Cyclosporin (CyA) has been shown to be highly effective and well tolerated in the short-term treatment of severe childhood atopic dermatitis; however, there is limited experience in its longer-term use. The aim of this study was to compare multiple short courses of CyA with continuous therapy for 1 year, with respect to efficacy, safety, tolerability and quality of life. Children aged 2-16 years, with a diagnosis of severe atopic dermatitis refractory to topical steroid therapy, were randomly assigned to receive short course therapy (multiple courses of 12 weeks) or continuous therapy. The starting dose and maximum dose for all patients was 5 mg/kg per day. Disease activity was monitored using the Six Area Six Sign Atopic Dermatitis score and the 'Rule of Nines' area score. Pruritus, sleep disturbance and irritability were measured using visual analogue scales, and topical therapy was monitored. Safety measurements included monitoring of serum creatinine, blood pressure and adverse events. Forty patients were included in the efficacy analysis, 21 of whom were randomized to the short course group (of whom six were withdrawn) and 19 to the continuous group (of whom five were withdrawn). Significant improvements were seen in all efficacy parameters at every time-point. There were no significant differences between groups, although the improvement was more consistent in the continuous arm. In the short course arm, 7 out of 21 patients could be managed by at least two short courses. The remaining 14 patients includes 12 who could not be controlled by at least two short courses, one patient who failed to return after week 12 and another patient who was withdrawn at week 4 due to an adverse event. Quality of life improved for both the children and their families. Tolerability was considered good or very good in at least 80% of the patients at week 12 and at the end of the study. No clinically significant change was seen in mean serum creatinine and no change was seen in mean blood pressure in either group. CyA is effective in controlling severe atopic dermatitis in children over a 1-year period and is well tolerated. More consistent control is achieved with continuous treatment; however, short course therapy was adequate for some patients, indicating that treatment should be tailored to the individual patient's needs. Short course treatment may produce prolonged remission in some cases and reduce the cumulative exposure to the drug.
A working party of 13 dermatologists, two family practitioners and a paediatrician was assembled, with the aim of developing a minimum list of reliable discriminators for atopic dermatitis. Each physician was asked to select 10 consecutive new cases of unequivocal mild to moderate atopic dermatitis and 10 controls with other inflammatory dermatoses. Each subject was examined by two independent observers, who were blind to the clinical diagnosis and study aim, with regard to 31 clinically useful diagnostic features for atopic dermatitis. Two hundred and twenty-four patients were studied (120 cases and 102 controls). Using the key physician's clinical diagnosis as a gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of each of the 31 diagnostic criteria were tested. Using multiple logistic regression techniques, a minimum set of diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis was derived. These were: history of flexural involvement, history of a dry skin, onset under the age of 2, personal history of asthma, history of a pruritic skin condition, and visible flexural dermatitis. Adjustment for age, sex, region, social class and ethnic group did not alter the choice of final criteria. The discriminatory value of these criteria was also satisfactory when tested against a further sample of 150 patients drawn from the community, who did not have skin disease.
Azathioprine is an effective and useful drug in severe AD although it is not always well-tolerated. Monitoring of the full blood count and liver enzymes is advisable during treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.