Campbell, B. C.V. et al. (2019) Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical therapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data.ABSTRACT Background: CT-perfusion (CTP) and MRI may assist patient selection for endovascular thrombectomy. We aimed to establish whether imaging assessments of ischaemic core and penumbra volumes were associated with functional outcomes and treatment effect.
Campbell, B. C. V. et al. (2018) Effect of general anaesthesia on functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke having endovascular thrombectomy versus standard care: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Neurology, 17(1), pp. 47-53. (doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30407-6) This is the author's final accepted version.There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher's version if you wish to cite from it.http://eprints.gla.ac.uk/149670/ variables. An alternative approach using propensity-score stratification was also used. To account for between-trial variance we used mixed-effects modeling with a random effect for trial incorporated in all models. Bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool.Findings: Of 1764 patients in 7 trials, 871 were allocated to endovascular thrombectomy. After exclusion of 74 patients (72 who did not undergo the procedure and 2 with missing data on anaesthetic strategy), 236/797 (30%) of endovascular patients were treated under GA. At baseline, GA patients were younger and had shorter time to randomisation but similar pre-treatment clinical severity compared to non-GA. Endovascular thrombectomy improved functional outcome at 3 months versus standard care in both GA (adjusted common odds ratio (cOR) 1·52, 95%CI 1·09-2·11, p=0·014) and non-GA (adjusted cOR 2·33, 95%CI 1·75-3·10, p<0·001) patients. However, outcomes were significantly better for those treated under non-GA versus GA (covariate-adjusted cOR 1·53, 95%CI 1·14-2·04, p=0·004; propensitystratified cOR 1·44 95%CI 1·08-1·92, p=0·012). The risk of bias and variability among studies was assessed to be low.Interpretation: Worse outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy were associated with GA, after adjustment for baseline prognostic variables. These data support avoidance of GA whenever possible. The procedure did, however, remain effective versus standard care in patients treated under GA, indicating that treatment should not be withheld in those who require anaesthesia for medical reasons. Funding:The HERMES collaboration was funded by an unrestricted grant from Medtronic to the University of Calgary. Research in contextEvidence before this study between abolition of the thrombectomy treatment effect in MR CLEAN and no effect in THRACE. Three single-centre randomised trials of general anaesthesia versus conscious sedation found either no difference in functional outcome between groups or a slight benefit of general anaesthesia. Added value of this studyThese data from contemporary, high quality randomised trials form the largest study to date of the association between general anesthesia and the benefit of endovascular thrombectomy versus standard care. We used two different approaches to adjust for baseline imbalances (multivariable logistic regression and propensity-score stratification). We found that GA for endovascular thrombectomy, as practiced in contemporary clinical care across a wide range of expert centres during the rand...
Background and Purpose-Our objective was to evaluate the relationship between cannabis use and ischemic stroke in a young adult population. Methods-Forty-eight consecutive young patients admitted for acute ischemic stroke participated in the study. First-line screening was performed, including blood tests, cardiovascular investigations, and urine analysis for cannabinoids. If no etiology was found, 3D rotational angiography and cerebrospinal fluid analysis were performed. A control was planned through neurovascular imaging within 3 to 6 months. Results-In this series, there was multifocal intracranial stenosis associated with cannabis use in 21% (nϭ10). Conclusions-Multifocal MethodsFrom October 2005 to September 2007, 48 consecutive patients younger than 45 years of age who were admitted to our stroke unit for IS were included in this study. Patients were informed that they were included in a prospective study and agreed to participate. Standard T1, T2, FLAIR sequences, diffusion weighted-imaging magnetic resonance imaging scans were acquired for all patients. Vascular imaging comprised 3D-time of flight magnetic resonance angiography (nϭ43) or cerebral computed tomography angiography (nϭ5). Cardiac explorations included electrocardiogram (nϭ48), transthoracic echocardiography (nϭ48), and transoesophageal echocardiography (nϭ29). Exhaustive laboratory analyses were performed for all patients. If first-line investigations were inconclusive, 3D rotational angiography (nϭ30) and cerebrospinal fluid analysis (nϭ29) were performed. A questionnaire was used to determine cardiovascular risk factors, history of medication, and illicit drug or alcohol use. Urines were systematically screened for cannabinoids, cocaine, amphetamine, and methylenedioxymethamphetamine. Follow-up clinical visits (nϭ44) and control of vascular imaging (nϭ20) were planned within 3 to 6 months after discharge from hospital.One study neurologist and 1 study radiologist separately reviewed all 3D-time of flight or computed tomography angiography images. A single operator performed all 3D rotational angiography, and 2 study radiologists, who were unaware of magnetic resonance angiography results, reviewed the 3D rotational angiography images. Involvement of single or several vessel segments were respectively classified as monoarterial stenosis or as multifocal intracranial stenosis (MIS). Statistical AnalysisData are summarized using descriptive statistics. Because of sparseness of data, computations of odds ratio and 95% CI, as well as multivariate logistic regression, were obtained using exact methods (StatXact and LogXact). The logistic regression was designed using the group of MIS as the dependent variable and the other variables as potential predictors. A probability value Յ5% was considered statistically significant. ResultsTable displays the relationship between stroke etiology, classical risk factors, and cannabis use in the 48 patients. There were no patients undergoing serotonergic medical treatment, and there were no amphetamine, meth...
Background and purposeTo date, no study has attempted to quantify the impact of the COVID‐19 outbreak on the incidence and treatment of acute stroke.MethodsThis was a retrospective review of acute stroke pathway parameters in all three stroke units in the Alsace region during the first month of the outbreak (1–31 March 2020), using the similar period from 2019 as a comparator. A secondary detailed analysis of all stroke alerts and stroke unit admissions was performed in the centre with the largest case volume.ResultsCompared to the same period in 2019, in March 2020 there were 39.6% fewer stroke alerts and 33.3% fewer acute revascularization treatments [40.9% less intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and 27.6% less mechanical thrombectomy (MT)]. No marked variation was observed in the number of stroke unit admissions (−0.6%). The proportion of patients with acute revascularization treatments (IVT or MT) out of the total number of stroke unit admissions was significantly lower in March 2020 (21.3%) compared to 2019 (31.8%), P = 0.034. There were no significant differences in time delays or severity of clinical symptoms for patients treated by IVT or MT, nor in the distribution of final diagnosis amongst stroke alerts and stroke unit admissions.ConclusionThese results suggest that the overall incidence of stroke remained the same, but fewer patients presented within the therapeutic time window. Increased public awareness and corrective measures are needed to mitigate the deleterious effects of the COVID‐19 outbreak on acute stroke care.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.