Summary Background The anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab and the tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib have complementary mechanisms of action and synergistic antitumour activity in models of HER2-overexpressing breast cancer. We argue that the two anti-HER2 agents given together would be better than single-agent therapy. Methods In this parallel groups, randomised, open-label, phase 3 study undertaken between Jan 5, 2008, and May 27, 2010, women from 23 countries with HER2-positive primary breast cancer with tumours greater than 2 cm in diameter were randomly assigned to oral lapatinib (1500 mg), intravenous trastuzumab (loading dose 4 mg/kg, subsequent doses 2 mg/kg), or lapatinib (1000 mg) plus trastuzumab. Treatment allocation was by stratified, permuted blocks randomisation, with four stratification factors. Anti-HER2 therapy alone was given for the first 6 weeks; weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) was then added to the regimen for a further 12 weeks, before definitive surgery was undertaken. After surgery, patients received adjuvant chemotherapy followed by the same targeted therapy as in the neoadjuvant phase to 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was the rate of pathological complete response (pCR), analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00553358. Findings 154 patients received lapatinib, 149 trastuzumab, and 152 the combination. pCR rate was significantly higher in the group given lapatinib and trastuzumab (78 of 152 patients [51·3%; 95% CI 43·1–59·5]) than in the group given trastuzumab alone (44 of 149 patients [29·5%; 22·4–37·5]; difference 21·1%, 9·1–34·2, p=0·0001). We recorded no significant difference in pCR between the lapatinib (38 of 154 patients [24·7%, 18·1–32·3]) and the trastuzumab (difference −4·8%, −17·6 to 8·2, p=0·34) groups. No major cardiac dysfunctions occurred. Frequency of grade 3 diarrhoea was higher with lapatinib (36 patients [23·4%]) and lapatinib plus trastuzumab (32 [21·1%]) than with trastuzumab (three [2·0%]). Similarly, grade 3 liver-enzyme alterations were more frequent with lapatinib (27 [17·5%]) and lapatinib plus trastuzumab (15 [9·9%]) than with trastuzumab (11 [7·4%]). Interpretation Dual inhibition of HER2 might be a valid approach to treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer in the neoadjuvant setting. Funding GlaxoSmithKline.

Background Lapatinib (L) plus trastuzumab (T) improves outcomes for metastatic human epidermal growth factor 2–positive breast cancer and increases the pathologic complete response in the neoadjuvant setting, but their role as adjuvant therapy remains uncertain. Methods In the Adjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimization trial, patients with centrally confirmed human epidermal growth factor 2–positive early breast cancer were randomly assigned to 1 year of adjuvant therapy with T, L, their sequence (T→L), or their combination (L+T). The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS), with 850 events required for 80% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.8 for L+T versus T. Results Between June 2007 and July 2011, 8,381 patients were enrolled. In 2011, due to futility to demonstrate noninferiority of L versus T, the L arm was closed, and patients free of disease were offered adjuvant T. A protocol modification required P ≤ .025 for the two remaining pairwise comparisons. At a protocol-specified analysis with a median follow-up of 4.5 years, a 16% reduction in the DFS hazard rate was observed with L+T compared with T (555 DFS events; HR, 0.84; 97.5% CI, 0.70 to 1.02; P = .048), and a 4% reduction was observed with T→L compared with T (HR, 0.96; 97.5% CI, 0.80 to 1.15; P = .61). L-treated patients experienced more diarrhea, cutaneous rash, and hepatic toxicity compared with T-treated patients. The incidence of cardiac toxicity was low in all treatment arms. Conclusion Adjuvant treatment that includes L did not significantly improve DFS compared with T alone and added toxicity. One year of adjuvant T remains standard of care.

After completing this course, the reader will be able to:1. List the molecular targeted agents that are considered standard practice in solid tumors.2. Differentiate among the side effects of commonly used molecular targeted agents.3. Better characterize the side effects of molecular targeted agents.Access and take the CME test online and receive 1 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit ™ at CME.TheOncologist.com CME CME ABSTRACTMajor advances have been achieved in the field of biologically based therapies for cancer in the last few years, and some of the recently approved molecular-targeted therapies are now being used in daily clinical practice. These molecular targets are also expressed in normal cells, which explains the different grades of toxicity, resulting from the disruption of normal cellular function. In general, targeted molecular therapies have good toxicity profiles, but some patients are exquisitely sensitive to these drugs and can develop particular and severe toxicities. In this article, we review the toxicity and safety of various small molecules and monoclonal antibodies used in solid tumors, with discussion of the pathophysiology, correlation with response, and strategies for prevention and management. The Oncologist

Background: The addition of trastuzumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy has significantly improved pathological complete response (pCR) in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer (BC). Lapatinib, a dual HER2/EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, combined with chemotherapy has significantly improved progression free survival in patients with metastatic HER2-positive BC. Additionally, lapatinib combined with trastuzumab improved disease-free and overall survival in patients with metastatic HER2-positive BC. The NeoALTTO trial is testing the efficacy of lapatinib, trastuzumab or their combination together with paclitaxel when given as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with HER2-positive BC. Material and Methods: NeoALTTO is an international, multicenter, randomized study comparing the efficacy of lapatinib plus paclitaxel, versus trastuzumab plus paclitaxel, versus concomitant lapatinib and trastuzumab plus paclitaxel given as neoadjuvant treatment in HER2- positive primary BC. From January, 2008, to December, 2009, 455 patients were randomized from 99 participating sites. Patients were randomized to receive either lapatinib 1500 mg/d (154 pts), or trastuzumab 4 mg/kg IV loading dose followed by 2 mg/kg IV weekly (149 pts), or lapatinib 1000 mg/d with trastuzumab for a total of 6 weeks (152 pts). After this biological window, patients continued on the same targeted therapy plus weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 for a further 12 weeks, until definitive surgery (total neoadjuvant therapy duration of 18 weeks). After surgery, patients received 3 cycles of adjuvant FEC followed by the same targeted therapy as in the biological window of the neoadjuvant phase for a further 34 weeks (to complete 52 weeks of anti-HER2 therapy). The primary objective of the study is to evaluate and compare among the three arms the rate of pCR, defined as the absence of invasive cancer in the breast at the time of surgery. Secondary objectives include objective response rate, safety, pathologic node-negative status, rate of conversion to breast conservation, disease-free survival and overall survival. All patients underwent tumor biopsies for comparative pharmacodynamic analyses before beginning therapy and on day 15 of the biological therapy window. A subset of patients also participated in PET/CT and circulating tumor cells substudies. Results: The last breast surgery was performed in May 2010. Data cleaning and analysis will be complete by November 2010 and results for safety and the primary objective (pCR) of this important phase III trial will be presented at the meeting. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr S3-3.