Background The aim of this study was to carry out a descriptive analysis of the somatic genetic profile and co‐occurring mutations of non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) samples from patients tested with comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). Methods This was a retrospective cross‐sectional study of patients diagnosed with NSCLC from 2013 to 2018 in Brazil and whose samples were submitted to CGP (FoundationOne or FoundationACT) using either tumor or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from plasma. Results We recovered 513 CGP results from patients, 457 (89.1%) of which were from tumors and 56 (10.9%) from plasma. The median age of patients was 64 years old, of which 51.6% were males. TP53 mutations were identified in 53.6% of tumor samples, KRAS mutations in 24.2%, EGFR activating mutations were detected in 22.5%, STK11 mutations in 11.6%, PIK3CA mutations in 8.8%, ALK rearrangements in 5.4%, BRAF mutations in 5.2%, and ERBB2 alterations in 4.9%. The most commonly comutated gene was TP53. TP53 p.R337H was observed in 4.3% of samples and was associated with somatic mutations in EGFR and ERBB2 (P < 0.00001). Tumor mutational burden (TMB) analysis was available for 80.5% of samples tested, and 5.5% of samples had high TMB (≥ 20 mutations/Mb). In conclusion, this retrospective analysis of genomic data from NSCLC patients obtained by CGP showed that common abnormalities such as EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements had similar frequency to those previously described by other groups using others strategies. Additionally, our data confirm an association between TP53 p.R337H, supposedly germline in nature, and somatic mutations in genes of the HER family. Key points Significant findings of the study This is the first report of the prevalence of driver mutations in Brazilian NSCLC patients using comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP). The frequency of the most common driver mutations in this population was similar to that previously described in Brazil. What this study adds TP53 was the most commonly comutated gene across samples. TP53 p.R337H was associated with somatic mutations in EGFR and ERBB2. Most samples had low TMB; only 5.5% of samples had high TMB.

5505 Background: ADT combined with AAP, APA, enzalutamide or docetaxel are among the standard treatment options to patients (pts) with hormone sensitive advanced/metastatic prostate cancer (PC). However, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) due to ADT impact negatively on the quality of life of these patients. Effective options with fewer TRAEs are required. Methods: LACOG 0415 is a phase II, randomized trial (1:1:1) evaluating the use of AA 1000mg po + prednisone 5mg po BID + ADT versus APA 240mg po alone versus AA 1000mg po + prednisone 5mg po BID + APA 240mg po in patients with advanced PC with non-castrate testosterone levels and indication of ADT (N+ or M+ or biochemical relapse combined with PSA ≥ 20 ng/ml or with PSA≥4 ng/ml and PSA doubling-time < 10 months). Stratification factors: metastatic disease (+/-). Primary endpoint was the percentage of pts who achieved PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/mL at Week 25, we estimated a PSA response rate of 65% in each of the three arms with a null hypothesis of 45%, power of 80% and alfa 5%, using Fleming one-stage method. Secondary endpoints were percentage of pts with ≥ 80% and ≥ 50% decline in PSA at week 25, radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and safety. Results: 128 patients were randomized between Oct 2017 and Apr 2019, and 122 pts were evaluable for PSA response. Median age was 69y (range, 53-88); most pts had ECOG PS0-1(99%). 17% of pts had biochemical relapse only, 9% N+ and 74% M+ disease. At week 25 the PSA was ≤ 0.2 ng/mL in 76% of pts in AAP+ADT arm, 59% in APA, and 80% in APA+AAP. All pts had a decline of ≥ 50% in PSA at week 25. 97% had a decline of ≥ 80% in PSA at week 25: 100% of pts in AAP+ADT arm, 95% in APA and 98% in APA+AAP. A total of 3 pts had clinical progressive disease, one in each arm. Two of them also had radiological progression at week 25, 1 pt in AAP+ADT arm and 1 pt in APA. TRAEs rates of any grade were 71% in AAP+ADT arm, 64% in APA, and 65% in APA+AAP. TRAEs rates of Grade≥3 were 12% in AAP+ADT arm, 9% in APA and 16% in APA+AAP. 9 pts (7%) discontinued the treatment before the week 25, 5(4%) of them due to toxicity: 1 pt from AAP+ADT, 2 pts from APA, and 6 pts from APA+AAP. Conclusions: The AAP+ADT and APA+AAP groups showed high effectiveness in terms of PSA response. Radiologic disease control and the decline of ≥ 80% in PSA at week 25 were similar among all treatment arms. APA alone had less toxicity. APA+AAP and APA alone are promising regimens in this setting. No new safety signal was detected in the study. Clinical trial information: NCT02867020 .

INTRODUCTION: The evaluation of an individual with risk of hereditary breast cancer is based on the patient's family history and the characteristics of the neoplasia. BRCA1 and BRCA 2 are the most common genes associated with hereditary predisposition for breast or ovarian cancer. The evaluation of an individual with risk of hereditary breast cancer is key to identify patients with indication to BRCA test. Recent studies in US suggests that 31 to 34% of patients with breast cancer should be referred for genetic evaluation. In Brazil, the proportion of BC patients with indication to genetic evaluation is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence of breast cancer patients enrolled in the AMAZONA III study with indication for genetic evaluation considering the criteria for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC). METHOD: We evaluated the database of the AMAZONA III observational, prospective cohort study which included 2950 patients newly diagnosed with BC in the period of 2016-18 within 23 Brazilian sites. The criteria used to select patients who should be referred for genetic testing were extracted from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline 2018. The characteristics of interest were summarized through descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 1094 (37%) BC patients had at least one criteria for HBOC syndrome test. The most common criteria for testing was age equal or inferior 45 years (27%), BC diagnosis under 50 years and family history of breast cancer (13.5%). From the 2950 enrolled patients, 651 (22%) had the information about whether an evaluation of BRCA test was performed. Of them only 45 (6.9%) performed BRCA test, one patient from public health system and the others from private health system and from those tested 18 (40%) had an identified pathogenic mutation. CONCLUSION: A high proportion of patients diagnosed with BC in Brazil have a criteria for HBOC syndrome testing. Nonetheless a few patients have access to genetic counseling and BRCA test, especially in the public health system. Therefore its critical to implement health policies to facilitate the access to specialized care in hereditary cancer. Frequency of each criteria regarding all 2950 patientsTotal - n (%)Missing - n (%)&lt;=45 years806 (27.32)62 (2.10)&lt;= 60 years and molecular subtype triple negative234 (7.93)681 (23.08)Family history of ovarian cancer101 (3.42)214 (7.25)&lt;= 50 years and family history of breast cancer388 (13.15)214 (7.25)&lt;= 50 years and personal history of breast cancer26 (0.88)142 (4.81)Personal history of ovarian cancer4 (0.14)142 (4.81) Citation Format: Alessandra BorbaAnton de Souza, Daniela Rosa, Antonio LuiZ Frasson, Felipe Pereira Zerwes, Nathalia Cunha Rossato, Patricia Asthon-Prolla, Sergio Simon, Jose Bines, Carlos Barrios, Alessandra Morelle, Carlos AlbertoSampaio Filho, Max Mano, Rafaela Gomes, Gustavo Werutsky. Prevalence of patients with indication of genetic evaluation for hereditary breast and ovarian syndrome in the Brazilian cohort study - AMAZONA III [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-09-11.

PURPOSE Despite the advances in the approach to non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with CNS metastasis, access to timely diagnosis and treatment may not be optimal in many instances. Our main objective was to describe a cohort of patients with NSCLC with brain metastases from public and private cancer centers, and the differences between patients' presentation, treatment, and outcomes. METHODS GBOT-LACOG 0417 is a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with NSCLC and CNS metastasis in Brazil. All patients had confirmed diagnosis of NSCLC between January 2010 and December 2015. CNS metastases were identified by imaging. RESULTS A total of 273 patients were included. Patients treated at public institutions were more often Black or Brown (38.8% v 15.4%), current or former smoker (88.6% v 60.0%), of squamous cell histology (25.0% v 9.1%), EGFR- and ALK-negative (95.9% v 74.9%), and were less frequently assessed by using brain magnetic resonance imaging (38.8% v 83.6%). At public institutions, patients were more often symptomatic (78.1% v 44.6%) and had worse performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 2 or higher 61.5% v 10.3%). CNS metastases were larger (median size 25 v 15 mm) and more often surrounded by edema (67.7% v 55.2%) at public institutions. Patients at public institutions were more frequently treated with whole-brain radiation therapy (72.9% v 45.4%) and less frequently with radiosurgery (6.3% v 24.1%). Among patients from private care, median overall survival was 24.2 months (95% CI, 20.0 to 30.6), significantly higher than in public care (median 12.1 months; 95% CI, 6.7 to 13.6; P < .001). CONCLUSION Our results demonstrate the discrepancy between public and private health care system in the critical setting of patients with CNS metastasis from NSCLC.

No abstract