Purpose: To verify the reliability of the new criteria for the diagnosis of IgM gammopathies recently proposed by an international panel of experts (Athens, 2002). Experimental Design: A retrospective series of 698 patients with IgM gammopathy was reviewed paying attention to symptoms, serum IgM concentration, bone marrow infiltration, blood cell count and clinical course. Four clinical entities can be identified: IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (IgM-MGUS), asymptomatic and symptomatic Wandenström's macroglobulinemia (A-WM and S-WM, respectively), and IgM-related disorders, although this last was excluded from the study because of the scarcity of patients due to probable selection biases. The observed mortality was studied related to that expected in the general population of comparable age and sex and over an equivalent period of follow-up (standardized mortality ratio, SMR). Results: IgM-MGUS, A-WM, and S-WM shared many clinical aspects but, with respect to the general population, patients with IgM-MGUS had a slight but definite survival advantage, those with A-WM had a mortality rate equivalent to that of the general population, whereas the SMR of patients with S-WM was 5.4. Within A-WM and S-WM the SMR values did not vary significantly in relation to marrow lymphocyte counts or serum IgM concentrations. Conclusions: Our findings represent a prognostic validation of the applied diagnostic criteria for three of the four identifiable clinical entities and highlight the importance of symptoms over serum IgM concentration and marrow infiltration.

In Italy the existence of a law on health protection of competitive sports since 1982 has favored the creation and the revision of these cardiological guidelines (called COCIS), which have reached their fourth edition (1989-2009). The present article is the second English version, which has summarized the larger version in Italian. The experience of the experts consulted in the course of these past 20 years has facilitated the application and the compatibility of issues related to clinical cardiology to the sports medicine field. Such prolonged experience has allowed the clinical cardiologist to acquire knowledge of the applied physiology of exercise and, on the other hand, has improved the ability of sports physicians in cardiological diagnostics. All this work has produced these guidelines related to the judgment of eligibility for competitive sports in the individual clinical situations and in the different cardiovascular abnormalities and/or heart disease. Numerous arguments are debated, such as interpretation of the athlete's ECG, the utility of a preparticipation screening, arrhythmias, congenital heart disease, cardiomyopathies, arterial hypertension, ischemic heart disease and other particular issues.