No abstract

Purpose: A meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography using the contrast agent SonoVue to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions. Method: A comprehensive search of the literature was performed using the Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases to retrieve studies published before February 2020. Data were extracted, and pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios were calculated with meta-analysis software. Heterogeneity was evaluated via the Q test and I2 statistic. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were applied to evaluate potential sources of heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed using the Deeks’ funnel plot asymmetry test. A summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) was constructed. Results: A total of 27 studies including 5378 breast lesions subjected to CEUS examination with SonoVue were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity values were 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88–0.91; inconsistency index [ I2] = 75.7%) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.82–0.85; I2 = 91.0%), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 48.35% (95% CI, 31.22–74.89; I2 = 77.6%). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.9354. Meta-regression analysis revealed the region of patient residence and dose of contrast agent as potential sources of heterogeneity (P < .01). Subgroup analysis showed a higher area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve for European and higher contrast agent dose subgroups (P < .05). Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with SonoVue displays high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy when differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions. Despite its current limitations, this technique presents a promising tool for diagnosing breast lesions in clinical practice.

Objectives-The aim of this study was to explore a modified model to simplify the diagnostic process for American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3 to 5 breast lesions and evaluate the model's diagnostic efficacy. Methods-A retrospective review was conducted of breast lesions examined by B-mode ultrasound (US) and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and diagnosed by histopathologic examination from October 2016 to August 2019. The US characteristics of a combined model (US + CEUS model) with relatively high diagnostic value were selected by a lasso regression analysis to establish a modified model. Two nomograms were developed. The results were internally validated by bootstrap resampling. Results-Overall, 206 breast lesions in 198 patients, 136 benign and 70 malignant, were included. Ultrasound characteristics included in the modified model were shape, margin, microcalcification, enhanced intensity, enhanced scope, and enhanced time. For the US + CEUS model and modified model, sensitivities were 94.3% and 93.3%; specificities were 85.9% and 81.4%; accuracies were 89.3% and 88.7% and areas under the curve were 0.957 and 0.944, respectively. No statistically significant differences were seen in the diagnostic efficacies of the models (P = .097). Bootstrap-corrected sensitivities, specificities. and accuracies of the models were consistent with these results. Bootstrap-corrected areas under the curve for the US + CEUS model and the modified model were 0.955 and 0.940, respectively. Conclusions-The modified model with fewer indicators conveniently and effectively diagnosed the malignancy of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3 to 5 breast lesions without reducing diagnostic efficacy.