analysis, the clinical isolate (predominantly USA300), was more commonly detected on environmental surfaces in case households with recurrent MRSA infections (16/36, 44%) than those without (14/58, 24%, p = .04).ConclusionsThe higher frequency of environmental contamination of case households with S. aureus in general and MRSA in particular implicates this as a potential reservoir for recolonization and increased risk of infection. Environmental colonization may contribute to the community spread of epidemic strains such as USA300.

Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus is often a prelude to infection with the same strain. The prevailing assumption has been that colonized individuals carry a single strain. The present study investigated the frequency of simultaneous nasal carriage of multiple strains of S. aureus. Three bacterial colonies from plated samples from colonized subjects were initially compared by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Fourteen of 148 S. aureus-positive samples demonstrated at least a difference of a single band; 7 of these 14 samples contained different strains, and 3 of these 7 also belonged to different accessory gene regulator (agr) types. The remaining 7 samples contained clonally related isolates; 3 of these 7 contained pairs that differed by the presence or absence of the staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec type IV. A mathematical model that we developed predicted that approximately 6.6% of S. aureus-colonized individuals carry >1 strain. The present study demonstrates that carriage of discordant S. aureus strains in individuals with nasal colonization occurs regularly and suggests that the nares are likely sites for horizontal genetic exchange among strains.

BackgroundThe household is a recognized community reservoir for Staphylococcus aureus. This study investigated potential risk factors for intra-household S. aureus transmission, including the contribution of environmental contamination.MethodsWe investigated intra-household S. aureus transmission using a sample of multiple member households from a community-based case-control study examining risk factors for CA-MRSA infection conducted in Northern Manhattan. During a home visit, index subjects completed a questionnaire. All consenting household members were swabbed, as were standardized environmental household items. Swabs were cultured for S. aureus. Positive isolates underwent further molecular characterization. Intra-household transmission was defined as having identical strains among two or more household members. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for transmission.ResultsWe enrolled 291 households: 146 index cases, 145 index controls and 687 of their household contacts. The majority of indexes were Hispanic (85%), low income (74%), and female (67%), with a mean age of 31 (range 1–79). The average size of case and control households was 4 people. S. aureus colonized individuals in 62% of households and contaminated the environment in 54% of households. USA300 was the predominant clinical infection, colonizing and environmental strain. Eighty-one households had evidence of intra-household transmission: 55 (38%) case and 26 (18%) control households (P<.01). Environmental contamination with a colonizing or clinical infection strain (aOR: 5.4 [2.9–10.3] P<.01) and the presence of a child under 5 (aOR: 2.3 [1.2–4.5] P = .02) were independently associated with transmission. In separate multivariable models, environmental contamination was associated with transmission among case (aOR 3.3, p<.01) and control households (aOR 27.2, p<.01).ConclusionsEnvironmental contamination with a colonizing or clinical infection strain was significantly and independently associated with transmission in a large community-based sample. Environmental contamination should be considered when treating S. aureus infections, particularly among households with multiple infected members.

BackgroundAntibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections have increased dramatically in the community, yet S. aureus nasal colonization has remained stable. The objectives of this study were to determine if S. aureus colonization is a useful proxy measure to study disease transmission and infection in community settings, and to identify potential community reservoirs.Methodology/Principal FindingsRandomly selected households in Northern Manhattan, completed a structured social network questionnaire and provided nasal swabs that were typed by pulsed field gel electrophoresis to identify S. aureus colonizing strains. The main outcome measures were: 1) colonization with S. aureus; and 2) recent serious skin infection. Risk factor analyses were conducted at both the individual and the household levels; logistic regression models identified independent risks for household colonization and infection.Results321 surveyed households contained 914 members. The S. aureus prevalence was 25% and MRSA was 0.4%. More than 40% of households were colonized. Recent antibiotic use was the only significant correlate for household colonization (p = .002). Seventy-eight (24%) households reported serious skin infection. In contrast with colonization, five of the six risk factors that increased the risk of skin infection in the household at the univariate level remained independently significant in multivariable analysis: international travel, sports participation, surgery, antibiotic use and towel sharing. S. aureus colonization was not significantly associated with serious skin infection in any analysis. Among multiperson households with more than one person colonized, 50% carried the same strain.Conclusions/SignificanceThe lack of association between S. aureus nasal colonization and serious skin infection underscores the need to explore alternative venues or body sites that may be crucial to transmission. Moreover, the magnitude of colonization and infection within the household suggests that households are an underappreciated and substantial community reservoir.

It is unclear whether the levels of Staphylococcus aureus colonization of hospital personnel with patient exposure are increased or whether personnel become colonized with more antibiotic-resistant strains. Differences in nasal and hand carriage of S. aureus between medical and nonmedical hospital personnel were examined. No differences in nasal carriage between the two groups were found; however, there was a trend that suggested differences in the rates of hand carriage of S. aureus (18% of nonmedical personnel and 10% of medical personnel). Medical personnel were colonized with more antibiotic-resistant isolates than nonmedical personnel (mean, 2.8 versus 2.1 isolates [P < 0.03]), and the strain profiles indicated that they tended to be more clonal in origin, suggesting that exposure to hospital isolates alters the colonization profile.Staphylococcus aureus remains among the most important nosocomial pathogens because of both the diversity and the severity of the infections caused by these organisms (3, 11). Several studies have documented that these infections are most commonly caused by the patient's own commensal flora (9,18,20). The original reservoir(s) from which patients acquire these isolates remains unclear. While some infected patients are colonized with S. aureus at the time of hospitalization, others likely become colonized, often with more highly antibiotic-resistant isolates, during their hospital stays (3, 5, 7). Hospital personnel are among those implicated as possible sources of these potentially more antibiotic-resistant pathogens. Transmission of these strains to patients is then likely to occur during routine patient care. Despite the possible importance of this sequence of events, the questions of whether health care workers are more likely to be colonized with S. aureus and if these strains reflect those found in the hospital setting have received limited attention.In the present investigation, S. aureus colonization rates among hospital personnel were compared to address three questions. (i) Are medical personnel (MP) with regular exposure to patients more likely to be colonized than nonmedical personnel (NMP)? (ii) Are MP at greater risk than NMP of becoming colonized with more antibiotic-resistant isolates? (iii) Do the staphylococcal isolates collected from MP tend to be more clonal than those collected from NMP?Two hundred eighty employees of Montefiore Medical Center were screened for hand and nasal colonization with S. aureus between July 1999 and July 2000. Specimens for culture were collected at two sites: general medicine wards and an administrative site separate from the hospital. Only employees with direct patient contact were included in the MP group. Employees also completed a questionnaire concerning occupation, medical history, hand-washing behavior, and demographic information. The study was reviewed and approved by the Montefiore Medical Center Institutional Review Board.Specimens for culture were collected from the anterior nares with cotton swabs (Becton Dickinson Cult...