BACKGROUND-During primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), manual thrombectomy may reduce distal embolization and thus improve microvascular perfusion. Small trials have suggested that thrombectomy improves surrogate and clinical outcomes, but a larger trial has reported conflicting results.
Symptomatic CO following TAVI was a rare but life-threatening complication that occurred more frequently in women, in patients receiving a balloon-expandable valve, and in those with a previous surgical bioprosthesis. Lower-lying coronary ostium and shallow sinus of Valsalva were associated anatomic factors, and despite successful treatment, acute and late mortality remained very high, highlighting the importance of anticipating and preventing the occurrence of this complication.
To assess platelet function profiles in diabetic and nondiabetic patients on aspirin and clopidogrel therapy, two patient populations were included to investigate the 1) acute effects of a 300-mg clopidogrel loading dose (group 1, n ؍ 52) and 2) long-term effects of clopidogrel (group 2, n ؍ 120) on platelet function in diabetic compared with nondiabetic patients already on aspirin treatment. Patients were stratified according to the presence of type 2 diabetes. Platelet aggregation was assessed using light transmittance aggregometry (groups 1 and 2). Platelet activation (P-selectin expression and PAC-1 binding) was determined using wholeblood flow cytometry (group 2). Clopidogrel response was also assessed. In group 1, platelet aggregation was significantly increased in diabetic (n ؍ 16) compared with nondiabetic (n ؍ 36) patients at baseline and up to 24 h following a 300-mg loading dose (P ؍ 0.005). In group 2, platelet aggregation and activation were increased in diabetic (n ؍ 60) compared with nondiabetic (n ؍ 60) subjects (P < 0.05 for all platelet function assays). Diabetic subjects had a higher number of clopidogrel nonresponders (P ؍ 0.04). Diabetic patients have increased platelet reactivity compared with nondiabetic subjects on combined aspirin and clopidogrel treatment. Reduced sensitivity to antiplatelet drugs may contribute to the increased atherothombotic risk in diabetic patients. Diabetes 54:2430 -2435, 2005 D iabetes is commonly associated with accelerated atherosclerosis, clinically resulting in premature coronary artery disease (CAD), increased risk of cerebrovascular disease, and severe peripheral vascular disease (1). Patients with type 2 diabetes have a two-to fourfold increase in the risk of CAD, and diabetic patients without prior myocardial infarction have the same risk for a subsequent acute coronary event as nondiabetic patients with a previous myocardial infarction (2,3). Recurrent ischemic events are also more frequent in patients with type 2 diabetes than in nondiabetic patients (4 -6). Platelet dysfunction, among other mechanisms, contribute to the increased risk of atherothrombotic complications in the diabetic population (7-9). Such altered platelet function is revealed by hypersensitivity to aggregants observed in in vitro studies.Platelets from diabetic subjects are also less sensitive to aspirin (10 -11). Importantly, reduced sensitivity, or "poor response," to aspirin has been associated with an increased risk of ischemic events (12-15). Combining clopidogrel to aspirin enhances platelet inhibition and has been associated with a reduction in ischemic events compared with the use of aspirin alone (16 -19). However, the magnitude of antiplatelet effects may be depressed in diabetic patients. The aim of this study was to compare platelet function profiles in diabetic and nondiabetic patients on combined aspirin and clopidogrel therapy.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSTwo patient populations were included to investigate the 1) acute effects of a 300-mg loading dose of...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.