EMPIRE10 (Evaluation of Methods for Pulmonary Image REgistration 2010) is a public platform for fair and meaningful comparison of registration algorithms which are applied to a database of intrapatient thoracic CT image pairs. Evaluation of nonrigid registration techniques is a nontrivial task. This is compounded by the fact that researchers typically test only on their own data, which varies widely. For this reason, reliable assessment and comparison of different registration algorithms has been virtually impossible in the past. In this work we present the results of the launch phase of EMPIRE10, which comprised the comprehensive evaluation and comparison of 20 individual algorithms from leading academic and industrial research groups. All algorithms are applied to the same set of 30 thoracic CT pairs. Algorithm settings and parameters are chosen by researchers expert in the configuration of their own method and the evaluation is independent, using the same criteria for all participants. All results are published on the EMPIRE10 website (http://empire10.isi.uu.nl). The challenge remains ongoing and open to new participants. Full results from 24 algorithms have been published at the time of writing. This paper details the organization of the challenge, the data and evaluation methods and the outcome of the initial launch with 20 algorithms. The gain in knowledge and future work are discussed.

In this paper, we describe our method for the ISIC 2019 Skin Lesion Classification Challenge. The challenge comes with two tasks. For task 1, skin lesions have to be classified based on dermoscopic images. For task 2, dermoscopic images and additional patient meta data have to be used. A diverse dataset of 25 000 images was provided for training, containing images from eight classes. The final test set contains an additional, unknown class. We address this challenging problem with a simple, data driven approach by including external data with skin lesions types that are not present in the training set. Furthermore, multi-class skin lesion classification comes with the problem of severe class imbalance. We try to overcome this problem by using loss balancing. Also, the dataset contains images with very different resolutions. We take care of this property by considering different model input resolutions and different cropping strategies. To incorporate meta data such as age, anatomical site, and sex, we use an additional dense neural network and fuse its features with the CNN. We aggregate all our models with an ensembling strategy where we search for the optimal subset of models. Our best ensemble achieves a balanced accuracy of 74.2 % using five-fold crossvalidation. On the official test set our method is ranked first for both tasks with a balanced accuracy of 63.6 % for task 1 and 63.4 % for task 2.

To investigate the feasibility of tumor type prediction with MRI radiomic image features of different brain metastases in a multiclass machine learning approach for patients with unknown primary lesion at the time of diagnosis. Materials and methods: This single-center retrospective analysis included radiomic features of 658 brain metastases from T1-weighted contrast material-enhanced, T1-weighted nonenhanced, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images in 189 patients (101 women, 88 men; mean age, 61 years; age range, 32-85 years). Images were acquired over a 9-year period (from September 2007 through December 2016) with different MRI units, reflecting heterogeneous image data. Included metastases originated from breast cancer (n = 143), small cell lung cancer (n = 151), non-small cell lung cancer (n = 225), gastrointestinal cancer (n = 50), and melanoma (n = 89). A total of 1423 quantitative image features and basic clinical data were evaluated by using random forest machine learning algorithms. Validation was performed with model-external fivefold cross validation. Comparative analysis of 10 randomly drawn cross-validation sets verified the stability of the results. The classifier performance was compared with predictions from a respective conventional reading by two radiologists. Results: Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the five-class problem ranged between 0.64 (for non-small cell lung cancer) and 0.82 (for melanoma); all P values were less than .01. Prediction performance of the classifier was superior to the radiologists' readings. Highest differences were observed for melanoma, with a 17-percentage-point gain in sensitivity compared with the sensitivity of both readers; P values were less than .02. Conclusion: Quantitative features of routine brain MR images used in a machine learning classifier provided high discriminatory accuracy in predicting the tumor type of brain metastases.