Different mechanisms lead to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) resistance. Identifying clinically useful biomarkers might improve drug selection and patients' therapy. We analyzed the soluble immune checkpoints sPD1, sPDL1, sLAG3, and sTIM3 using ELISA and their expression on circulating T cells using FACS in pre-and on-treatment blood samples of ICI treated melanoma patients. In addition, pretreatment melanoma metastases were stained for TIM3 and LAG3 expression by IHC. Results were correlated with treatment response and progression-free survival (PFS). Resistance to anti-PD1 treatment (n = 48) was associated with high pre-treatment serum levels of sLAG3 (DCR: p = .009; PFS: p = .018; ROC cutoff >148 pg/ml) but not sPD1, sPDL1 or sTIM3. In contrast, resistance to ipilimumab plus nivolumab (n = 42) was associated with high levels of sPD1 (DCR: p = .019, PFS: p = .046; ROC cutoff >167 pg/ml) but not sPDL1, sLAG3 or sTIM3. Both treatment regimens shared a profound increase of sPD1 serum levels with treatment (p < .0001). FACS analysis revealed reduced frequencies of CD3+ CD8+ PD1 + T cells (p = .028) in anti-PD1-resistant patients, whereas increased frequencies of CD3+ CD4+ LAG3 + T cells characterized patients resistant to ipilimumab plus nivolumab (p = .033). Unlike anti-PD1 monotherapy, combination blockade significantly increased proliferating T cells (CD3+ CD8+ Ki67 + T cells; p < .0001) and eosinophils (p = .001). In melanoma metastases, an increased infiltration with TIM3+ or LAG3 + T cells in the tumor microenvironment correlated with a shorter PFS under anti-PD1 treatment (TIM3: p = .019, LAG3: p = .07). Different soluble immune checkpoints characterized checkpoint inhibitor-resistant melanoma. Measuring these serum markers may have the potential to be used in clinical routine.

Multiple reports have highlighted the importance of the local immunological cellular composition (i.e. the density of effector T cells and macrophage polarization state) in predicting clinical outcome in advanced metastatic stage of colorectal cancer. However, in spite of the general association between a high effector T cell density and improved outcome, our recent work has revealed a specific lymphocyte-driven cancer cell-supporting signal. Indeed, lymphocyte-derived CCL5 supports CCR5-positive tumor cell proliferation and thereby fosters tumor growth in metastatic liver lesions. Upon systematic analysis of CCR5 expression by tumor cells using immunohistochemistry, we observed that the intensity of CCR5 increases with primary tumor size and peaks in T4 tumors. In liver metastases however, though CCR5 expression intensity is globally heightened compared to primary tumors, alterations in the expression patterns appear, leading to "patchiness" of the stain. CCR5 patchiness is, therefore, a signature of liver metastases in our cohort (n = 97 specimens) and relates to globally decreased expression intensity, but does not influence the extent of the response to CCR5 inhibitor Maraviroc in patients. Moreover, CCR5 patchiness relates to a poor immune landscape characterized by a low cytotoxic-to-regulatory T cell ratio at the invasive margin and enriched cellular and molecular markers of macrophage M2 polarization. Finally, because higher numbers of PD-1-and CTLA-4-positive cells surround tumors with patchy CCR5 expression, one can speculate that these tumors potentially respond to immune checkpoint blockade. This hypothesis is corroborated by the prolonged disease-free survival and disease-specific survival observed in patients with low gene expression of CCR5 in metastases from two publically available cohorts. These observations highlight the complex role of the CCL5-CCR5 axis in CRC metastatic progression and warrant further investigations.